• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Delay gets booked

scottyz

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Moderate


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051020/ap_on_go_co/delay_indictment_31;_ylt=AqCassrorW.i62XTYGS4ck6GbToC;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl






The way to a politicians heart is through his stomach?


http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-10-17-delay-politics_x.htm?csp=N009
 
I would much more enjoy seeing him hanged, in public.:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
 
Old and wise said:
I would much more enjoy seeing him hanged, in public.:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Heh, I tend to agree.

Glad to see justice finally dished out. Its too often dirty politicians like this get away with "murder".
 
How about we wait and see if he's guilty first, I mean, before we go hanging anyone. This is the fifth time he has been brought before a grand jury, I believe I could get him indicted with that many opportunities, lol.
 
Deegan said:
How about we wait and see if he's guilty first, I mean, before we go hanging anyone. This is the fifth time he has been brought before a grand jury, I believe I could get him indicted with that many opportunities, lol.

That's the big problem I have with grand juries. I sometimes wonder if it is best where a person can only brought up before a grand jury one time and one time only, and if you can't get an indictment out of that, then he can never be brought before a grand jury again and, a prosecutor cannot decide to independenty charge him. What's the use of grand juries when you can constantly keep bringing people up multiple times in front of different grand jurors? Grand juries were originally designed to prevent malacious prosecution, but it seems today, they can be used as a tool for malacious prosecution and give it a face of non-malacious prosecution.
 
I mean, you might as well not have a grand jury and just independently charge the person. My view, is that if a prosecutor decided to go with a grand jury to get somebody indicted, he only has one chance and one chance only and he then cannot decide to independently charge the person. Otherwise, I don't see much use in a grand jury.
 


They are always going to suggest "new evidence" "new witnesses" etc, they may even have them, so there really is no getting around it. Still, this guy has a track record of poorly researched cases, paper thin evidence, and constant harassment of politicians he may disagree with, he can be changed, or kicked out of office. Sad thing is, the state set him up in this position of watch dog, so nothing will change, not anytime soon. I think it's a waste of tax payer money to make ethics violations criminal, but that is the way things have turned, enjoy the ride.:roll:
 

I think it's BS that prosecutors can bring somebody up before a grand jury multiple times. Are their any sort of mechanisms in place to prevent abuse on the part of the prosecutor when bringing somebody before multiple grand juries?
 
TimmyBoy said:
I think it's BS that prosecutors can bring somebody up before a grand jury multiple times. Are their any sort of mechanisms in place to prevent abuse on the part of the prosecutor when bringing somebody before multiple grand juries?


Well, Earle was finally told not to bring Hutchison before his (judge in last case) court again, but other then that, only the people can vote him out, and they love his style.
 
One Hell Of A Mugshot. If I Was Indicted

I WOULD NOT BE SMILING. SOMETHING SMELLS FISHY AND IT AS CONSER CRIMINAL ACTIVITY WRITTEN ALL OVER IT..

 
I think his picture( the mug shot )was more of statement then just another pretty picture. Basically he was saying to the prosecuters you know what. LIke the %#$@ :spin: you to the prosecuters. Basically snobbing them.
 
[Moderator mode]

Merged the thread "One Hell Of A Mugshot. If I Was Indicted" into this one...same subject matter...

[/Moderator mode]
 
kmhowe72 said:
I think his picture( the mug shot )was more of statement then just another pretty picture. Basically he was saying to the prosecuters you know what. LIke the %#$@ :spin: you to the prosecuters. Basically snobbing them.

The statement was "I dare you Democrats to try and use this picture in your political attacks against me".
 
FinnMacCool said:
He is so happy he's getting arres4ed. Now I know for sure hes guilty.
:rofl :rofl :rofl
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…