• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats Touting AOC for President in 2020. Can Anybody IMAGINE This Imbecile Becoming President?

Mashmont said:
Well, let's take it slow for you. The election talked about in the article is 2024, and Inauguration Day from that election will be 2025. 2020 is not mentioned in the article at all. Got it now?
Click to expand...

Irrelevant. People were responding to your posts, and you clearly had 2020 in mind when you wrote post #9. It's still there. Still says 2020. Your words.

Now you're trying to distract and confuse the issue, rather than just owning your typo.

You're a prime example of why I could never be a Christian. I've met too many of you lot that are double-talking liars.
 
ashurbanipal said:
Irrelevant. People were responding to your posts, and you clearly had 2020 in mind when you wrote post #9. It's still there. Still says 2020. Your words.

Now you're trying to distract and confuse the issue, rather than just owning your typo.

You're a prime example of why I could never be a Christian. I've met too many of you lot that are double-talking liars.
Click to expand...

Just admit you didn't read the article.
 
Mashmont said:
So you thought the article said 2020 when you read it?
Click to expand...

“What? She can’t?” Mandelberger asked. “How old is she?”

When she was informed of Ocasio-Cortez’s age, Mandelberger was impressed.

“Good for her. Oh, my God,” she said.
 
Mashmont said:
So you thought the article said 2020 when you read it?
Click to expand...

No, I thought the article said exactly what it said....which is that its ridiculous that she can't run next year.

To be honest, I think it was really less about AOC than the requirements thing, but maybe that was just me. She was a case, not the point.
 
Mashmont said:
There is nobody here who thought the article meant she was running next year. If you would have just said "OK. I miscalculated", it would be easier to respect you.
Click to expand...

Unclear as to what you thought. What is clear is that you wrote the year "2020" in post number 9, and so people in this thread had reason to believe that you believed it. It's fine if you mis-typed. But you should just own that and move on.
 
ashurbanipal said:
Unclear as to what you thought. What is clear is that you wrote the year "2020" in post number 9, and so people in this thread had reason to believe that you believed it. It's fine if you mis-typed. But you should just own that and move on.
Click to expand...

**** that.....hes goin' ride or die on this ****.
 
Mashmont said:
I trust you will apologize the moment you find out you're wrong? Will you have the decency to do that?
Click to expand...

No. I wont find out the opposite. Shes not eligible to run, period.

Jesus christ you folks.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
And you take the notion of AOC running seriously? Who’s the dimbulb here?

* Not that it matters at all, but AOC isn’t even old enough to meet the minimum age requirement.

Another Mashmont thread fail.
Click to expand...

AOC is too far to the left economically for me to consider voting for her in a hypothetical presidential primary, but the prospect of making fascists' heads explode at the sound of President AOC does make me reconsider. :lol:
 
Mashmont said:
1) People said the same thing when she was running for Congress, and look what happened. What makes you think these same Marxists won't try to fool people again, but on a larger scale?
2) She will be old enough to run in 2020. You may apologize at any time.
Click to expand...

That is freaking hilarious.


Basic math fail. Lol
 
Mashmont said:
1) People said the same thing when she was running for Congress, and look what happened. What makes you think these same Marxists won't try to fool people again, but on a larger scale?
2) She will be old enough to run in 2020. You may apologize at any time.
Click to expand...
More lying ridiculousness.

What “people” said AOC wasn’t age eligible to run for Congress?

And no, AOC will not be old enough to run for president in 2020.
56615851-59D2-405C-A34D-34B1C195A319.webp
 
If AOC wins in 2024, she will be the youngest President. I plan to vote for her.

AOC Dancing.webp
 
Phys251 said:
AOC is too far to the left economically for me to consider voting for her in a hypothetical presidential primary, but the prospect of making fascists' heads explode at the sound of President AOC does make me reconsider. :lol:
Click to expand...
Amen, brother!
 
RaleBulgarian said:
And you take the notion of AOC running seriously? Who’s the dimbulb here?

* Not that it matters at all, but AOC isn’t even old enough to meet the minimum age requirement.

Another Mashmont thread fail.
Click to expand...

When did Democrats ever care about the Constitution or law? They don't care about immigration law. They want to shred the 2A. They have radical DA's in places like Philadelphia busting first degree murder charges down to third degree or even manslaughter. Stealing goods valued under $900 is now only a misdemeanor in CA. So, hell, let AOC run. Rules don't matter.
 
veritas1 said:
When did Democrats ever care about the Constitution or law? They don't care about immigration law. They want to shred the 2A. They have radical DA's in places like Philadelphia busting first degree murder charges down to third degree or even manslaughter. Stealing goods valued under $900 is now only a misdemeanor in CA. So, hell, let AOC run. Rules don't matter.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
AProudLefty;[/QUOTE said:
Of course, you can't refute anything I said. Your reply is just a huge banner spelling out that you have nothing.
Click to expand...
 
veritas1 said:
Of course, you can't refute anything I said. Your reply is just a huge banner spelling out that you have nothing.
Click to expand...

I cannot tell if you're actually serious. Your post is a very good example of Poe's law. If you want a good example of anyone who want to ignore the Constitution, look no further than Trump, a Republican. "Take away guns and worry about due process later", he said.
 
AProudLefty said:
I cannot tell if you're actually serious. Your post is a very good example of Poe's law. If you want a good example of anyone who want to ignore the Constitution, look no further than Trump, a Republican. "Take away guns and worry about due process later", he said.
Click to expand...

I see you have nothing. It's understandable. When your entire party operates on the premise that they can ignore all the laws they dislike, or arbitrarily fail to enforce them, it makes it a bit difficult to come up with a response.
 
veritas1 said:
I see you have nothing. It's understandable. When your entire party operates on the premise that they can ignore all the laws they dislike, or arbitrarily fail to enforce them, it makes it a bit difficult to come up with a response.
Click to expand...

Why do you insist on making me laugh? This isn't a humor forum. And I see that you are ignoring your own party where you have many Republicans breaking laws and are in prison.
 
veritas1 said:
When did Democrats ever care about the Constitution or law? They don't care about immigration law. They want to shred the 2A. They have radical DA's in places like Philadelphia busting first degree murder charges down to third degree or even manslaughter. Stealing goods valued under $900 is now only a misdemeanor in CA. So, hell, let AOC run. Rules don't matter.
Click to expand...
Do you feel better now that you’ve gotten that out?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom