- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 35,319
- Reaction score
- 15,359
- Location
- Springfield MO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I'm just giving the same answer you gave about the Darwin scammers and abiogenesis.
Not at all. Evolutionary scientists ADMIT that there are still questions to be answered and “working on it” is how science is done, but they have EVIDENCE for their theories and they don’t just state them and claim that’s the end of it, like ID supporters do. I have repeatedly asked you to “go into the weeds” a bit about so-called ID theory, but you absolutely refuse to discuss it in any depth at all, such as to show who or what the “intelligent designer” is, and immediately pivot to evolution denial. Dozens, probably hundreds, of peer reviews papers are written each year regarding evolution. That’s how science is done, telling about research. On the other hand, there is ZERO research into ID. There is the watchmaker analogy, AND THAT’S IT!
So I’ll try again. Who or what is the “intelligent designer”?