• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dem Leadership needs to be replaced?

Dem Leadership needs to be replaced?

  • Total voters
    32

Dans La Lune

Do you read Sutter Cane?
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 30, 2019
Messages
15,578
Reaction score
10,482
Location
Hobbs End
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Socialist
Dem Leadership needs to be replaced: Yes or No. They're fully controlled by the whims of donors. Thus, the ideology of the donors is the ideology of the leadership. In this state the Dems are barely a political party. Certainly not a resistance party.

It's not just generational. Hakeem Jeffries is not better than Pelosi, and may actually be much worse.

 
Schumer and Jeffries need to go. Neither is fit for this moment.
 
I just love how the far left is helping the far right cause to make sure Dems can never win another election because some Dems aren't left enough.

True story:

On another debate forum a few years back, I was attacked by some of those Bernie Bros types for not being in line with all Leftist thinking (though I consider myself Liberal), and when I tried to back up my arguments, they banned me from their site.

It happened. There are a few on here who would do the same given their druthers. It's just as much because of them than because of the tactics of the Right that the Dems are screwed.

Keep up the good work those of you on the Far Left.
 
As a Conservative, I don’t give a **** what Democrats do, but on a personal level, I have far more respect for Populist Progressive Democrats like AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren than I do for the milquetoast Establishment Corporate Democrats like Jeffries, Schumer, Pelosi, and Harris who are bought and paid for by their donors and tools for foreign governments (especially Israel).

Btw, if you’re a Progressive, you’ll like this video from a month ago:

Mark
 
Things the democratic leadership should do: never listen to socialists or libertarians when they whine and cry about what all is wrong with the party.
 
lynnwinslow said:
Or MAGA. MAGA also likes to offer "helpful" advice to Democrats.
Click to expand...
True, but I do not think many if any are actually listening to what they are saying we should do.

What democrats need to do is get better at explaining what we really want to do, and why it would be a good idea to do it. We got so fixated on explaining why Trump was a terrible person that we failed to explain why Harris would be a good president. I think that is the heart of why we lost in 2024. We do not need to change the party to appease some fringe group, as that will not row the party. We need to explain why are policy plans are good plans. If we can explain properly why the issues people care about will be better handled by the democratic candidate than the republican one, then we have a chance to win elections again.
 
I certainly agree with you that Jeffries isn’t Pelosi. When Trump won in 2016 Pelosi took the reins of leadership in opposition to Trump which eventually lead to a 42-seat gain in the house, the democrats regaining control in 2018. I classify the democratic party as being both leaderless and rudderless this time around.

Pelosi had a lot less to work with than Jeffries, 194 democratic seats vs. Jeffries 215. Yet, Pelosi ran an effective opposition and got the democratic message out to the public. Jeffries and Schumer has done none of that. Neither Jeffries or Schumer have been able to unify the democratic party in opposition as different factions within the democratic party continue to fight for control.

Both major parties are controlled by their donors, that’s not new. But perhaps in the age of social media having mega donors’ money isn’t as important as it was in the past. Remember, Trump won twice while receiving and spending much less money. In 2016 Clinton raised and spent 1.191 billion to Trump’s 636.8 million and Clinton lost. In 2024 Harris raised and spent 1.994 billion to Trump’s 1.453 billion, Harris lost.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-presidential-campaign-fundraising/

https://www.opensecrets.org/2024-presidential-race

Biden won in 2020 while outspending Trump 1,624 billion to 1.088 billion

https://www.opensecrets.org/2020-presidential-race

Cash isn’t the democrats problem, it’s lack of a coherent message attractive to most Americans.
 
Are you ready to suffer the slings and arrows coming from the Far Left?
You are a Liberal but you don't want to buy into all the hype from that faction on the Left.
I hope you stick around and not get banned from this debate site.
But I hope the Far Left does not take you too seriously because then they might change and become more Moderate. They need to keep wandering around in their self-made desert as we approach 2026.
 
You're not wrong but part of the issue - or maybe the whole issue - is the media doesn't want those conversations. Dems need to completely disregard the MSM, that would be a good start to helping inform the public of where they stand, most of which the public agrees with Dems.
 
Perotista said:
Cash isn’t the democrats problem, it’s lack of a coherent message attractive to most Americans.
Click to expand...
While I don't disagree with this at all, I think the problems the Dems are facing are far more than just this, and I think their problems are still currently growing rather than shrinking. I think the Dem party is a disaster right now. Maybe they'll clean it up and turn it around, but I think it's still in downhill slide mode rather than climbing uphill.
 
I agree, good point, and true. I'm Independent and voted for President Biden due to his being more moderate and less far left. I think the Democrats would do better if they didn't stab each other in the back and become more united. Far left isn't as bad as far right, but they can lose elections by sitting home and pouting when their guy doesn't get nominated. I wasn't about to vote for a Beto, whose selling point was going door to door and confiscating semi-auto guns from law abiding citizens.
 
This unfortunately is a tall order for Democrats. Consider their mission is now to effectively represent everyone who isn’t MAGA, which means uniting everyone from the far left Bernie Bros to the right wing Mitt Romney—and everybody in-between. Even in normal times that’s a very difficult thing to do.

But it gets worse because these aren’t normal times. They are up against not a political party but a religious cult built around absolute conformance with and allegiance to one man. Just take this thread and its participants: you and I will disagree on things from time to time but say @gbg3 and @jaypatriot? No disagreement, just absolute conformance with each other, built through absolute allegiance to Donald Trump.

A political party trying to represent 200+ million Americans who can’t stand each other facing off against 30-million-member religious cult operating with one mind, one soul, one set of beliefs?

Yeah, of course the Democrats will appear rudderless by comparison.
 

Jeffries holds back on endorsing Democratic NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries hesitated to endorse Democratic New York City mayor contender Zohran Mamdani but praised his “successful” campaign and messaging.
abcnews.go.com

 
At some point the only way maga is beaten is if the rest of the country stops pretending this is all happening in another country.
 

Yes. The neoliberal capitalist moderates need to go.
 
Here's to "the Democrats will appearing rudderless by comparison."
I don't what "absolute allegiance to Donald Trump" really means.
If Trump causes confusion by waffling on security guarantees for Ukraine or saying Ukraine and Russia can continue fighting while engaging in peace talks, I am going to state that is wrong.
I want Trump to win. That is obvious. But sometimes his idea of common sense is not mine.
 
Anyone who takes AIPAC blood money, does not affirm support for immigrants and immigration as a net positive for society, and does not defend minorities and the LGBTQ community and the homeless and disabled - should be primaried.

If you can't defend against the fascist oppression of minority and marginalized groups, you sure as hell aren't gonna be there for the fight to restore democracy and an economic order that helps everyone, not just the billionaire class.
 
The Brad Dad said:
At some point the only way maga is beaten is if the rest of the country stops pretending this is all happening in another country.
Click to expand...
MAGA will be beaten and the Dems will prevail when Trump leaves the stage and JD Vance DOES NOT BECOME PRESIDENT.
Until then, I hope the Dems keep wandering around in their desert and keeps fumbling around looking for a new leader of their party.
 
Jeffries is much worse that Pelosi, completely useless. At least Pelosi had some fight in her. The analysis of @Perotista in post #12 is spot on.
 
Well said, you're right and I agree. It is a tall order, and these are far from normal times. I wish they would acknowledge the severity of losing in the upcoming elections and what it will do to the country and our people. I'd like to see them unite, fight harder, get louder, make more headlines, be more assertive/aggressive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…