- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
We haven't even seen the full effects of this oil spill but we can be sure that's it's comparable to the worst natural disaster in the history of the country? Is that really what you're saying?
Lol, what's you're problem with women? Do you really think so little of women that it should degrade a man to be compared to one?
Read your last post and decipher for yourself who's really whining, lol. :shrug:
Is anyone surprised that the "blame Obama like the liberals blamed Bush for Katrina" line has already emerged? I'm surprised it didn't happen sooner.
Why is it, Obama gets a pass for the failure to implement the 1994 plan while bush gets the blame for FEMA's failures?
I'm less interested in this because the government should've been involved in this and much more interested in the media response. Katrina was greatly laid on Bush in the media with far less attention given to the Mayor and Governor outside of conservative channels, yet here all you keep hearing is "BP should've done this". Where are the sensationalized stories about what Obama was doing while this disaster was happening like the ones we got with Bush on the Ranch.
First find someone who has actually said that, then you can start talking about hypocrisy.
I'm actually suprised at the blatant hypocrisy and disregard for the environment you all are displaying to protect your god king.
What hypocrisy? What exactly have I said about Obama, or Bush, and their respective responsibilities for these disasters? Quote me.
Right, what grade to you give obama in tis disaster?
Does he hold any responsibility in the failure of the federal government to implement its 1994 plan?
I won't bother, because even if I did, you would't see it pass all your mouth foam. besides, I asked you directly. Please answer the question.
Why is it, Obama gets a pass for the failure to implement the 1994 plan while bush gets the blame for FEMA's failures?
Is anyone surprised that the "blame Obama like the liberals blamed Bush for Katrina" line has already emerged? I'm surprised it didn't happen sooner.
Obama get's blame for not having fire booms on hand. You're right. Other than that they've done a great job with the problem, especially considering the terrible weather that hasn't helped in the least.
Bush gets blame for the metric ****-ton of stuff that went wrong during and after Katrina, including the lack of funding and the missalocation of funds that were supposed to help rebuild. Trying to compare the two is ridiculous.
I really blame Bush for his idiot decision of giving those nee'rdowells those checks for $2000 to help them buy food, clothing, and help them get back on their feet. How many lap dances and hookers did that cost us taxpayers?
Funny, I never heard that
Besides with no fire booms available, The Obama Administration has failed at least as much as the Bush administration has failed with Katrina.
They should, but unlike you, I am not willing to destroy thousands of miles of gulf coast and entire fishing industries to punish "big oil". :shrug:
You should read the news more often.
Burning the Oil Off? Weather Is the Hitch - Green Blog - NYTimes.com
How is not having equipment you can't use a failure?
LOL. Your pedestrian attack needs work.
May 3rd, thats 14 days too late. Sorry. the weather excuse does not measure up 14 days later. :shrug:
April 28? 8 days later they are saying the weather would deteriorate, indicating the weather was fine those 8 days.
10 days later. :shrug:
As I have proven by your links, they had about 14 days to use this equipment.
Well then, please explain why you are making excuses for this government, when clearly I have proven they screwed the pooch on this one.
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/data/realtime2/42887.txt
FAIL.
The biggest reason you "win" any argument is that people don't put the time in to getting the hard data to prove you're wrong. Took me some time to find that off NOAA's website. Check the 9th column from the left. Pretty much every day after the accident wave action prevented burn offs.
Try again. Unless you want to argue that NOAA is a socialistic evil liberal organization. :2wave:
You really outta to stop getting your information from blogs.
Only if you ignore the actual data. Btw, before you embarrass yourself again, that's meters, not feet for the unit of measure in the 9th column
uhm, am I missing something? its under 3 meters for several of those days, which is less than 3 feet, the maximum you claim these things work at, though you haven't backed it up.
:2razz:
uhm, am I missing something? its under 3 feet on several days, the maximum you claim these things work at, though you haven't backed it up.
Now your being obtuse with a moronic strawman. Why would I suggest NOAA is a socialistic evil organization?
there are several days where the waves are below 3 feet to which is the number you claimed, that I have yet to see proof. :shrug:
:lol:
mmy bad... MATH FAIL!!!!
Don't tell OC, he'll mouth foam at me for a year over that. :lol:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?