• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Disturbing and reckless': Retired brass spread election lie in attack on Biden

BlueTex said:
Want to try again? Trump was a CANDIDATE, not president when this letter was released.
Click to expand...

22 Retired 4-Stars Join Nearly 500 NatSec Leaders in Letter Endorsing Joe Biden

The open letter, published Thursday morning by National Security Leaders for Biden, contains 489 names.
www.military.com

"The next president will inherit a nation -- and a world -- in turmoil," the letter states. "The current President has demonstrated he is not equal to the enormous responsibilities of his office; he cannot rise to meet challenges large or small. Thanks to his disdainful attitude and his failures, our allies no longer trust or respect us, and our enemies no longer fear us."

But you don't care, do you? You want generals and ex-military to sign letters attacking any and all Republicans.
 

The Frauditors did it, believing they had the only copies. They were wrong. They went in there to create evidence of fraud where there was none. To raise doubt where there is none. To try to uncertifty the done and dusted.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Sounds like you can construct a coherent argument to counter what I'm saying, as usual.
Click to expand...

You made up an accusation and when asked for proof you said “John Ratcliffe also accused them!”

I’m sorry to inform you but accepting the word of John Ratcliffe isn’t a sign of a coherent argument.
 
It was proven. Shrug
 
Aunt Antifa said:
GOP claims of a stolen election! But you already knew that.
Click to expand...
How would I know what leftists mean by The Big Lie? They're always blowing smoke about one thing or another. What I can see is Democrats fighting every way they can to prevent any requested audits of the election.

Do you feel the Russia Hoax was a bigger lie or just a few fibs which continued over four years or so.?
 
So he was wrong on the amount of deleted data. Now perhaps we can move on as to why any data was deleted at all, a far more important matter.
 

Because you’ve been participating in these conversations for weeks. You’re being disingenuous.

I don’t feel the Russia “hoax” was a hoax or a lie. Mueller Vol 1 detailed collusion attempts, vol 2 detailed obstruction to hide that collusion. THen a bipartisan senate committee released a report stating that Trump’s campaign absolutely colluded with a Russian agent.

I can’t really answer your q because I don’t agree with its premise.
 
Amazing how easily you can analyze these people without ever having to interview them or even speak to them. Leftists seem to have a gift for reading evidence into nothing real whatsoever.
 
Given that 'collusion' is not illegal, do you genuinely feel that Donald Trump had been doing anything illegal with the Russian government, or their agents, in order to get elected. What was that? Did their 'dossier' play a part?
 
j-mac said:
Seems the support for these former officers who are clawing to remain relevant, depends on who's OX is being gored...
Click to expand...
The same might be said of anyone posting on this site.
 
Manc Skipper said:
The Frauditors did it, believing they had the only copies. They were wrong. They went in there to create evidence of fraud where there was none. To raise doubt where there is none. To try to uncertifty the done and dusted.
Click to expand...
Do you have any credible evidence to support your claim?
 
Aunt Antifa said:
You made up an accusation and when asked for proof you said “John Ratcliffe also accused them!”

I’m sorry to inform you but accepting the word of John Ratcliffe isn’t a sign of a coherent argument.
Click to expand...
So I give you multiple links, you think by calling one into question you have something, they quit giving the daily security briefing because it was being leaked.
 
“Concocting.”

Admiring your prejudice. See, it doesn’t matter what they found. You just FEEL there was nothing, so anything in the report must be false.

Nobody cares about your feelings.
 
rocket88 said:
They definitely spin it, but all you had to on 1/6 was watch what was happening to see what was happening.

You didn't. You just took the alt-right spin and excused it. Disgusting.
Click to expand...

You're absolutely right. We all watched a mostly peaceful protest.
 
Da Mole said:
You're absolutely right. We all watched a mostly peaceful protest.
Click to expand...

Hmmm....I didn't. Anybody with a halfway decent grasp on reality doesn't.

You won't be happy until we discard the Constitution and name Trump as Emperor. Don't worry, authoritarians always let you keep your guns.
 
rocket88 said:
Hmmm....I didn't. Anybody with a halfway decent grasp on reality doesn't.

You won't be happy until we discard the Constitution and name Trump as Emperor. Don't worry, authoritarians always let you keep your guns.
Click to expand...

Show us all that you have a "halfway decent grasp on reality". Paint the so called mostly peaceful protests that resulted throughout the country, in criminal behavior as riots. I'll be waiting.
 
Da Mole said:
Show us all that you have a "halfway decent grasp on reality". Paint the so called mostly peaceful protests that resulted throughout the country, in criminal behavior as riots. I'll be waiting.
Click to expand...
I have always called the riots riots. Sorry to kill your strawman.
 
They are quite right in their assessment and there is already evidence of them being right.
 
rocket88 said:
I have always called the riots riots. Sorry to kill your strawman.
Click to expand...
You have some credibility there but you're also the guy who said. "You won't be happy until we discard the Constitution and name Trump as Emperor".
 
Da Mole said:
In order to validate your view, you call it an insurrection whereas I see Jan 6th as a "mostly peaceful protest" A term faithfully used by the left when cities were looted and burned.
Click to expand...
Name ONE time the left used that term/phrase when cities were looted/burned.........you can't = you lose this debate
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…