Oh Lordie... it is Race Discrimination but unless you know the reason for not hiring a person DUE TO SKIN COLOR ALONE... it is not hard to make a conclusion that it is based off of racism. Look, you are new here but I gotta tell you... pick up your debating skills. It is becoming quite obvious that your posts are not up to par.
You are calling me a Troll? WTF? Be specific in your charge and with your evidence... Go.
Racism is the cause and discrimination based on race is the effect. For example, not hiring someone because of their race, may be discrimination, believing that someone of that race is inferior to you is racism. In that case, the cause, racism, leads to the effect, discrimination. These are important distinctions, because you are not claiming that this administration is discriminating against white people, you are claiming that the administration of Joe Biden, who looks pretty white to me, believes that white people are inferior to other races. Which is a rather outlandish claim and certainly not one I, or other rational people, agree with.
When I pointed this out before, you assured me that you understood the difference. If you understood the difference, then you knew I wouldn't agree with you and were just writing something you knew wasn't true to provoke a response. Also I noticed that your ad hominem attacks haven't addressed my position. By the way, where do ad hominem attacks rank on the debate mistakes list? I would say right up there with no true Scotsman and false equivalence...
----
It is not racism to decide that a position of a certain ethnic background is the best person for a job and it is not discrimination so long as the justification for that decision itself isn't unjust. Eliminating a person who is 90 years old from modeling teen clothes is not age discrimination. Excluding a white person for a Hispanic outreach program isn't discrimination based on race. Excluding an Atheist as the pastor of a Baptist church isn't discrimination based on religion. Excluding a male as chaperone a female sports team isn't discrimination on the basis of sex. Finally, choosing a minority cabinet member in order to increase the inclusion of minorities in government isn't discrimination based on race.
Let's ignore the fact that your original post said racism and not discrimination based on race because even that would be incorrect. You are attempting to broaden the definition of discrimination to include just and unjust exclusions and that simply doesn't work. Baptist churches have every right to not hire an Atheist and I don't believe the charge of discrimination based on religion should be leveled against them. Do you? Because if you believe any exclusion based on skin color is discrimination on the basis of race, then it holds to reason that you believe any exclusion based on religion is discrimination on the basis of religion.
ETA: You should definitely pick one small part of this post and craft a response that has nothing to do with the overall post and hope we don't notice another ad hominem.