• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats' ignorance on guns guns is why they'll never pass another ban, plus the Supreme Court (1 Viewer)

Rich2018 said:
Stephen Paddock was a lawful gunner, until he opened fire from the Mandalay hotel.
Click to expand...

How often that happens out of all the "lawful gun owners" is a great question.
 
Rich2018 said:
How much "knowledge" about guns, would democrats need to show before you'd support their gun control policies.
Click to expand...

Not really sure. At a minimum they'd need to demonstrate the competency they want to require of gun owners though.
 
Rich2018 said:
List of 2024 incidents, in the USA, where 4 or more people were shot (though not necessarily killed), not including the shooter or shooters

List of mass shootings in the United States in 2024 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

How many had previous convictions for gun crime (that's crimes involving the use of at least one firearm - as I know you like to be pedantic).
Click to expand...
Okay now I need 99,997,000 more. Or I would settle for a single percentile of that.
 
Such a bizarre delusion that an person's political view precludes them from owning a gun should preclude the claimant from being allowed a fork in his rubber room.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Okay now I need 99,997,000 more. Or I would settle for a single percentile of that.
Click to expand...

Sorry, your ability to count is in question if you think that the link I cited only lists TWO instances where 4 or more people were shot (though not necessarily killed), not including the shooter or shooters.
 
Rich2018 said:
Sorry, your ability to count is in question if you think that the link I cited only lists TWO instances where 4 or more people were shot (though not necessarily killed), not including the shooter or shooters.
Click to expand...

You should have paid more attention in elementary math.
 
Rich2018 said:
Sorry, your ability to count is in question if you think that the link I cited only lists TWO instances where 4 or more people were shot (though not necessarily killed), not including the shooter or shooters.
Click to expand...
It's still way under 1% you need to get cracking on those numbers. Get back to me when you quit making excuses for not having an argument.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom