- Joined
- Nov 8, 2007
- Messages
- 8,706
- Reaction score
- 1,400
- Location
- Ventura California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
The story says even more about the attitudes and desire that Democrats will push their principles aside because regardless of how much Barrack Hussein Obama moves away from his campaign rhetoric, the bottom line is WINNING in November.
So Democrats, do not Judge the messiah for his changes in policy which he will be adjusting all the way through November, moderates his positions and moves back to the right center in order to get elected, it is only to get elected. Once he is in office, not to worry Liberals, he will push his radical agenda for America and bury any notions that he is not one of the most Liberal politician in Washington.
What is apparent is that Barrack Hussein Obama is not the messiah; he is not the catalyst for change; he is nothing more than another Liberal politician who is willing to say or do anything, even if it means telling lies, to get elected in the interest, not of the American people or having principled positions, but political power which is tantamount to the DNC and the most important thing for Liberals, even if it requires they take the positions of Osama Bin Laden or Americas enemies to get it.
CAMPAIGN '08
Democrats take Obama shift in stride
Exerpts:
As Barack Obama moves to broaden his appeal beyond loyal Democrats, a chorus of anger and disappointment has arisen from the left. But those voices are a distinct minority because the party has a more pressing concern: winning in November.
On Wednesday, Obama again bucked his liberal allies, voting in the Senate to give legal immunity to phone companies that took part in warrantless wiretapping after the Sept. 11 attacks. Critics chided Obama for the vote -- which put him crossways with dozens of Democratic colleagues, including Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.
"We're willing to work through this period," said Richard Parker, president of the liberal Americans for Democratic Action, one of the party's most enduring advocacy groups. In the long run, he said, the organization's "serious concerns" about Obama are far outweighed by its disagreements with Republican John McCain.
Gerald Austin, a veteran Democratic strategist, put it more succinctly: "When I hear people complaining . . . I tell them I have one thing to say: 'President John McCain. Three Supreme Court appointments.' That's all I need to say."
But one similarity is a deep hunger among Democrats to take back the White House -- which has made many in the party willing to stomach views they might have once rejected.
Democrats take Obama shift in stride - Los Angeles Times
So Democrats, do not Judge the messiah for his changes in policy which he will be adjusting all the way through November, moderates his positions and moves back to the right center in order to get elected, it is only to get elected. Once he is in office, not to worry Liberals, he will push his radical agenda for America and bury any notions that he is not one of the most Liberal politician in Washington.
What is apparent is that Barrack Hussein Obama is not the messiah; he is not the catalyst for change; he is nothing more than another Liberal politician who is willing to say or do anything, even if it means telling lies, to get elected in the interest, not of the American people or having principled positions, but political power which is tantamount to the DNC and the most important thing for Liberals, even if it requires they take the positions of Osama Bin Laden or Americas enemies to get it.
CAMPAIGN '08
Democrats take Obama shift in stride
Exerpts:
As Barack Obama moves to broaden his appeal beyond loyal Democrats, a chorus of anger and disappointment has arisen from the left. But those voices are a distinct minority because the party has a more pressing concern: winning in November.
On Wednesday, Obama again bucked his liberal allies, voting in the Senate to give legal immunity to phone companies that took part in warrantless wiretapping after the Sept. 11 attacks. Critics chided Obama for the vote -- which put him crossways with dozens of Democratic colleagues, including Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.
"We're willing to work through this period," said Richard Parker, president of the liberal Americans for Democratic Action, one of the party's most enduring advocacy groups. In the long run, he said, the organization's "serious concerns" about Obama are far outweighed by its disagreements with Republican John McCain.
Gerald Austin, a veteran Democratic strategist, put it more succinctly: "When I hear people complaining . . . I tell them I have one thing to say: 'President John McCain. Three Supreme Court appointments.' That's all I need to say."
But one similarity is a deep hunger among Democrats to take back the White House -- which has made many in the party willing to stomach views they might have once rejected.
Democrats take Obama shift in stride - Los Angeles Times
Last edited: