Debunk This If You Can[W:107]

[maquiscat]

Ok, let's pick one at random

* It was you who . . . exempted Muslims from penalties under Obamacare that the rest of us have to pay.

Do you honestly believe this? I certainly know it's not true. Why? Because it would be unconstitutional, to say the least.

"Dhimmitude" and the Muslim Exemption - FactCheck.org

That's before you even go into the fact that even if that exception was in there it was put there by Congress not Obama.

 

[maquiscat]

How many times do I have to post in this thread that its agenda is to give voice to anyone who can dismantle the accusations of a radio talk show host who made those accusations that I posted in the OP? Do you have anything to contribute? Did Obama say and do what the radio talk show host said he did, or not?

Amazing how you haven't even addressed how the source you claimed has been dismantled entirely to begin with.

 

[zyzygy]

How many times do I have to post in this thread that its agenda is to give voice to anyone who can dismantle the accusations of a radio talk show host who made those accusations that I posted in the OP? Do you have anything to contribute? Did Obama say and do what the radio talk show host said he did, or not?

They were made by a radio talk show host and are therefore self-dismantling.

 

[maquiscat]

They were made by a radio talk show host and are therefore self-dismantling.

Now you are making the same mistake Hammer did. They were not made by a radio talk show host. We have already shown that in this thread.

 

[zyzygy]

Now you are making the same mistake Hammer did. They were not made by a radio talk show host. We have already shown that in this thread.

Sorry, my mistake.

 

[zyzygy]

I see no conspiracy, only comments by a radio talk show host. It is apparent that you cannot show those comments to be untrue. Interesting!

Why should anybody here bother to prove them untrue? Is there any proof that they are true? That should be the starting point.

 

[TheHammer]

Why should anybody here bother to prove them untrue? Is there any proof that they are true? That should be the starting point.

And here I thought political forums were to discuss such things. Maybe not here, huh?

The floor is open to deliver any evidence pro or con that the insinuations are true or false. So far only 2 posters have given valid attempts at that, kudos to the 2 of them! They both presented good points.

If you have nothing to offer, OH WELL!

 

[TheHammer]

What accusations? That Obama is a Muslim? Is that the accusation?

If you can't figure it out, that's funny, I don't care who ya are!

 

[TheHammer]

That's before you even go into the fact that even if that exception was in there it was put there by Congress not Obama.

Since when did Obummer give a damn about the Constitution or Congress for that matter?

 

[TheHammer]

Amazing how you haven't even addressed how the source you claimed has been dismantled entirely to begin with.

How so?

 

[TheHammer]

They were made by a radio talk show host and are therefore self-dismantling.

So nothing radio talk show host say is true?

 

[TheHammer]

Now you are making the same mistake Hammer did. They were not made by a radio talk show host. We have already shown that in this thread.

Enlighten me, I must have missed it.

 

[Quag]

If you can't figure it out, that's funny, I don't care who ya are!

I am trying to confirm why are you so afraid to state clearly what you think those quotes add up to?

 

[zyzygy]

So nothing radio talk show host say is true?

What do you think? Share it with us. Pick a point and discuss it. Some points have been put to you but you ignored them.

 

[maquiscat]

Since when did Obummer give a damn about the Constitution or Congress for that matter?

It doesn't matter whether or not he gives a damn. The ACA is a law that came from a bill out of Congress, not from an Executive Order. Thus Obama put nothing in the bill. Whether any suggestions he made were added in by a Congressman or not is a separate issue and requires a separate accusation. As it stands, that particular point, not to mention the source of the entire piece, has been debunked.

 

[maquiscat]

How so?

Enlighten me, I must have missed it.

Post #33.

 

[zyzygy]

And here I thought political forums were to discuss such things. Maybe not here, huh?

The floor is open to deliver any evidence pro or con that the insinuations are true or false. So far only 2 posters have given valid attempts at that, kudos to the 2 of them! They both presented good points.

If you have nothing to offer, OH WELL!

If you have nothing to offer, oh well.

 

[Μολὼν λαβέ]

Interesting how the ardent Obama supporters have felt compelled to provide context for him the past eight years.

Maybe you can interpret this statement for us as well.

Obama: "If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun."

 

[zyzygy]

Interesting how the ardent Obama supporters have felt compelled to provide context for him the past eight years.

Maybe you can interpret this statement for us as well.

Who are "they"?

 

[TheHammer]

Post #33.

Very good! If we can or want to believe the "fact checkers," Mike Gallagher didn't author the insinuation article I posted in the OP as the original poster of the article claims. OK. So regardless of that insinuation, how much if any of the verbal indictments listed can you/we discount as inaccurate, flawed, just plain lies, or truths?

 

[Quag]

Very good! If we can or want to believe the "fact checkers," Mike Gallagher didn't author the insinuation article I posted in the OP as the original poster of the article claims. OK. So regardless of that insinuation, how much if any of the verbal indictments listed can you/we discount as inaccurate, flawed, just plain lies, or truths?

What indictment?
You have to say what you think those quotes mean to try and have an indictment.
Lets say every single one of those quotes is true, why would anyone give a rats ass?

 

[TheHammer]

What indictment?
You have to say what you think those quotes mean to try and have an indictment.
Lets say every single one of those quotes is true, why would anyone give a rats ass?

Maybe you know why? Maybe not!

This is a political forum, right? are the quotes political?

Are you being forced to reply to this thread?

We should give a rat's ass if you give a rat's ass because, why?

 

[zyzygy]

Very good! If we can or want to believe the "fact checkers," Mike Gallagher didn't author the insinuation article I posted in the OP as the original poster of the article claims. OK. So regardless of that insinuation, how much if any of the verbal indictments listed can you/we discount as inaccurate, flawed, just plain lies, or truths?

Let's start with you. Which ones would you discount?

 

[Quag]

Maybe you know why? Maybe not!

This is a political forum, right? are the quotes political?

Are you being forced to reply to this thread?

We should give a rat's ass if you give a rat's ass because, why?

So there is no point to your thread.

 

[TheHammer]

Let's start with you. Which ones would you discount?

Actually, this thread starts with everyone but me because I made the OP. The challenge is to debunk the accusations.

However having said that, I'll ignore the fact that your request is simply a cop out avoiding the fact that you have nothing to contribute to this thread and say, so far that posters to this thread have shown that Mike Gallagher wasn't the original author of the accusations, and Obama is either not a muslim, or he's a bacon eating muslim, or somebody was a very good photo shop artist.