'Diva' Crockett slammed in scathing report alleging 'toxic staff environment' where staff is berated to tears

[----------]

And she is a Nazi and racist on top of being an alleged bitch. (but Trump!... but Trump!... but Trump!...)

3...2...1... Go!

Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett, one of the most prominent anti-Trump voices in Congress, is the subject of a scathing report this week that labels her as a "diva" and someone who terrorizes staff members.

Several congressional aides who worked for or with Crockett told the New York Post this week that Crockett, 44, described the firebrand congresswoman as "rude" and rarely present in her Washington, D.C., office except when the cameras are rolling.

"She is laying around her apartment, won’t come into the office, and is really just indifferent to staff and will scream at them," one former aide told the outlet, adding that Crockett is "never in the office" and "very disengaged."

The former staffer added that Crockett "freaks out over the most random things."

Another source that is "widely known" the Crockett mistreats staff and is a "diva" that is "focused almost exclusively on being an influencer"

Crockett, who has served in Congress as a representative from Texas since 2023, regularly goes viral for her criticisms of Trump and has called him a "piece of s***" and an "enemy to the United States." The congresswoman is also known for blasting Trump during committee hearings in speeches that often go viral on social media.

The report goes on to say that Crockett usually works from a luxury office building instead of her office and is known for requiring staffers to drive her short distances in a rented car, rather than their personal car, which is typically the method used to save costs.

click here to read

 

[BirdinHand]

Don’t care

 

[iliveonramen]

Old me would have thought she need to be replaced, new me, the fact she is giving conservatives a mini stroke means keep her around.

 

[Logophile]

Don’t care

You obviously cared enough to post a reply so you 've betrayed yourself

 

[Airyaman]

Is this one of those cases where anonymous sources are OK?

I can't tell from one week to the next.

 

[iliveonramen]

Is this one of those cases where anonymous sources are OK?

I can't tell from one week to the next.

Lol, I always forget how that shifts on an hourly basis.

 

[multivita-man]

Considering how she absolutely ripped Miss Trailer Park America a new one in public, I could totally see how she might be difficult to face in a moment of accountability.

 

[bongsaway]

And she is a Nazi and racist on top of being an alleged bitch. (but Trump!... but Trump!... but Trump!...)

3...2...1... Go!

Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett, one of the most prominent anti-Trump voices in Congress, is the subject of a scathing report this week that labels her as a "diva" and someone who terrorizes staff members.

Several congressional aides who worked for or with Crockett told the New York Post this week that Crockett, 44, described the firebrand congresswoman as "rude" and rarely present in her Washington, D.C., office except when the cameras are rolling.

"She is laying around her apartment, won’t come into the office, and is really just indifferent to staff and will scream at them," one former aide told the outlet, adding that Crockett is "never in the office" and "very disengaged."

The former staffer added that Crockett "freaks out over the most random things."

Another source that is "widely known" the Crockett mistreats staff and is a "diva" that is "focused almost exclusively on being an influencer"

Crockett, who has served in Congress as a representative from Texas since 2023, regularly goes viral for her criticisms of Trump and has called him a "piece of s***" and an "enemy to the United States." The congresswoman is also known for blasting Trump during committee hearings in speeches that often go viral on social media.

The report goes on to say that Crockett usually works from a luxury office building instead of her office and is known for requiring staffers to drive her short distances in a rented car, rather than their personal car, which is typically the method used to save costs.

click here to read

This story gets circulated about numerous democratic house members every so often. I guess it was time it popped up again. I would worry more about the lies trump tells his base, meaning you.

 

[----------]

Don’t care

You cared enough to reply.

 

[----------]

Old me would have thought she need to be replaced, new me, the fact she is giving conservatives a mini stroke means keep her around.

She isn't going anywhere. She is the leader of the party now. She's the next brown woman.

 

[Airyaman]

She isn't going anywhere. She is the leader of the party now. She's the next brown woman.

So that's how you see her eh?

 

[iliveonramen]

She isn't going anywhere. She is the leader of the party now. She's the next brown woman.

I'll vote for her to be President. I feel like half the boomer population would get wiped out in some sort of mass aneurysm due to another black president and the fact they seem to really think about her alot.

 

[----------]

I'll vote for her to be President. I feel like half the boomer population would get wiped out in some sort of mass aneurysm due to another black president and the fact they seem to really think about her alot.

I would say she is a Liberal's wet dream.

 

[iliveonramen]

I would say she is a Liberal's wet dream.

You know, maybe not President, in charge of the DOJ. It would be poetic to watch her walk the Trump gang into prison. *chefs kiss*

 

[JMR]

She's the next brown woman.

...wouldn't that translate to "low IQ individual" in Trump speak?

Who exactly issued the "report" that Fox News is reporting about? Is the "report" the NYPost's quotes from unnamed individuals? It's a step up from ZeroHedge, and the likely to be duped individuals find it authentic.

 

[multivita-man]

Don’t care

Yeah, I hear there's a sale at IKEA this weekend. Think I'll check it out.

 

[Logophile]

I'll vote for her to be President. I feel like half the boomer population would get wiped out in some sort of mass aneurysm due to another black president and the fact they seem to really think about her alot.

And there in full view is the criteria for a Democratic presidential candidate. The idea is to wipe out the boomers and let an abusive person with dark skin - only a Democrat would want that "dark skin" to be a hallmark of difference - to prevail no matter how abusive that person is toward subordinates or regulations. Yesssssssss!! Please support her, by all means!!

 

[iliveonramen]

And there in full view is the criteria for a Democratic presidential candidate. The idea is to wipe out the boomers and let an abusive person with dark skin - only a Democrat would want that "dark skin" to be a hallmark of difference - to prevail no matter how abusive that person is toward subordinates or regulations. Yesssssssss!! Please support her, by all means!!

Well you convinced me. I'm a supporter now. You should run her campaign.

 

[BirdinHand]

You obviously cared enough to post a reply so you 've betrayed yourself

You cared enough to reply.

I don’t care what she has done/hasn’t done.

Let me know if there’s some sort of crime in there somewhere. If there is, charge her.

MAGAs coming in here to complain that she’s a “diva” is truly just pathetic.

The crazy old guy they support was just wandering around on the ****ing roof of the White House rambling shit.

How about worry about that.

 

[Logophile]

Well you convinced me. I'm a supporter now. You should run her campaign.

I'll be glad to, on your behalf. But you're gonna have to own up, right?? No backtracking on that racist criteria and ageist agenda of yours. I'll be glad to run your campaign - right into the ground - because we're gonna let the voters decide

 

[JMR]

And there in full view is the criteria for a Democratic presidential candidate. The idea is to wipe out the boomers and let an abusive person with dark skin - only a Democrat would want that "dark skin" to be a hallmark of difference - to prevail no matter how abusive that person is toward subordinates or regulations. Yesssssssss!! Please support her, by all means!!

You rely on an unsubstantiated "report" to come to the "conclusion" that she is an abusive person...We should have a dollar for every democratic woman that the right wing has reported being "abusive" to her staff... do you need a list?

 

[Logophile]

I don’t care what she has done/hasn’t done.

Let me know if there’s some sort of crime in there somewhere. If there is, charge her.

MAGAs coming in here to complain that she’s a “diva” is truly just pathetic.

The crazy old guy they support was just wandering around on the ****ing roof of the White House rambling shit.

How about worry about that.

A Trump deflection isn't going to save you from your interest in the actual issue. I'm sincerely curious as to what made you interested in the first place. Was it an excuse to be snarky or did you feel the need to echo exactly what Republicans have been saying regarding the accusations against the current Republican president?? Or was it something else??

 

[JMR]

I don’t care what she has done/hasn’t done.

Let me know if there’s some sort of crime in there somewhere. If there is, charge her.

MAGAs coming in here to complain that she’s a “diva” is truly just pathetic.

The crazy old guy they support was just wandering around on the ****ing roof of the White House rambling shit.

How about worry about that.

He's reliving his glory days when he bankrupted businesses overseeing construction of his "projects" on site. We're only at the beginning!

 

[Loulit01]

Is this one of those cases where anonymous sources are OK?

I can't tell from one week to the next.

The NY Post has anonymous sources? That's a step up for them.

 

[BirdinHand]

A Trump deflection isn't going to save you from your interest in the actual issue. I'm sincerely curious as to what made you interested in the first place. Was it an excuse to be snarky or did you feel the need to echo exactly what Republicans have been saying regarding the accusations against the current Republican president?? Or was it something else??

What do you think?