• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Daily KOS Put Bullseye on Rep. Giffords.

ReverendHellh0und said:
Then why are we even talking about the stupid graphic. look at the link, those are surveyor marks. you called me dishonest. i proved you once again, wrong.
Click to expand...

they are also crosshairs, and we both know what they were intended to be, don't we? THAT'S where you are blatantly dishonest, for ever even suggesting they were meant to be something else.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
It's called having class and taste, the poor lady was shot, any imagry that MIGHT look like a target, or what not, if she kept it up, there would be 50 threads by the kooks on this site about how insensitive she is... Oh who am I fooling, there already is 50 threads on palin because some crazy a-political d00d shot a pro-gun congress woman in the head...


the dishonesty of all this is a new low for some people here.
Click to expand...

It doesn't take more than 2 brain cells to figure out that they are crosshairs, Rev. There were complains about her poster WAY before the shooting, so she knew that the talk has been out there. Once the shooting happened, the site was scrubbed fast. She used poor judgement.... can you admit at least that?
 
Middleground said:
It doesn't take more than 2 brain cells to figure out that they are crosshairs, Rev. There were complains about her poster WAY before the shooting, so she knew that the talk has been out there. Once the shooting happened, the site was scrubbed fast. She used poor judgement.... can you admit at least that?
Click to expand...


Link please.....



I see nothing wrong with using crosshairs, or that poster, or her rhetoric. the left has used it as well. its metaphor. common.

that said, it was in good taste and respect that she would take it down after this shooting.

it's in poor taste for folks to start 30 threads on her trying to link her to a nutbag.
 
liblady said:
they are also crosshairs, and we both know what they were intended to be, don't we? THAT'S where you are blatantly dishonest, for ever even suggesting they were meant to be something else.
Click to expand...



they are also crosshairs? which scope model uses such a setup, and how do you guage distance on such a sighting system?


thanks.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
they are also crosshairs? which scope model uses such a setup, and how do you guage distance on such a sighting system?


thanks.
Click to expand...


Rev, a surveys tool is like a scope, like a GUN SIGHT! Why it's just obvious Sarah Palin was trying to secretly incite death squads to kill her political enemies. SHEESH, I mean every good, important and intelligent person says so now!




;)
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Link please.....



I see nothing wrong with using crosshairs, or that poster, or her rhetoric. the left has used it as well. its metaphor. common.

that said, it was in good taste and respect that she would take it down after this shooting.

it's in poor taste for folks to start 30 threads on her trying to link her to a nutbag.
Click to expand...




Listen to what rightie Elizabeth Hassleback has to say here back in March:
 
Last edited:
ReverendHellh0und said:
they are also crosshairs? which scope model uses such a setup, and how do you guage distance on such a sighting system?


thanks.
Click to expand...

EVERY precision instrument manual is a CLUE!!!! /sacrasm
 
Middleground said:
It doesn't take more than 2 brain cells to figure out that they are crosshairs, Rev. There were complains about her poster WAY before the shooting, so she knew that the talk has been out there. Once the shooting happened, the site was scrubbed fast. She used poor judgement.... can you admit at least that?
Click to expand...

Rahm Emanuel has now issued a statement about how his "you never let a good crises go to waste" statement wasn't meant for 'situations like this'.

do you think that he used poor judgement in that original statement, or was inciting violence?
 
TheGirlNextDoor said:
It's the same thing. :doh

Good gawd.. the partisan hackery knows no bounds.
Click to expand...

You are comparing apples to cinderblocks. Its not the same thing at all.

Robert DeNiro
THE DEERHUNTER
"This is this. This isn't something else. This is this."
 
Barbbtx said:
Where are Palins crosshairs?:lamo:lamo

The Difference Between Surveyor Symbols and Crosshairs - Big
Journalism
Click to expand...

What does this tweet mean, please interpret?

6a00d8341c630a53ef0148c7852672970c-600wi
 
Barbbtx said:
She's been hanging out with the liberal elite for too long.
Click to expand...

in a shocking turn of events; Democrats agree that criticism of Democrats is beyond the pale, and possibly should be criminalized....
 
pbrauer said:
What does this tweet mean, please interpret?

6a00d8341c630a53ef0148c7852672970c-600wi
Click to expand...

It means get energized, get some coffee, the elections aren't over yet. There's work to do!

Oh, or I guess it could mean, "now that your gun is empty from killing people, reload and kill some more." Yea, that must be it.:roll:
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
What is your point? /facepalm
Click to expand...

Me: There were complains about her poster WAY before the shooting

You: Link please.....

Me: (embedded video proof)

You: facepalm

Me: ???
I supplied a video of Giffords herself complaining about it. What else do you want?
 
American said:
An al Qaida Christmas Card??? Well first of all her point is dull and stupid. Second, al Qaida doesn't celebrate Christmas. Hasselback is a ****ing moron.
Click to expand...

What about Giffords point of view? Going to poo-poo that too?
 
Middleground said:
Me: There were complains about her poster WAY before the shooting

You: Link please.....

Me: (embedded video proof)

You: facepalm

Me: ???
I supplied a video of Giffords herself complaining about it. What else do you want?
Click to expand...



Consistancy? a little less bias perhaps? let's start there.
 
Barbbtx said:
It means get energized, get some coffee, the elections aren't over yet. There's work to do!

Oh, or I guess it could mean, "now that your gun is empty from killing people, reload and kill some more." Yea, that must be it.:roll:
Click to expand...

Apparently, only if you have an R after your name. If you have a D, then the first one is the only possible way to interpret her post. Or so those with a D after their name tell me. ;)
 
Middleground said:
Wow, I'm finding it amazing that some of you have no issue with comparing Sarah Palin to Daily Kos. Heck, I'm not complaining one iota, though, as I think both can reach the depths of scum sucking.

What I find really interesting is why Sarah scrubbed her website hours after the shooting. She doesn't strike me as the type to do such a thing. I would have expected her to --*ahem* 'scuse the play on words--stick to her guns. Did she feel somewhat guilty for her irresponsible choices or was she afraid of the possible ensuing attack?
Click to expand...

Since Palin was being partially blamed for the Gifford shooting about a millisecond after it happened she probably didn't want people to continue to use it as a reason to attack her. How respectful would it have been to leave it up there regardless of whether she was being attacked? Palin didn't have to be guilty about what she put on the website but it is hard to not have doubts at the moment you are being critcized about such a horrific event. And attacked unfairly I might add.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom