Errr it was from 2000 to 2008.. what changed?
Hopining Obama fails does not equal America failing.
Putting the olympics over the troops in A-stan?
That's "hoping America fails"
Obama is not "America"
I have to laugh at the efforts to re-define what Socialist or Communist means or the efforts to suggest that the "pure" form has never been attempted.
Unfortunately for the Communist apologizers, there is no such thing as a "pure" form of political ideologies because you cannot ignore the HUMAN factor when it comes to such centralized systems which are why they fail so miserably.
I have to laugh at the attempts of Socialists to continue to re-invent Socialism in an effort to suggest that it is a better form of political/economic ideology which still has not been tried in its "pure" form.
Fortunately most of us live in the REAL world and have a collective memory of the epoch failure of such "feel good" social systems and can watch them in their current forms throughout the world fail.
What amazes me is how anyone with an education and modicum of intelligence about human behavior can continue to argue for such systems or even suggest that they can work. :doh
True that. But it seems just like yesterday when the left was wanting our troops out of Iraq the right was screaming, "The left wants our troops to fail," or, "The left wants America to lose the war!" Or some other rhetoric like that.
Yea, I bet you never tried to undermine the war in Iraq...not even once.
Is this necessary?
Rev:
Were you as outraged at how many we lost in Iraq when GWB attended the Beijing Olympics?
How many posts did you post about that?
Link?
True that. But it seems just like yesterday when the left was wanting our troops out of Iraq the right was screaming, "The left wants our troops to fail," or, "The left wants America to lose the war!" Or some other rhetoric like that. Or the left whining about GWB reading the Little Goat Book as the towers blazed.
Now, the shoe is on the other foot.
Gawd, we need some NEW political writers. This political drama is getting so predictable and boring. I am coming to think that there are more whackos than intelligent people these days. (But I know better.)
Irrellevant.
What decision were troops waiting on being shot at while he attended? FAIL
However, I thought bush made a huge mistake attending the chinese olympics, for numerous reasons.
Irrelevant? Because it doesn't neatly fit within your selective outrage?
:doh
Just curious:
How far into The Obama's tenure will you contninue to blame Bush?
At what point do you lay the blame at The Obama's feet?
Assume The Obama has 2 full terms and is then replaced by a Republican.2 or 3 years.
Wait......but since Bush orientated the country in a certain direction for eight years, and because it is impossible to retract that motion or re-set the course without difficulty, it is Bush's destiny to get blamed for the fall out of his policies.
Assume The Obama has 2 full terms and is then replaced by a Republican.
Does that mean the Republicans get to blame The Obama for 2 or three years for the mess He made?
Dont dodge the question.On what international/global scale has Obama "messed up" anything? Seems to me almost all of his efforts thus far have been to clean up the mess left by someone else.
Given that "messes things up" is an entirely subjective standard, I'll then take you answer to agree that the Republicans get to blame The Obama for 2 or three years for the mess He made.If and when President Obama effs things up the way Bush did, you'll have a point. Until then, the question is moot.
Given that "messes things up" is an entirely subjective standard, I'll then take you answer to agree that the Republicans get to blame The Obama for 2 or three years for the mess He made.
Assume The Obama has 2 full terms and is then replaced by a Republican.
Does that mean the Republicans get to blame The Obama for 2 or three years for the mess He made?
What part of "Given that 'messes things up' is an entirely subjective standard" don't YOU get?If and when President Obama effs things up the way Bush did, you'll have a point. Until then, the question is moot.
What part of If do you not understand? :roll:
Things beng FUBAR is subjective, and is determined those leveling the criticism.Of course they can. What if on the hand nothing is FUBAR will Republicans give credit where credit is due?
What part of "Given that 'messes things up' is an entirely subjective standard" don't YOU get?
Its no more or less subjective than yours, as you have so aptly demonstrated.Duh. It's YOUR subjective standard.
Its no more or less subjective than yours, presently, as you have so aptly demonstrated.
Thus:
Given that "messes things up" is an entirely subjective standard, I'll then take you answer to agree that the Republicans get to blame The Obama for 2 or three years for the mess He made.
Sometimes for levity. When you see the god complex, sometimes it needs to be pointed out. :shrug:
On the contrary -- I understand perfectly well.Your inability to comprehend English is duly noted.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?