• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Did Trump supporters get conned by Russians?

it was a thorough investigation

appears you simply disagree with its conclusion

unfortunately for you, those trained professionals who performed the investigation, the ones who saw the evidence, came to a valid conclusion

Dozens of those trained professionals resigned from the FBI because their politicized leader, Comey was short shrifting the investigation.
 
why is it that self proclaimed conservatioves prefer to ignore russia's intrusion into America's presidential election. are today's conservatives now aligned with putin's russia and its undemocratic government

I disagree that Russia's intrusion into the election, vis-a-vie the DNC hack, which may not be of Russian state origin.



Aside from this interview being on RT TV, it doesn’t mitigate the valid points that McAfee raises, which are all technical in their basis.

McAfee’s points:
  • Compiler date / time stamp in the malware executable code shows a Russian time zone. Why would a state sponsored hacking group leave that in?
  • The compiler date / time stamp in the malware executable code shows that this code was over 1 1/2 years of age when used. Why would a state sponsored hacking group not used the updated code?
  • Forensics analysis was determined that the coder used a Cyrillic keyboard to code the malware. Why would a state sponsored hacking group reduce the number of possible suspects by using a Cyrillic keyboard rather than the more prevalent and more popular English keyboard?
  • Why would a state sponsored hacking group use an IP address known to trace back to them?

These points are unavoidable and are technical in their basis and also cast serious doubt that a professional state sponsored hacking group executed this data breach. Are state sponsored hacking groups known for such amateurish mistakes? I think that state sponsored hacking groups would be far more diligent in obscuring any data in any of the malware left on penetrated systems that would leave clues that would lead back to them. You'd think that professional state sponsored hackers would be from more professional and far more careful about leaving traces that would lead back to them.
 
I disagree that Russia's intrusion into the election, vis-a-vie the DNC hack, which may not be of Russian state origin.



Aside from this interview being on RT TV, it doesn’t mitigate the valid points that McAfee raises, which are all technical in their basis.

McAfee’s points:
  • Compiler date / time stamp in the malware executable code shows a Russian time zone. Why would a state sponsored hacking group leave that in?
  • The compiler date / time stamp in the malware executable code shows that this code was over 1 1/2 years of age when used. Why would a state sponsored hacking group not used the updated code?
  • Forensics analysis was determined that the coder used a Cyrillic keyboard to code the malware. Why would a state sponsored hacking group reduce the number of possible suspects by using a Cyrillic keyboard rather than the more prevalent and more popular English keyboard?
  • Why would a state sponsored hacking group use an IP address known to trace back to them?

These points are unavoidable and are technical in their basis and also cast serious doubt that a professional state sponsored hacking group executed this data breach. Are state sponsored hacking groups known for such amateurish mistakes? I think that state sponsored hacking groups would be far more diligent in obscuring any data in any of the malware left on penetrated systems that would leave clues that would lead back to them. You'd think that professional state sponsored hackers would be from more professional and far more careful about leaving traces that would lead back to them.



an interview on russian tv dont cut it
 
an interview on russian tv dont cut it

It doesn't matter if it's on RT TV or not. The technical points McAfee raise, are independent of whether or not it's on RT TV or not.
The technical point he raises remain.

Either you can dispute those technical points, or you cannot. Which is it?
 
Hillary has committed multiple serious crimes. She has merely gotten away with them because she has been protected within the swamp that is Washington DC.

That's circular logic based on speculation.
 
nope, just facts

No...it's goofy left wing talking points. The rants of "fake news sites" only came about in the aftermath of Hillary Von Pantsuit losing the election. I have been following Slick Willy and Hillary Von Pantsuit's political careers since 1992. The scandals are numerous.
 
No...it's goofy left wing talking points. The rants of "fake news sites" only came about in the aftermath of Hillary Von Pantsuit losing the election. I have been following Slick Willy and Hillary Von Pantsuit's political careers since 1992. The scandals are numerous.


what you meant to say is the pretend scandals are numerous.
 
what you meant to say is the pretend scandals are numerous.

No you are pretending they do not exist. I'll just name couple. One old and one still ongoing. The white house travel office scandal: Hillary had the entire travel office fired while Billy Boy was president just so she could put her Hollywood producer friends (The Thomasons) in charge of it. To make the firings stick, she actually had the travel office staff brought up on criminal charges. They were easily acquitted and put back in charge of the travel office. One of the still ongoing scandals is her insanely stupid private email server and the classified emails she was sending and receiving on them. I can name many more, however I am sure that you get the point.
 

Irrelevant.

If the technical points that he's citing are accurate and correct, it still raises the question of why the hackers left all those clues which point to a single state sponsor.

It's either that the hackers left them on purpose to be a false trail, or that the hackers were so amateurish so as to have left them. Both cast legitimate doubts that the Russians were behind the DNC data breach.
 
Ya, and a lot of that was due to how Clinton Corp acted after the FBI director said that there might be something of interest on the Carlos Danger computer, that is to say guilty. Hillary is really really bad at this. D's should have their pitchforks out with what the elite in the party did to them, but too many are not that smart.

I would be more worried about the elites from Russia did to you. The coming train wreck will be the end of the GOP.
 
I would be more worried about the elites from Russia did to you. The coming train wreck will be the end of the GOP.

I want both parties to die, so in that case they did not do something to me, they did something for me.
 
Be careful what you wish for it may bite you in ass.

Failed systems and organizations need to be removed from the board.

The sooner the better, then get to work making something better.

Maybe it takes a few tries to get it right.

Maybe the process is painful.

Pain is the bestest teacher.

Life is not for the queasy.

Suck it up I say.
 
Last edited:
I would be more worried about the elites from Russia did to you. The coming train wreck will be the end of the GOP.

I seem to recall that the GOP primary election was going to be the end of the GOP. It didn't happen.

I seem to recall that the GOP candidate was going to lose to Hillary. That didn't happen.

I seem to recall that the GOP party was going to fragment and disintegrate. That didn't happen, but that IS what is happening to the Democrat party.

What did happen:

Obama’s legacy is a devastated Democratic Party
By Deroy Murdock, December 25, 2016
Obama’s legacy is a devastated Democratic Party | New York Post
As President Obama concludes his reign of error, his party is smaller, weaker and ricketier than it has been since at least the 1940s. Behold the tremendous power that Democrats have frittered away — from January 2009 through the aftermath of Election Day — thanks to Obama and his ideas:

  • Democrats surrendered the White House to political neophyte Donald J. Trump.
  • US Senate seats slipped from 55 to 46, down 16 percent.
  • US House seats fell from 256 to 194, down 24 percent.
  • Democrats ran the Senate and House in 2009. Next year, they will control neither.
  • Governorships slid from 28 to 16, down 43 percent.
  • State legislatures (both chambers) plunged from 27 to 14, down 48 percent
  • Trifectas (states with Democrat governors and both legislative chambers) cratered from 17 to 6, down 65 percent.

So pardon me while I laugh at your prediction.

Hope the Democratic party regains its footing.
It’s true. I do. Consider the following:
Stunning Graph Shows the Wrecking Ball Obama Has Taken to the Democrat Party
Matthew K. Burke November 13, 2016
Stunning Graph Shows the Wrecking Ball Obama Has Taken to the Democrat Party
He came in on the false promise of hope and change but America’s first Marxist president brought neither. He was a lifelong leftist community agitator and he governed like one, insisting on ruling America with newly discovered powers located not in the U.S. Constitution, but in his “pen and phone.”
He spent eight years spitting in the face of Americans, pulling the race card at all dissent, targeting patriotic Americans who disagreed with his USSR-like policies with the power of the IRS and other agencies.
He ridiculed Americans who believe in limited, constitutional government and individual liberty as “teabaggers” and accused people who live in rural America as being “bitter, they cling to guns or religion.
Obama’s banana republic rule has backfired and as the stunning graph below shows, Obama has taken a wrecking ball to the Democrat Party since he was elected in 2008.
Dems_2_Percent.jpg
The founders in their wisdom set up a system of self-governance which was built on the concept of checks and balances, hence the 3 branches of government with enumerated powers and limitations, and what evolved into a two-major party system. Checks and balances.

I don’t believe that its best for the nation to have a major party and a minor party, such as what the graph above would indicate, with one party having so much control where they could almost pass constitution amendments on their own. That much political power, that much control, is counter to the wisdom of check and balances.

Yes, I do hope the Democratic party regains its footing to restore checks and balances between the major political parties. It’s my opinion they won’t be able to do that continuing their careering ever further left. They need to come back to the center, as America is a center-right country.
 
Between the stolen emails and especially the "fake news", it seems like Trump supporters got totally conned by Russians. Now they, the Trump supporters and Trump himself, are tryiing to get us to believe it didn't make a difference. That is the biggest laugh of all. They should just fess up and say we got totally fooled. And now we have a president who is the stooge of the Commies, I mean the Russians. I have to also luagh about how many times I have read on political messsage boards how lefties are commies. Seems to me it is the other way around.

No, Trump supporters knew what Trump was all about. They went to his rallies and heard from him directly. They had specific issues that Trump spoke to, things that nobody else addressed. Or if Hillary tried to address them nobody believed her.

Hillary was still ahead until her "Deplorables" comment. That's where her own pollsters say her prospects went South. Did the Russians make her say that? Was that a Russian lie?

You want to take all of Hillary's myriad deficiencies and problems, everything from her dismal performance as Secretary of State to her money grubbing and corrupt practices with the Clinton Foundation, her snuggling up to Wall Street fat cats, her speaking out of both sides of her mouth, all of that, and shove that out of sight and make the Russian meddling the whole reason for her defeat. I call that pathetic.
 
No you are pretending they do not exist. I'll just name couple. One old and one still ongoing. The white house travel office scandal: Hillary had the entire travel office fired while Billy Boy was president just so she could put her Hollywood producer friends (The Thomasons) in charge of it. To make the firings stick, she actually had the travel office staff brought up on criminal charges. They were easily acquitted and put back in charge of the travel office. One of the still ongoing scandals is her insanely stupid private email server and the classified emails she was sending and receiving on them. I can name many more, however I am sure that you get the point.



yup, just right wing pretend
 
I would be more worried about the elites from Russia did to you. The coming train wreck will be the end of the GOP.

it is quite amusing to hear someone whose party has suffered a train wreck suggesting that the other party is headed for one.
 
it is quite amusing to hear someone whose party has suffered a train wreck suggesting that the other party is headed for one.

If you think the Obama economy is a train wreck, wait to you see what Trumps looks like.
 
Back
Top Bottom