democrats, why do you want to end America?

[Uncensored2008]

The goal of the the democrats through the radical leftism of the Harris/Xiden campaign with the Green Raw Deal, court packing, socializing the economy, etc. is to end America as it has existed since 1789.

My question to the democrats is why do you want to end America? Is it the desire of something for nothing? A belief that you can gain power over those you hate and inflict revenge? A hatred for life itself?

What is the reason for the desire to end our Constitution, Bill of Rights, free market, and individualism?

 

[Airyaman]

 

[Uncensored2008]

I suppose that is about as intelligent of an answer as I would expect from any democrat,

 

[Somerville]

The goal of the the democrats through the radical leftism of the Harris/Xiden campaign with the Green Raw Deal, court packing, socializing the economy, etc. is to end America as it has existed since 1789.

My question to the democrats is why do you want to end America? Is it the desire of something for nothing? A belief that you can gain power over those you hate and inflict revenge? A hatred for life itself?

What is the reason for the desire to end our Constitution, Bill of Rights, free market, and individualism?

Only in the minds of the willfully ignorant can the Democratic candidates be viewed as "radical leftists". A near total ignorance of history along with an unwillingness to learn from the experiences of other nations is the primary cause of such weirdness. IMO

 

[Uncensored2008]

Only in the minds of the willfully ignorant can the Democratic candidates be viewed as "radical leftists". A near total ignorance of history along with an unwillingness to learn from the experiences of other nations is the primary cause of such weirdness. IMO

{ The Green New Deal resolution also includes other leftist policy priorities, such as guarantees of “high-quality health care,” “safe, affordable, and adequate housing,” and “economic security.” The resolution doesn’t explicitly state this, but the FAQs document states that the federal government will provide “economic security” to those who are “unwilling to work.” This is socialism. If you’re completely able-bodied, but you’re too lazy to work, the producers in the economy -- well, the few who are left under the Green New Deal -- will pick up your tab. That’s not okay. }

The Green New Deal Is Communist Manifesto, 21st Century | RealClearMarkets

A 21st-century take on Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Communist Manifesto was introduced in the form of a nonbinding resolution introduced by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ed...

www.realclearmarkets.com

I'm sorry, you were saying?

 

[vegas giants]

Why do republicans want to end all life in the known universe?????

 

[Irwin Corey]

I suppose that is about as intelligent of an answer as I would expect from any democrat,

It was a better answer than your biased OP deserved.

 

[Airyaman]

I suppose that is about as intelligent of an answer as I would expect from any democrat,

Urban Dictionary: Hair on Fire

Hair on Fire: 1) The event used to describe when the [threshold] of creativity has been [crossed over] into insanity 2) The event used to describe the exact...

www.urbandictionary.com

 

[vegas giants]

It was a better answer than your biased OP deserved.

I think the democrats are going to need to find a weakness in the death star the republicans are building

 

[Chillfolks]

Democrats don't want to end America they have a different vision of what America should be.

 

[mike2810]

{ The Green New Deal resolution also includes other leftist policy priorities, such as guarantees of “high-quality health care,” “safe, affordable, and adequate housing,” and “economic security.” The resolution doesn’t explicitly state this, but the FAQs document states that the federal government will provide “economic security” to those who are “unwilling to work.” This is socialism. If you’re completely able-bodied, but you’re too lazy to work, the producers in the economy -- well, the few who are left under the Green New Deal -- will pick up your tab. That’s not okay. }

The Green New Deal Is Communist Manifesto, 21st Century | RealClearMarkets

A 21st-century take on Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Communist Manifesto was introduced in the form of a nonbinding resolution introduced by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ed...

www.realclearmarkets.com

I'm sorry, you were saying?

Not sure I would accept an editorial as being totally factual and unbiased.
Jason Pye is the vice president of legislative affairs for FreedomWorks.
Do you have any other sources to try and support your point than Pye or other similar authors?

The US already provides a certain amount of "economic security" does it not?
There are items in both Party platforms I do not agree with. Whoever wins the election will still have to get Congressional approval for much of what is on the platforms.

 

[Irwin Corey]

I think the democrats are going to need to find a weakness in the death star the republicans are building

It's not the Republicans I worry about, it's the plutocrats that control Trump and want to make him their President for life that are the real threat.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not sure I would accept an editorial as being totally factual and unbiased.
Jason Pye is the vice president of legislative affairs for FreedomWorks.
Do you have any other sources to try and support your point than Pye or other similar authors?

The US already provides a certain amount of "economic security" does it not?
There are items in both Party platforms I do not agree with. Whoever wins the election will still have to get Congressional approval for much of what is on the platforms.

Irrelevant.

The complaint was stating that democrats are radical left, the editorial demonstrates that they are, regardless of whether one agrees with the content of the editorial.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Democrats don't want to end America they have a different vision of what America should be.

That vision can be seen in Venezuela or North Korea. But that does in fact end America. We may retain the name, but the Constitutional Republic will be gone.

 

[Decypher]

The goal of the the democrats through the radical leftism of the Harris/Xiden campaign with the Green Raw Deal, court packing, socializing the economy, etc. is to end America as it has existed since 1789.

My question to the democrats is why do you want to end America? Is it the desire of something for nothing? A belief that you can gain power over those you hate and inflict revenge? A hatred for life itself?

What is the reason for the desire to end our Constitution, Bill of Rights, free market, and individualism?

Turn off talk radio, my friend and try thinking for yourself. Biden and Harris are centrists, endorsed by Wall St.

 

[vegas giants]

That vision can be seen in Venezuela or North Korea. But that does in fact end America. We may retain the name, but the Constitutional Republic will be gone.

Once we institute the reeducation camps you will feel better

 

[Chillfolks]

That vision can be seen in Venezuela or North Korea. But that does in fact end America. We may retain the name, but the Constitutional Republic will be gone.

The chicken little routine is getting old

 

[mike2810]

Irrelevant.

The complaint was stating that democrats are radical left, the editorial demonstrates that they are, regardless of whether one agrees with the content of the editorial.

the article being an editorial is an opinion.

Let me ask you this. Are all Republicans radical ri

Irrelevant.

The complaint was stating that democrats are radical left, the editorial demonstrates that they are, regardless of whether one agrees with the content of the editorial.

Let me ask you this. Are all Republicans members of the Tea Party?
I find it interesting that you are identifying all Democrats as "radical left". That is not true. As it is not true that all Republicans are the same.
The only true fact about your linked article is it is an opinion editorial. Nothing more , nothing less.

 

[Somerville]

Irrelevant.

The complaint was stating that democrats are radical left, the editorial demonstrates that they are, regardless of whether one agrees with the content of the editorial.

No, the editorial demonstrates the mindset of what some might call a radical libertarian view of political opponents. A view which sadly appears to have only a minimal connection with reality.

 

[Tigerace117]

The goal of the the democrats through the radical leftism of the Harris/Xiden campaign with the Green Raw Deal, court packing, socializing the economy, etc. is to end America as it has existed since 1789.

My question to the democrats is why do you want to end America? Is it the desire of something for nothing? A belief that you can gain power over those you hate and inflict revenge? A hatred for life itself?

What is the reason for the desire to end our Constitution, Bill of Rights, free market, and individualism?

Trump cultist, why do you want to turn America into Nazi Germany, Pinochet’s Chile, Francoist Spain and Mussolini’s Italy?

 

[HIP56948]

Democrats/Progressives just want to make the USA fair, honest, happy and kind...something Republicans know little about...

 

[azgreg]

Pretty stupid thread. Not surprised it was started by a Trumper.

 

[Aletheia]

I'm sure the OP rant was the same rant we heard when questioning blacks counting as 3/5 of whites.
Things change over time, they are not static.
The goal should be to evolve to the best system over time.

 

[OscarLevant]

The goal of the the democrats through the radical leftism of the Harris/Xiden campaign with the Green Raw Deal, court packing, socializing the economy, etc. is to end America as it has existed since 1789.

My question to the democrats is why do you want to end America? Is it the desire of something for nothing? A belief that you can gain power over those you hate and inflict revenge? A hatred for life itself?

What is the reason for the desire to end our Constitution, Bill of Rights, free market, and individualism?

Incompetent thread.

Incompetent rebuttals are arguments [are] where the salient premise is based on: [highlighted pertains to your comment] non arguments, a non argument isn't really debatable, they come in many different flavors, especially those which contain vacuous (unsubstantiated) declarations, rebuttals rife with weasel words ( improper use of generalities such as 'some people are saying' 'everyone knows' 'well-established fact'.) ad hominems, loaded terms & phrases,, off topic and irrelevant deflections, sentiments (words that indication emotional attitude) off point arguments/deflections (off point is a sibling to off topic, where off topic is attempting to highjack the thread. It's done a lot in internet forums, and if the person to whom you directed the topic change accepts it, then you're off into a new direction, but, as such, of course, doesn't refute the original premise offered), 'kill the messenger" tactics, i.e., attacking the person presenting the argument rather than the argument, itself ( the only time kill the messenger is valid is for a well-established discredited source, such as Alex Jones, David Duke, etc, ), childish remarks, trivialising your opponent's argument -- cheap shot, comments arising from ignorance (for example, NYTimes is a 'radical leftist rag' -- that's a remark born out of ignorance, it's also an 'kill the messenger' tactic) and then there is the classic thought-terminating cliché; these are cult-tropes, born out of groups who have a demagogue leader who is the master of implanting them in his flock. See, the demagogue doesn't like dissent, so when anyone challenges someone in his flock, he, being a master mind manipulator, will have planted a number of thought-terminating clichés into the minds of his subjects ( via repetition) so they will toss it up to the opponent in an attempt to kill the conversation ( wrongfully thinking it improves their argument ) so TTCs are simple terms catch phrases or words whose sole purpose is, to kill the conversation, such as 'TDS' "NeverTrumper" "Leftist Loony" (noting that the terms are not necessarily devised by the demagogue himself, they could be created by other believers, or have already been around and adopted by and they catch on with the group ) etc. last, but not least, and a significant debate sin, is posturing; posturing type comments, come in two basic categories, one is where you flaunt, i.e, for example, your military service, but of course if the argument can be improved by your qualifications of expertise in a field, that is okay, what I mean is something like 'I served while you were dodging the draft" whereupon your service doesn't improve your argument about whether dodging the draft was moral, or not, or flaunting your education, or authority of some kind, unless it's pertinent to the argument, and the other type of posturing are those comments which are motivated by puffing oneself up, and this is done by shaming, belittling, mocking, patronizing, 'mansplaining', flaming, where one talks down to ones opponent in order to puff oneself up,

bad arguments
Are those with an assumed premise, egregious logical fallacies (the operative word being 'egregious' ) and misuse of logic terms (calling something, for example, a 'slippery slope fallacy' which it isn't actually a slippery slope fallacy, or one of the known logical fallacies), simplisticism, ( reducing an argument beyond the threshold where it can be simplified, ie., oversimplified to an extent the premise is no longer viable, The best study of bad arguments are those that violate the Carl Sagan Baloney Detection Kit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Turn off talk radio, my friend and try thinking for yourself. Biden and Harris are centrists, endorsed by Wall St.

As long as the center is defined by Mao Tse Tung, that's true.

It is telling that democrats could try and pass off a radical like Harris as "center." If WIllie Brown's little love muffin looks hundreds of miles to her right, she might catch a glimpse of George McGovern...