Democrats Touting AOC for President in 2020. Can Anybody IMAGINE This Imbecile Becoming President?

[Mashmont]

I know plenty of people who bar-tend after college. What is the problem? It's a good gig. You get tips and all.

Not for someone who wants to be president.

 

[Mashmont]

Correct. As in, she is right this moment more qualified.

She's not even qualified to serve Trump coffee.

 

[Court Jester]

That woman is dumber than a bag of broken hammers.

 

[BrotherFease]

Not for someone who wants to be president.

Why is bartending a bad job or makes somebody disqualified for the top job? AOC doesn't come from old money. She interned for Ted Kennedy during college and took an extra job to help her mom out of a gigantic hole. Now you're criticizing her for doing that. I am sorry, but you're being irrational and unreasonable here.

Per Wiki:

After college, Ocasio-Cortez moved back to the Bronx and took a job as a bartender and waitress to help her mother—a house cleaner and school-bus driver—fight foreclosure of their home.She later launched Brook Avenue Press, a now-defunct publishing firm for books that portrayed the Bronx in a positive light.Ocasio-Cortez also worked for the nonprofit National Hispanic Institute.

 

[vegas giants]

That woman is dumber than a bag of broken hammers.

She's great. And someday I hope she is president

 

[veritas1]

You ranted, making unsubstantiated, and random, blanket claims.


Nope. Do you need to be prompted to post coherent comments/questions? Never mind, the question has already been answered.


You’re the one who made the assertions. It’s your job to provide the answers.

I find it highly amusing that you would accuse me of being incoherent. Everything I posted was straightforward and perfectly clear. You just didn't want to address any of it. As for the questions I posed, virtually no Democrat, other than perhaps one in a Trump district, will come out in support of ICE or immigration enforcement. Similarly, few, if any, will come out against their party's eagerness to confiscate firearms from law abiding citizens. So, generally, they want to protect criminals and punish the law abiding. I can see why you wouldn't want to try to defend those positions.

 

[AProudLefty]

I find it highly amusing that you would accuse me of being incoherent. Everything I posted was straightforward and perfectly clear. You just didn't want to address any of it. As for the questions I posed, virtually no Democrat, other than perhaps one in a Trump district, will come out in support of ICE or immigration enforcement. Similarly, few, if any, will come out against their party's eagerness to confiscate firearms from law abiding citizens. So, generally, they want to protect criminals and punish the law abiding. I can see why you wouldn't want to try to defend those positions.

You've met every Democrat? Wow.

 

[veritas1]

You really do want to pretend that the words you wrote don't exist, don't you? :lol: I know it's so inconvenient for you, but you really did say this right here in this thread:



Your empty words. Your pathetic diversion. Your choice to write them.

So please, please try not to fire off lame accusations of going off-topic with fact-free posts when you are the one who is actually doing that. That would help to embarrass yourself less.

Go ahead and refute anything I said. You can't. So, you make lame assed, childish attacks on me. Show me where what I said about Krasner is wrong. Show me where anyone other than the Federal government has responsibility for immigration law, per the Constitution. Show me where any prominent Democrat has come out in support of ICE ahead of illegal immigrants. You're basically afraid to engage and think you can cover that up by attacking me. It's weak and pathetic but, of course, expected.

 

[veritas1]

You've met every Democrat? Wow.

I never made that claim. We're talking about elected officials here. Democrats are deathly afraid to show support for ICE because the party has been hijacked by the Squad and similar far left lunatics. The Democratic party from just 20 years ago is long dead.

 

[AProudLefty]

I never made that claim. We're talking about elected officials here. Democrats are deathly afraid to show support for ICE because the party has been hijacked by the Squad and similar far left lunatics. The Democratic party from just 20 years ago is long dead.

Again, another claim with no evidence at all. Is that your thing?

 

[RaleBulgarian]

I find it highly amusing that you would accuse me of being incoherent. Everything I posted was straightforward and perfectly clear. You just didn't want to address any of it. As for the questions I posed, virtually no Democrat, other than perhaps one in a Trump district, will come out in support of ICE or immigration enforcement. Similarly, few, if any, will come out against their party's eagerness to confiscate firearms from law abiding citizens. So, generally, they want to protect criminals and punish the law abiding. I can see why you wouldn't want to try to defend those positions.

Funny is you thinking that your comments were straightforward.

I’ll give you credit though, in the above post you are being straightforward. Generalizing and continuing to make unsubstantiated claims as usual, but straightforward.

 

[veritas1]

Again, another claim with no evidence at all. Is that your thing?

Evidence? Open your eyes and ears. Listen to what they say. That's your evidence.

BTW, you clung to the Russian collusion nonsense for two years with no evidence so please don't talk to me about evidence.

 

[veritas1]

Funny is you thinking that your comments were straightforward.

I’ll give you credit though, in the above post you are being straightforward. Generalizing and continuing to make unsubstantiated claims as usual, but straightforward.

When you can refute anything I said, I'll be more than happy to have a look at it. I don't expect you'll come up with anything. When do you ever?

 

[AProudLefty]

Evidence? Open your eyes and ears. Listen to what they say. That's your evidence.

BTW, you clung to the Russian collusion nonsense for two years with no evidence so please don't talk to me about evidence.

I did? Well Miss Cleo, perhaps it's time for another job.

 

[AProudLefty]

When you can refute anything I said, I'll be more than happy to have a look at it. I don't expect you'll come up with anything. When do you ever?

Okay. What did they mean when they said they want to reform the immigration system?

 

[veritas1]

Okay. What did they mean when they said they want to reform the immigration system?

They don't want to reform it. If they did, they'd close the current loopholes in the law and support the wall. They have no interest in keeping out illegal immigrants. Those are future Dem voters.

 

[AProudLefty]

They don't want to reform it. If they did, they'd close the current loopholes in the law and support the wall. They have no interest in keeping out illegal immigrants. Those are future Dem voters.

Another claim with no evidence. If they have no interest in keeping out illegal immigrants, then like I asked you, why did they build the walls during Obama admin?

 

[veritas1]

Another claim with no evidence. If they have no interest in keeping out illegal immigrants, then like I asked you, why did they build the walls during Obama admin?

Hey, walls are an immorality. Pelosi told us. Or are those only Trump's walls?:roll: Yea, they want to keep out illegal aliens so badly that they are offering free healthcare to any who get here. That should really act as a deterrent.:lamo

 

[AProudLefty]

Hey, walls are an immorality. Pelosi told us. Or are those only Trump's walls?:roll:

Ah a deflection. A sign that you know I am right.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

When you can refute anything I said, I'll be more than happy to have a look at it. I don't expect you'll come up with anything. When do you ever?

When you pose a direct question or assertion that specifically identifies individuals, not an entire party, I’ll be happy to respond.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Ah a deflection. A sign that you know I am right.

Deflection and obfuscation are his main defenses.

 

[veritas1]

When you pose a direct question or assertion that specifically identifies individuals, not an entire party, I’ll be happy to respond.

But the party was the topic I addressed. If you can find any elected Democrats who have come out strongly for ICE, please identify them.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

But the party was the topic I addressed. If you can find any elected Democrats who have come out strongly for ICE, please identify them.

Factually, you wrongly made false blanket assertions about an entire party, inviting others to prove you wrong in an attempt at “baiting”. It was weak, it was childish, and it failed.

If you want to honestly debate about the specific members who call for the abolishment of ICE, as an example, then name them.

 

[veritas1]

Factually, you wrongly made false blanket assertions about an entire party, inviting others to prove you wrong in an attempt at “baiting”. It was weak, it was childish, and it failed.

If you want to honestly debate about the specific members who call for the abolishment of ICE, as an example, then name them.

I didn't say the abolishment, though some also call for that. I said public support. Where are all the Democrats who publicly support our Federal immigration enforcement professionals? Do you have any?

 

[RaleBulgarian]

I didn't say the abolishment, though some also call for that. I said public support. Where are all the Democrats who publicly support our Federal immigration enforcement professionals? Do you have any?

”Do we have any?” is the correct version of your question.

These Democrats want to abolish ICE - CNNPolitics
Pretty small group of those officials we have that want to abolish ICE. Do they scare you?