• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Democrats SS “plan”.

Squawker

Professor
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,314
Reaction score
4
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
May 14, 6:05 PM (ET)

By GLEN JOHNSON
WASHINGTON (AP) - Breaking with party leaders, a Democratic congressman plans to introduce Social Security legislation, saying his first commitment is to his constituents.
-snip-
Wexler's bill calls for a 6 percent tax on all income above the current $90,000 cap. Three percent would be paid by workers and 3 percent paid by their employer.
At the same time, the bill would reinstitute "pay-go" rules for federal budgeting, requiring that any tax cuts or increase in entitlement spending be paid for either by raising taxes or cutting spending elsewhere. The requirement expired at the end of 2002.
Wexler's proposal, which he will unveil in Florida on Monday, would not require any cut in scheduled benefits or increase in the retirement age, and it does not provide for private accounts.
Raising taxes, wow that is such an original idea. Why not compromise with a 4% increase and allow people to invest the additional 2% in a retirement fund?
Source
 

Simon W. Moon

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Messages
22,813
Reaction score
8,105
Location
Fayettenam
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Squawker said:
Raising taxes, wow that is such an original idea. Why not compromise with a 4% increase and allow people to invest the additional 2% in a retirement fund?
Source
Investing in our own accounts may be very helpful for those of us who invest, however, the trouble w/ SS is that there's more scheduled to go out than what comes in. What gets invested in other accounts is not very germane to this issue unless the benefits paid out are some how reduced because of/ in relation to the income from private investments.

I can't quote the numbers off hand. Perhaps 4% would be sufficient?

I think that there needs to a radical restructuring of much of the federal fiscal structure. SS'd be just the beginning.
 

Mixed View

Active member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
343
Reaction score
1
Location
MO
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
check out www.boortz.com and look up "the democrat's secret plan" it scared the crap out of me.
 
Top Bottom