- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,478
- Reaction score
- 17,282
- Location
- Southwestern U.S.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Once again you failed to link to source material.This thread is for discussing the days testimony in court, which will begin Thursday morning at 9am EST/6am PST.
Once again, please try to keep your comments related to the trial testimony and avoid straying off into debating other aspects not covered in the proceedings...
Thx.
She can't read cursive writing and she will be a senior in high school?
He's just badgering her now, trying to twist everything to confuse her.
He's trying to get her story straight.
Oh stop. You know he's not trying to get anything straight. He's trying to get her to say something that supports his client.
That would be his job,
What people may not realize is this witness compared to the others thus far, is a friend of Martin and has motivation to lie. Therefore her testimony has to be examined very extensively.
He's gone on an extensive inquire into matters that have nothing to do with her testimony regarding what she hear. Her story regarding what she heard has not changed. If anything, she gave the defense more information into Martin's state of mind in a negative way. The rest of these questions are pointless.
He's fishing for errors to make her look bad.
Her testimony changed from one deposition to another. "Why are you following me?" First testimony under oath: "What are you talking about?" Second testimony under oath: "What are you doing here?" That is a salient point.
She was asked during a recorded interview if she thought GZ's actions were racially motivated, she said she thought it was. That portion of the interview is missing from the transcript. That is a salient point,
When asked WHY she thought it was racially motivated, she replied, paraphrased, "Because GZ was white." Another salient point.
When the state is trying to say GZ had a depraved mind . . . a total disregard for human life . . . her testimony is crucial. She is slowly being found incredible, in my opinion.
If she lied about all these items to help the mother and not hurt her feelings what else did she lie about? That's really the point of the questioning. Help the jury make the decision that they can't believe a thing she says.
If she lied about all these items to help the mother and not hurt her feelings what else did she lie about? That's really the point of the questioning. Help the jury make the decision that they can't believe a thing she says and theyjust ignor (or put little weight) to all of her testimony.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?