• We will be taking the forum down at 6:30 AM CST for maintenance. Please try back later
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dems: Benghazi panel has 'abandoned' its work to focus on Hillary[W:54]

In your opinion - which couldn't possibly be because none of them have found support for what you KNOW to be TRUE about that evil Kenyan, Marxist, secret Muslim and the woman who is still married to the blow-job guy.

Is this the best you can do? Erecting strawmen in your field of corn?

You say I "KNOW to be true" these things...I challenge you to prove your contention. Provide one single post from me saying I know any of this to be true.

Until you do, Somerville, I'll stick with what I DO know: You are one of the most worthless people here on DP with which to have a conversation.
 
:lamo How so? See post #49

Oversight Committee Details State Department Efforts to Obstruct Benghazi Investigation in 37 Page Letter to Select Committee

Among the topics covered in the 37 page letter covering the Oversight investigation from September 2012 until May 2014:

The Committee’s early attempts beginning in September 2012 to obtain voluntary cooperation from the Department
The Department’s repeated promises to cooperate, but continued failure to actually meet requests
The Department’s efforts to hide important documents behind a talking point that it had made 25,000 pages available
The Department’s wasteful efforts to cart documents in and out daily instead of turning them over to the Oversight Committee
The Committee’s eventual decision in 2013 to issue subpoenas
The State Department’s refusal to make all documents made available to and created by the Accountability Review Board (ARB) empanelled and selected by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
State Department threats to destroy Committee property necessary for internal organization of in camera documents
Abusive State Department document redaction practices
Department unwillingness to cooperatively make witnesses available
State Department efforts to selectively withhold and produce documents to support a pre-determined agency narrative
Efforts to use the Justice Department as excuse for non-cooperation
Possibly illegal efforts to retroactively classify documents to prevent their release

Oversight Committee Details State Department Efforts to Obstruct Benghazi Investigation in 37 Page Letter to Select Committee « Congressman Darrell Issa

Now, this letter is from a year ago and only concerns the State Department. Hillary and the rest of the Obama administration all have their own sets of obstructionist tactics...including withholding and destruction of emails by Clinton.


As I said...GIGO perfectly describes EVERY Benghazi investigation to date...no matter who performed it.
 
55,000 pages wasnt enough! We need more emails! More emails!

But hey its not like this attack was investigated by the independent State Department Accountability Review Board, the Senate Intelligence Committee, the Senate Armed Services Committee, the House Intelligence Committee, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, the House Armed Services Committee, the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform, and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. None of these probes uncovered evidence to substantiate right-wing conspiracy theories. But hey, lets just keep on doing "redos" because we are here for the "truth"! :roll:

Its not like they have scheduled 11 hearings since January and ONE, ONE OF THEM have actually happened....

Republicans Abandon Plan for Benghazi Hearings to Focus on Clinton | Select Committee on Benghazi, Democrats

But keep it up. You'll find the "truth" you are looking for even if you have to pull it out of your ass.

Great work committee! Really showing yourself to be efficient and sticking to your schedule!

The number of pages is meaningless. That's just a document dump intended to delay the proceeding. A complete relevant record is. Hillary is not trustworthy.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Stop insulting each other and debate the OP. Otherwise, this thread is going to have fewer participants.
 
The number of pages is meaningless. That's just a document dump intended to delay the proceeding. A complete relevant record is. Hillary is not trustworthy.

Wait. So they want the emails, but when they are given them its just a "delay to the proceeding"? :doh
You have to be joking... :lamo
 
I don't think anyone will find anything unlawful from the Benghazi investigation, That's not the point. The point is to find out why it happened, how we responded and how we can avoid situations like that in the future. Hillary is stonewalling the investigation because she was a lousy Sec. of State and she doesn't want a spotlight shown on that fact while she wants to be president.

So you agree with Hillary?

"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they'd they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. "

If so, I agree with both of you.
 
So you agree with Hillary?

"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they'd they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. "

If so, I agree with both of you.

The problem is, though, that both Hillary and Obama are doing everything they can to prevent anyone from figuring out what happened.

Case in point is her rhetoric of these maybe just being some guys out for a walk. LOL!!
 
So you agree with Hillary?

"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they'd they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. "

If so, I agree with both of you.

Look carefully at the snake oil Hillary Clinton is trying to sell you:

"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they'd they go kill some Americans? "

No Hillary, you're lying through your teeth. You were the one trans-shipping arms from Libya to Syria in violation of both international and domestic law.

You are the reason Benghazi happened.

(You lying sack of .... dung.... )

[I"What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. "

Hillary, you lying .... dog.... you know exactly what happened. We proved that already, in spite of your lies. We proved beyond any shadow of a doubt that you knew from at least five different sources, within hours of the attack, exactly what happened.

Yet you are the one who came to the table with that bullsh*t story about the video.

Hillary is a witch from hell. There is no way she should be anywhere near the reins of power in this country. Everything she's ever touched has turned to complete sh*t.
 
Judge slams State Department over Hillary Clinton-related records - POLITICO

At a contentious hearing last week, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon demanded explanations for why some of the AP's requests received no reply for four years or more before the wire service filed suit in March.
Leon said he was determined to establish "what has been going on in the State Department for four years dragging their feet, not addressing these issues for four years."
"I want to find out what's been going on over there. I should say, what's not been going on over there," the judge added. "The State Department, for reasons known only to itself ... has been, to say the least, recalcitrant in responding."

Leon accused Olson of responding with "convoluted gobbledygook" when she insisted that the State Department's processing of those emails would satisfy the AP's request for records about Clinton Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin's transition to a special part-time position at State.

"What you just said, Ms. Olson, made no sense," the judge replied. "You're failing to distinguish between documents created by the State Department independently of Hillary Clinton's emails — with Hillary Clinton's emails. And you're giving me some kind of convoluted gobbledygook. about how the emails contain within them the independently created documents relating to Huma Abedin's appointment as a special government counsel. ...That is nonsensical."

Despite Leon's amazement at the four-year delay in the AP's FOIA requests to State, the wire service is not alone. A request POLITICO filed in November 2009 about State's approval process for former President Bill Clinton's paid speeches and business deals didn't produce any records until February 2014. The agency began to release records only after a conservative group, Judicial Watch, filed suit over a similar request."


Just sayin.
 
I don't think anyone will find anything unlawful from the Benghazi investigation, That's not the point. The point is to find out why it happened, how we responded and how we can avoid situations like that in the future. Hillary is stonewalling the investigation because she was a lousy Sec. of State and she doesn't want a spotlight shown on that fact while she wants to be president.

I agree. I also think that in avoiding the investigation crimes were committed. It is always the cover up that gets them.
 
Federal Judge: State Department Will ‘Answer For’ Destruction of Clinton Emails | Washington Free Beacon

U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras said he was “concerned” about the preservation of crucial documents in the Hillary Clinton email acquisition process, according to documents obtained by Judicial Watch.

“If documents are destroyed between now and August 17, the government will have to answer for that, and, you know, if they don’t want to do anything out of the ordinary to preserve [them] between now and then, they can make that choice,” Contreras said in a status conference.
“I will allow them to make that choice, but they will answer for it if something happens.”

Judge Contreras went on to voice his concerns regarding the State Department’s lack of cooperation to provide further information about the Clinton emails.
“I am a little bit mystified that the government is not more forthcoming in just answering questions that will help this case proceed on a systematic basis, and on a basis that will allow everyone to get the answers that will eventually help resolve these cases,” Contreras said.


More transparency.
 
So you agree with Hillary?

"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they'd they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. "

I doubt that I agree with Hillary about much. It makes a difference. You highlighted why it makes a difference in my pr
If so, I agree with both of you.

evious post. The issue is that while Hillary gives lip service to wanting to find solutions to what went wrong in Benghazi, she is impeding the investigation. She was a terrible Sec. of State, a lousy Senator and a first lady who put up with a philandering husband for the sake of power and a prestigious address. I don't understand why anyone supports her.
 
Wait. So they want the emails, but when they are given them its just a "delay to the proceeding"? :doh
You have to be joking... :lamo

You think she turned over all the emails even though they discovered emails between her and Sidney Blumenthal that weren't in her 50.000 pages. You've got to be kidding.
 
This is going to be fun for a few months.
Judge rejects State Dept. plan for Hillary Clinton emails, sets timetable for release
Judge rejects State Dept. plan for Hillary Clinton emails, sets timetable for release - Washington Times

Judge Rudolph Contreras gave the department until the end of January to complete the production of all 30,000 emails, which means the final messages will be released about the same time Mrs. Clinton, who is seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, prepares to face voters.

The State Department had asked that it have 60 days between releases, and didn’t give any targets for how much would be released each time, but Judge Contreras rejected that proposal and set out a firm timeline.

By June 30, the department must release 7 percent of the emails, totaling 2,100 messages; then release 2,400 more by the end of July; 3,000 more in August; 3,600 in September; 4,200 in October; 4,500 in November; 4,800 in December; and the final 5,400 or so in January.


It isn't Trey Gowdy that created this timeline. It isn't Trey Gowdy that stonewalled and caused this delay. It isn't Trey Gowdy that erased the emails on the illegal server, regardless of what was on those emails.

So, at the end of every month until January we will relive the pain and misery and delight in the release of each batch of emails. The last release was quite enlightening.
 
I agree. I also think that in avoiding the investigation crimes were committed. It is always the cover up that gets them.

There is unquestionably Obstruction of Justice involved. Hillary even admitted it. That is a felony and an impeachable offense. Hillary could have impeachment papers waiting for her if she ever gets to the White House.

(First there's that little problem with Donald Trump though)... ;)
 
There is unquestionably Obstruction of Justice involved. Hillary even admitted it. That is a felony and an impeachable offense. Hillary could have impeachment papers waiting for her if she ever gets to the White House.

(First there's that little problem with Donald Trump though)... ;)

I think Trump is only a problem for the liberals and the establishment Republicans.

Hillary doesn't need to worry, though. She'll never be impeached...even if by some miracle she becomes President.
 
There is unquestionably Obstruction of Justice involved. Hillary even admitted it. That is a felony and an impeachable offense. Hillary could have impeachment papers waiting for her if she ever gets to the White House.

(First there's that little problem with Donald Trump though)... ;)

I have been thinking about that the past few weeks. A person gets elected president and then gets impeached. Only problem is the AG is as corrupt as they get and would fight it/refuse to take action. If they lose the election all hell is going to break loose. If that happens I am going to enjoy every freaking second of it.

It would be the first husband wife team to ever get impeached. if she were elected and the Congress could force an impeachment.
 
Back
Top Bottom