- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,478
- Reaction score
- 17,282
- Location
- Southwestern U.S.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
OK... Is there anyone out there that still doesn't understand why not allowing those so called audio "experts" to testify was the right call?
When this guy first took the stand for the state, I thought to myself "This could be the witness that drops a bomb on the defense", but the more testimony he gives, the more he appears to be just as ineffective at bolstering the state's case as nearly every other witness has been.
Explain that - I'm behind.
When this guy first took the stand for the state, I thought to myself "This could be the witness that drops a bomb on the defense", but the more testimony he gives, the more he appears to be just as ineffective at bolstering the state's case as nearly every other witness has been.
He's clearing up the confusion and controversy... which is valuable.. and appropriate.
Explain that - I'm behind.
Explain that - I'm behind.
So the jury won't be hearing anyone say "I know that's Trayvon's voice yelling for help"?
No experts. Just family/friends.
So the jury won't be hearing anyone say "I know that's Trayvon's voice yelling for help"?
That is correct little missy
(my fake Texas accent)
It sure seems like this expert may have just turned on the prosecution.
It sure seems like this expert may have just turned on the prosecution.
Turned on?
I am curious, don't you think that the prosecution pretty much knew what he would testify to?
They probably just put him out there first to minimize any damage later.
Is there anything in his testimony that was not expected?
A quickie..
The state lined up 3 experts that claimed to be able to recognize the voice (and hear things no one else heard). The defense lined up experts (includig this guy) to show that it is impossible to recognize voice on this recording.
The judge weiged the evidence and decided that the voice experts would not be allwoed to testify on who was screaming for help.
This guy is a witness for the defense.. Do you understand the point of the testimony?
This guy is a witness for the defense.. Do you understand the point of the testimony?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?