• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ousts Joe Crowley in New York stunner, CNN projects

ttwtt78640 said:
OK, yet the US 'at large', and 'most of it', does not in favor more socialism which is 'largely', and 'mostly', why we don't have president Bernie Sanders.
Click to expand...

#1: You're wrong:

Poll: Medicare-for-all, public option, Bernie Sanders plan has support - Business Insider

https://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/01/over-60-of-americans-back-tuition-free-college-survey-says.html

https://www.salon.com/2017/01/14/am...ers-economic-policies-so-howd-we-end-up-here/

Poll: Bernie Sanders country?s most popular active politician | TheHill

Do Americans Agree With Bernie Sanders? (INFOGRAPHIC)

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...s/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html


#2: Bernie Sanders was thwarted by his own initial obscurity (the dude literally started out at ~3% vs Clinton's ~60% or so among Democrats), and a skewed primary meticulously engineered to favour Hillary (while existing in an egregious state of conflict of interest with the DNC having been literally financially bailed out by her), along with, by and large, an unfriendly media. It's telling also that he was significantly more popular among the general population than in the Dem party. A loss is a loss, but don't tell me he isn't president because he himself or his ideas aren't popular among a preponderance of Americans.


eohrnberger said:
Hell, everyone might be inclined to support socialism, up until the bill for it comes due.
Click to expand...

See it's funny because yes, while countries like Greece exist, there are also countries like Germany and Norway that are much more financially solvent than the States in terms of metrics like Debt to GDP.

Hell many of these 'socialist' countries are even considered more economically free by blatantly right wing sources like the Heritage Foundation.
 
Last edited:

I'm going to take a punt and say you are being sarcastic. K?
 
eohrnberger said:
I'm going to take a punt and say you are being sarcastic. K?
Click to expand...

Not at all. Why would you need taxes if everyone worked for the state?


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism
 
How come our socialist military never runs out of other people's money?
 
eohrnberger said:
'Cause money doesn't grow on trees?

TANSTAAFL.

It has proven through history itself as being economically unfeasible?

Take your pick.
Click to expand...
Except in all the places it works great
 

Norway is like Alaska, the entire county is living off of the oil wealth they have, so not a typical situation or a good comparison.

A similar situation this is Venezuela, also sitting on huge oil reserves, socialist, and rapidly failing. I think the next thing is going to happen there will be military totalitarianism / dictatorial state.

The world is still lining up buy US debt, a good thing too since congress can't seem to curb it's spending habit, as the US sovereign debt sucks the least of all other sovereign debt, and is still considered reliable and stable.
 
vegas giants said:
Except in all the places it works great
Click to expand...

LOL. Right. We can see that in Venezuela.

All those who want to move the US to socialism should be required to live 2 years in a country where it exists, see if they really end up liking it.

No thanks. I'm happy to keep the regulated capitalistic system we have here in the US, and to make it better, remove more of the government market distortions, wherever possible and practical.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Yep, this heavily demorat district will very likely remain so. The move to openly oppose capitalism in favor of socialism, however, is very likely to remain a rare event in even solid blue districts.
Click to expand...

Now that I think about it, whether she is a socialist or not she will vote however Pelosi tells her to. She reminds me of an beauty pageant contestant that says "I'm for world peach, want to end hunger and find a cure for cancer."
 
SDET said:
Now that I think about it, whether she is a socialist or not she will vote however Pelosi tells her to. She reminds me of an beauty pageant contestant that says "I'm for world peach, want to end hunger and find a cure for cancer."
Click to expand...

I thought that she was for 'whirled peas', but the herd mentality tends to be quite strong among congressional demorats.
 

Extremes are never good examples. This idea that a system focused on its people will automatically end up like Venezuela is a specious argument given the examples of other industrialized nations that do manage that kind of balance. Capitalism run amok can be equally destructive as we've seen in our own history. I agree that well regulated capitalism is the happy compromise, but the level of regulation is what's often in question where some feel it's better to reap rewards now at the expense of the future. Given the wealth generated in this country, I think there's room to push for more sustainable growth instead of risking our environment and financial well being for quick profits.
 
ElChupacabra said:
Extremes are never good examples.
Click to expand...

Agreed, as stated #35

This idea that a system focused on its people will automatically end up like Venezuela is a specious argument given the examples of other industrialized nations that do manage that kind of balance.
Click to expand...

Just one observation: Socialism <> "a system focused on its people"

I think Socialism is more about growing the power of the state at the expense of freedoms of the people, most often through government forced wealth redistribution.
Other opinions differ.


Quite true.

Given the wealth generated in this country, I think there's room to push for more sustainable growth instead of risking our environment and financial well being for quick profits.
Click to expand...

That's going to be a real challenge when generations of business leaders and Wall Street are all so focused on quarter to quarter earnings. Taking companies private avoid this, but come with different costs in doing this.
 

Ideologies can be modified to fit what works for a specific country. Often people look at the extremes and the idea itself becomes tainted due to that. As an American, I like the idea of us contributing for the basic services which help us thrive and build the middle class we need to remain competitive. The current idea is those who rise in spite of adversity will be the cream of the crop, but the obstacles continue to increase and the wealth concentrated in the hands of a few.



That's going to be a real challenge when generations of business leaders and Wall Street are all so focused on quarter to quarter earnings. Taking companies private avoid this, but come with different costs in doing this.
Click to expand...

Yep, but that's the challenge and it will take our smartest people to figure it out. Fighting amongst ourselves isn't what will help.
 

Contributing for basic services is already taking place in the US managed capitalistic system, as is a degree of wealth redistribution. The US had a thriving middle class up until the political elite went on a globalist binge, which drained the country of well paying middle class jobs. It appears that some of that is turned back, but we'll see how long that lasts and how deep that recovery.

The wealth concentration into the hands of the political elite is not only a pattern we see in the US system, it is also present in the Western Europe social democracies as well, and has been since the end of WW II.

Yep, but that's the challenge and it will take our smartest people to figure it out. Fighting amongst ourselves isn't what will help.
Click to expand...

Quite true.
 

What about France?

Denmark?

Canada?

Austria?

Switzerland?

Australia?

I'll note you didn't actually refute Germany's example either.

The list goes on.

Also Norway is nothing like Venezuela because it properly managed its oil wealth and responsibly diversified it into other ventures and investments; as of the time of this writing its sovereign wealth fund is worth more than 1 trillion and counting. The country, like Germany, is running budget surpluses for ****'s sake, has been with very few exceptions for more than 20 years (with no annual deficits to my knowledge, only quarterly), and this during and despite a significant depression in oil prices over the past couple.



Wealth disparity exists globally, but it is nowhere near as high in most of Western/Northern Europe, not to mention they have better economic mobility with the exception of the UK.
 
Last edited:
SDET said:
Now that I think about it, whether she is a socialist or not she will vote however Pelosi tells her to. She reminds me of an beauty pageant contestant that says "I'm for world peach, want to end hunger and find a cure for cancer."
Click to expand...

I'll believe it when the Dem party holds that exact same sway over Bernie's vote.

I don't see her being any less of a fire brand from what I've seen thus far. If she were nearly so compliant with the party establishment, people like Pelosi, and their media friends, wouldn't be trying to minimize and marginalize her win; establishment Dems wouldn't feel nearly so threatened by her success.
 

Like Norway, finland, holland, Sweden...
 

She will run her mouth and have no control over what votes are scheduled.
 

Venezuela's failure to diversify their economy, as well as personal corruption of officials, is not a condemnation of socialism, rather incompetent choices and unfortunate circumstance.

Next door socialist Bolivia is thriving:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ollapses-socialist-bolivia-thrives-heres-why/


There isn't anything innately wrong with socialism as you seem to think.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
SDET said:
She will run her mouth and have no control over what votes are scheduled.
Click to expand...

Per what evidence?

I'm not saying she's going to call shots right off the bat, but there is no way Cortez is going to blindly tow the party line or defer utterly to Pelosi.
 
It's important to remember Americas entire political grid is shifted to the right and that the policies that Sean Hannity called "scary" are actually moderate positions to the rest of the world.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

My, that's quite a glowing review of Bolivia. Who wrote that? Why, Francisco Toro did.


Meh, not so sure that I'd believe someone from Venezuela with a Venezuelan socialist perspective on the glories of socialism.

Seems Bolivia is coddling up with the Russians and the Chinese, wonder how long it'll be when that bites them in ass.


Without a doubt, it will bite them in the ass.

While a well managed government and economy (which is something that we've never seen here in the states under any administration), the question becomes how long will the good times last?

Hey, if you really are that much of an admirer, by all means, move there. Don't pretend that I'm stopping you.

For me:


Thanks but no.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…