- Joined
- Apr 29, 2012
- Messages
- 18,617
- Reaction score
- 9,264
- Location
- On an island. Not that one!
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
"...The response was that we can't expect to find any evidence of people wandering around in a desert"
Toilets. They track tribes in all areas by the waste they leave. Burials as well, usually markeed as such. Ther are none were there should be millions
A few words for those skeptics who believe that anti-Exodus commenters ain't got a clue -- Finding Evidence of Ancient Nomads
Recent research[1] has revealed that, contrary to earlier ideas,[2] nomads leave plenty of remains; finding them is simply a question of looking. We can now go beyond Holmes’s feat of simply dating the remains and noting their presence; archaeologists can make reasonable guesses about the nomadic seasonal round and about relations between nomads and their settled cousins. This kind of data is especially useful to Biblical archaeologists who study Iron Age settlements in the Negev that provide the background for the Israelites’ emergence in Canaan.[3]
1] https://www.baslibrary.org/biblical-archaeology-review/14/5/3/en/1?width=600
2] https://www.baslibrary.org/biblical-archaeology-review/14/5/3/en/2?width=600
For example, much of the implicit reasoning behind the Amorite nomadic explanation for the end of the Early Bronze Age was based on the assumption that nomads leave few remains. The original apparent relative scarcity of sites following Early Bronze III was thus taken a priori as evidence of the nomadic character of the invaders.3] https://www.baslibrary.org/biblical-archaeology-review/14/5/3/en/3?width=600