- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
The smart move for Trump would be to not go after Clinton at all. Just let her fade into irrelevancy.
yeah but let her think she might be indicted along with her scummy husband. Let her sweat for a while.
Her responsibility was for the security of her personnel. Their deaths are her responsibility whether you admit it or not.
And how would you this? Do you have some special secret powers? You are just like the rest of us, speculating, guessing, theorizing etc. On second thought, maybe not like the rest of us. You are foolish enough to act like your word carries some sort of factual weight... it doesn't....Hillary didn't intentionally give Top Secret info to people she knew had no business seeing it.
I definitely appreciate your point! My larger concern is justice--this is what must be served because we are a nation of laws.
I definitely appreciate your point! My larger concern is justice--this is what must be served because we are a nation of laws.
Yeah, they've learned that it wins presidential elections.
BTW, Hillary was not "persecuted", everything she has endured she brought upon herself. The only reason she hasn't been prosecuted, is because of a corrupt and morally bankrupt Obama "justice" dept.
I see now that you were talking about Bubba. But I'll leave my comments, because I still think they stand.
Wow. Ok. So by your logic the president is responsible for the safety of the US and it's citizens and Bush didn't stop 9/11 even though he rec'd unspecified warnings, so therefor he's responsible for all those deaths?
The state department has to choose where to place security and just because they didn't have quite enough in the right place at the right time it doesn't make Clinton some evil villain.
And quite frankly it's disgusting to see you use American lives for politics.
More of a Limbaugh guy?
yeah but let her think she might be indicted along with her scummy husband. Let her sweat for a while.
It would continue to make her relevant, do you Really want that? Just let her get on with her retirement.
She chose to ignore multiple specific warnings about security and requests for additional security. There are also multiple questions about assistance being sent that were never answered effectively.
hey with the threat hanging over her head, the press isn't going to be much different than if there was a pardon. Her petulant whining over the recount should have convinced Trump being magnanimous towards the lying bitch was a mistake
When you say assistance being sent are you referring to the night of the attack or prior to that.
And it's noted that you sidestepped my main point about how illogical you're reasoning is. You're only willing to assign responsibility of American deaths on our leaders when you can use it for political gain apparently. Disgusting.
Whats disgusting is the coverup that resulted after where we still don't have the truth of the events, and who knew what when and who ordered what when. Like I said, responsibility.
We have the truth. You're partisanship obviously won't let you accept that.
Gregg Jarrett of Fox News thinks Clinton has blown it:
While Clinton may be a smart person, it makes no sense whatsoever for her to risk criminal indictment by alienating the one person who can best insulate her from the legal consequences of her own extremely careless, if not intentional, conduct. And for what? A recount that is destined to fail?
By contesting the presidential election, Clinton does damage only to herself. When, during the election, Trump suggested he might not accept the result if he lost, Clinton called it “horrifying.” Did it ever occur to her that she is now committing the same “horrifying” act she so vehemently condemned? Gregg Jarrett: Did Hillary Clinton just squander her get out of jail free card? | Fox News
Jarrett thinks Clinton's gracious concession encouraged Trump to respond magnanimously but warns that when the recipient of a gift "exhibits a conspicuous lack of gratitude," that gift might be taken right back.
We will see.
Since more than half of the country is alongside what I'm saying regarding Benghazi and the cover up involved, I would say it isn't ALL partisanship. But I get you cant accept that, after all, it just cost your party the Presidency--I'd be pissed off and in denial, too.
The partisanship is widespread so it's not partisanship? What?
This is your admission that you believe President-Elect Trump is so petty that he will pervert the criminal justice system to get back at them.
Since more than half of the country is alongside what I'm saying regarding Benghazi and the cover up involved, I would say it isn't ALL partisanship. But I get you cant accept that, after all, it just cost your party the Presidency--I'd be pissed off and in denial, too.
When an opinion breaks outside of partisan divides, its not partisanship. So the opinion I voiced was not JUST partisanship. So dismissing it as just partisanship is false. Learn to logic, bro.
I'm unsure why you're trying to make this personal. You do not speak for me, and the one opinion I expressed was "We will see." I am admitting nothing and denying nothing; I am waiting to see what unfolds.
But are you saying that if President-Elect Trump appoints a special prosecutor, this is a perversion of the justice system? Really?
"Your" was intended as plural.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?