• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats introduce bill to take nuclear football out of Trump's hands

American

Trump Grump Whisperer
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
96,461
Reaction score
33,781
Location
Western Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Democrats introduce bill to take nuclear football out of Trump's hands | Fox News


Two Democratic lawmakers introduced legislation Tuesday that would prevent President Trump from launching a nuclear weapon without a obtaining a congressional declaration of war.
Foreign Policy reported that the bill was introduced by Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., and Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif. The article notes that Lieu has a paper sign outside his office that reads, “Alternative Fact Free Zone.”
Under current law, the U.S. president can order a first-use nuclear strike even if the U.S. is not under nuclear attack.
No doubt the lefties will support this, they're a lockstep party; stragglers will be persecuted. Anyhow, we have at least two Dems that are desperate. This is purely political swaggering, since they know it will never pass.
 
Democrats introduce bill to take nuclear football out of Trump's hands | Fox News



No doubt the lefties will support this, they're a lockstep party; stragglers will be persecuted. Anyhow, we have at least two Dems that are desperate. This is purely political swaggering, since they know it will never pass.

This is a bad idea, if there is an incident where we need to launch nukes and congress is all dead or can't be convened then that could leave us defenseless.
 
This is a bad idea, if there is an incident where we need to launch nukes and congress is all dead or can't be convened then that could leave us defenseless.

While this is all political posturing, I'm sure any law like this would have caveats in case of such a disastrous turn of events.
 
This is a bad idea, if there is an incident where we need to launch nukes and congress is all dead or can't be convened then that could leave us defenseless.

Right...we'd be a smoking wasteland before this Congress got around to a declaration.

Did they say who would be in control if not the POTUS? Pelosi?
 
On a separate note, who here can say with absolute sincerity that they're okay with the idea that trump now has the final word in declaring nuclear war?
 
Why do you continue to spout off things that are simply false and/or stupid like this?

You are welcome anytime, anywhere to prove me wrong. You're a huge leftwinger, so please disagree completely with these two clowns. I'm waiting.
 
On a separate note, who here can say with absolute sincerity that they're okay with the idea that trump now has the final word in declaring nuclear war?

I would say nearly all americans are not concerned, otherwise they would be marching against nukes (or fleeing the country) rather than wearing *****hats. It appears to be pretty low on everyones priority list.
 
You are welcome anytime, anywhere to prove me wrong. You're a huge leftwinger, so please disagree completely with these two clowns. I'm waiting.

While this is all political posturing, I'm sure any law like this would have caveats in case of such a disastrous turn of events.

Literally the next post after the one you quoted.
 
On a separate note, who here can say with absolute sincerity that they're okay with the idea that trump now has the final word in declaring nuclear war?

He doesn't. No president does.
 
This is a bad idea, if there is an incident where we need to launch nukes and congress is all dead or can't be convened then that could leave us defenseless.

I don't think a cool down period is a bad idea, and we aren't "defenseless because of it". Potentially killing thousands, if not millions of people, should be last resort and carefully considered. We have other options.
Of course no one person makes the decision even now, and getting congressional approval is a bit steep.
 
Democrat whining carries over into a DOA legislation.... they'd be better served spending their time on issues that actually matter to all American's and not just the alt-left dingbats.
 
Democrats introduce bill to take nuclear football out of Trump's hands | Fox News



No doubt the lefties will support this, they're a lockstep party; stragglers will be persecuted. Anyhow, we have at least two Dems that are desperate. This is purely political swaggering, since they know it will never pass.

So even if we are attacked the demoRATS think we should wait until they come to some decision , who knows months later at the rate they move on issues , before we are allowed to strike . And they wonder why they lost the House , The Senate , and the presidency . :roll:
 
He doesn't. No president does.

Actually the president does have authority however based on the situation people do not have to comply with the order.
like right now. trump could order a nuclear strike however that doesn't mean that people have to comply with it.

they could argue that he is mentally deranged and unfit to serve since giving a command like that in which they would probably be correct.

however in a situation where the US was under attack by another country launching a weapon at us then yes he has full authority to strike back.
 
So even if we are attacked the demoRATS think we should wait until they come to some decision , who knows months later at the rate they move on issues , before we are allowed to strike . And they wonder why they lost the House , The Senate , and the presidency . :roll:

Maybe they think we can ward off an attack with ***** power. Given what we've seen from them in recent days, I'm not sure they deserve any power at all to make decisions. It's like they've gone full retard.
 
Actually the president does have authority however based on the situation people do not have to comply with the order.
like right now. trump could order a nuclear strike however that doesn't mean that people have to comply with it.

they could argue that he is mentally deranged and unfit to serve since giving a command like that in which they would probably be correct.

however in a situation where the US was under attack by another country launching a weapon at us then yes he has full authority to strike back.

Only with the approval of his joint chiefs of staff.
 
I don't remember anyone wanting to restrain the President before. Clearly partisan.

Of course it's partisan! Specifically, partisan against the biggest loose cannon we've had as a president in recent memory. But thanks for moving the goalposts, since you couldn't stick me on "leftwingers being in lockstep."
 
Maybe they think we can ward off an attack with ***** power. Given what we've seen from them in recent days, I'm not sure they deserve any power at all to make decisions. It's like they've gone full retard.

:roll:

Yes, the sitting president of the U.S. is sending his flunky out to whine about inauguration attendance on the first day of his administration, and it's the left that's gone "full retard." Keep sipping that Breitbart Kool-Aid. You can barely taste the cyanide!
 
:roll:

Yes, the sitting president of the U.S. is sending his flunky out to whine about inauguration attendance on the first day of his administration, and it's the left that's gone "full retard." Keep sipping that Breitbart Kool-Aid. You can barely taste the cyanide!

Whatever! Hardly enough to worry yourself over. Clearly the press lied about attendance. I've seen several photos that prove they lied.
 
Back
Top Bottom