You did not watch the video. So easy to tell.
I did. Evolution has no mathematical problem. You obviously don't understand what science is about as I will show.
Gravity is based on proof. ... The course of a object in space can be predicted by Newtons Theories
A confirmed prediction isn't proof, it is only evidence for a theory. A theory is a hypothesis with many confirmed predictions and is highly likely to be true. Also, the t
Darwins has major flaws. ... yet for evolution, there is no predictability I know of. If you know of a predictability, enlighten me.
The theory of gravity was wrong about Mercury's orbit. This was something that the theory of relativity explained. While the theory of gravity isn't perfect, it works for most situations.
The theory of evolution makes many predictions about the fossil record, our DNA, and morphology that have been confimed. We have for example found numerous transitional fossils between humans and apes. We have also found that we share retrovirus DNA with apes.
What I recall that I hope is accurate is that Darwin said things as if he made them up. Some of his claims make sense but not all of them. This is due they think to him not having the advantage of modern tools like DNA, Electron Microscopes and a lot more. Time passed him by.
Darwin had no understanding of DNA. Actually for a theory, it is pretty sketchy. Were it solid, it would be hailed as the explanaton that works.
Darwin's original theory was a good start and while not perfect gave us the general idea of common descent and natural selection. We have improved on his ideas and the theory of evolution today is far more accurate than the theory in 1860. He knew that animals were changing from generation to generation, but he didn't know about genetics and mutations. But he came to the right conclusion of common descent with much less knowledge than we have today which is incredible and shows his genius.
I have said many times myself that evolution only means change. Evolution does not explain much if anything to us. A baby proves change if you study children. As the child grows, it is not normally a twin of either parent.
No, evolution is a very specific type of change from mutations from generation to generation. With enough generations, the number of mutation differences will be vast.
These men spoke quite a bit about the Cambrian explosion. Most people are virtually in the dark about the period and ramifications.
I want to offer links but fear I will be asked to read them to particular posters. But here is one. Cambrian explosion - Wikipedia
We still haven't uncovered most of the fossil record and transitionals for the cambrian explosion could be out there in some cave deep down in the earth. 99.99% of the fossil record remains undiscovered. Also, if the ancestors of these creatures were soft-bodied, it would be very difficult for them to fossilize. So the cambrian explosion may not have been an explosion and may have been much slower, we just don't have the transitional fossils yet. And even if it was an explosion, it happened over millions of years, and humans evolved over 6 million years, so millions of years is enough time. An imperfect fossil record doesn't refute evolution.
