he oughta try hunting for an Iphone or gathering nuclear technology sometimes.:lamo
Show that they don't, lobbying, in regards to politics is really the main issue.
Yes, they obviously had any of the resources to make those thousands of years ago. Talk about illogical argumentation.
Yes, they obviously had any of the resources to make those thousands of years ago. Talk about illogical argumentation.
I see.. this is illogical argumentation, but presenting such a society as somehow superior to capitalism isn't. :lamo
it's bad form to ask someone to show a negative.
its your claim they have "too much power"... it's a positive claim that demands substantiation.
be warned , though... it's pretty hard to define "too much"
Illogical and emotional response to that said.50 cents a week is what they're worth when they produce **** loads of more value.. any citations?
Another lame reply.No wonder capitalists love to move production to third world countries without labor laws/minimum wage laws.
Lame. More emotive nonsense.I'm sorry, it is my business, millions are starving to death.
I didn't stutter. Yes it is a dime a dozen. That is reality, not disrespect, but way to go all emotive again. :dohManual labor is worth a dime.. the disrespect for most of the world is hilarious, billions will have to do manual labor, they deserve respect and a decent wage.
Yes they are.They are not emotional appeal, ask me what I need to support and I will.
More illogical emotive lameness.Are children receiving healthcare providing any value when they receive it? ... Many on welfare work, so I'd say they give back to capitalists.
Did I stutter? Your arguments are lame.Lame statements?
See! Just more emotive lame nonsense.You're the one purposefully making yourself look like a dick.
More lameness.Really? Ok, let me go down this line, let's assume all countries have access to education, the road to be successful, then we have costs, failure rates, and let alone the fact that manual labor will always exist, and people will always be doing the "worthless" jobs, such as mining, sweatshopping, apple factories, logging, service jobs.. What do you define as success? Do you think everyone just needs to WORK HARDER HARR BECAUSE A MAJORITY CAN OBVIOUSLY ALL BECOME BUSINESSMEN IN SUITS WHO DON'T DO MANUAL LABOR. That makes no sense, I'd rather acknowledge that manual labor requires skill, dedication, and manual laborers work harder then any capitalist.
No it isn't. Never will be.It is my business,
More lameness. You need to support your assertions. Not I.Find me anything on MLK/albert einstein wanting to acquire profit.
:lamoShow that they don't, lobbying, in regards to politics is really the main issue.
Illogical and emotional response to that said.
Again;You judge that by the local prevailing rate, just as you judge the conditions by the local requirements.
If it is only worth 0.50¢ a week, that is all it is worth.
Another lame reply.
Consumers demand inexpensive products.
You can not fault the business owner for that.
And as it is a business, profits should be maximized and if it is a Corporation it is a fiduciary responsibility.
There is nothing wrong with it.
Lame. More emotive nonsense.
Others people money, especially that which has already been taxed, is not your business. Period.
Nothing you can say changes that.
And there are not millions starving in the US, which this topic is about.
But if you really want to help those starving in other countries go there, and for their societies sake reduce their damn population.
I didn't stutter. Yes it is a dime a dozen. That is reality, not disrespect, but way to go all emotive again. :doh
They have a decent wage if it is in accordance with the prevailing wage of their local.
Yes they are.
Again; Go where you think you are needed and reduce their populations.
More illogical emotive lameness.
The healthcare they receive should be provided by their parents.
Not society.
Did I stutter? Your arguments are lame.
See! Just more emotive lame nonsense.
It is really all you have. Truly sad.
More lameness.
Yes really.
Again;This is why your arguments fail.Manual labor is a dime a dozen and as such is worth that.
Scarce and more skilled labor is worth more.
No it isn't. Never will be.
More lameness. You need to support your assertions. Not I.
:lamo
I do not need to show a negative. D'oh! You have to show what you assert.
Thus far no one has shown they have too much power.
No one has yet to show that the wealthy have too much power.
https://www.opensecrets.org/influence/ Make your own judgement.
Even if they would, you would likely not accept it.
it's all meaningless without proper solutions being offered.
I've claimed lobbying is a problem, provided evidence of who lobbies, what they influence.. Say what you want.
You can wake up a person who is actually asleep, you can't wake someone who is pretending to be asleep.
what are you babbling about?
is your opposition to lobbying consistent?
I mean, do you really hate it when labor unions lobby for minimum wage increases?... be honest.
Think about it.
The entire lobbying system needs to go away, but if it exists, yes, I'm ok with that, if it's the only way to actually influence something.
Lobbying at this point mainly helps those with lots of money, I'm all for citizen participation.
Lobbying at this point mainly helps those with lots of money, I'm all for citizen participation.
opposing lobbying and supporting citizen participation are contradictory positions.
the opinion of lobbying mainly helping those with lots of money is extremely suspect....care to offer substantiation to that opinion?
Another lame reply.Ok, 40 hours, at least, of labor a week by laborers in the third world, is worth 50 cents a week? You claim this hilarious bull****, you give me the evidence.
More lameness. Figures.You admit that capitalists purposefully exploit workers?
And you are wrong because it is not your business.You can't say it's not my business, I think it is.
I am advocating you participating in their society to reduce their starvation by population reduction. That is the only thing that really works.Reduce their populations? What are you advocating here, genocide?
:dohSo, if a child with parents who can't afford healthcare (Well, we have found ways to help that now..) is hurt, should they be denied care? After all, who cares?
More irrational lameness and wrong to boot. Figures.You refuse to give a reason for why they're lame, emotional appeal isn't emotional when it is the truth.
No, I am not.You are defining skilled labor on your own, very illogical and ignorant.
:naughtyHey, you're not backing up your assertions, the MLK/einstein point is obvious.
:dohCapitalism doesn't help end poverty, it feeds off of it, as you have admitted.
1. Wrong.Even if they would, you would likely not accept it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?