- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So far, we have one link that says it, "might" help and another from the CDC. IOW, no one can prove that sex-ed reduces teen preggers.
I hope that's not the best you can do.
The CDC link proves it. And you've shown us NOTHING. Time to put up or shut up, apdst.
I don't have to prove anything. You're doing it for me.
Sex-ed has been soooooooo effective, that the teen pregger rate rose 3% and PBO cut $150 million from the sex-ed budget. Even that dumb ass knows it doesn't work.
Sure you do. But, as usual, you make an assertion, and then refuse to substantiate it. Probably because, as usual, you've got NOTHING.
Right. It rose because of the idiotic abstinence only sex ed. which has been proven to be ineffective.
Do you have anything, apdst, or are you going to continue to make claims that you can't substantiate?
Good try, but you're done. Here's a knife and fork.
Good try, but you're done. Here's a knife and fork.
How is he the one that is done? You are the one that are making claims and aren't backing them up. He is the one that backed up his claims.
And as usual, apdst produces NOTHING. And as usual, he loses the debate.
What does that make you, apdst, 0 for 9 million?
If you can't back up a claim, which you obviously can't try not to make the claim. Makes you look foolish.
You've been skewered. Congratulations.
How is he the one that is done? You are the one that are making claims and aren't backing them up. He is the one that backed up his claims.
You just admitted that sex-ed doesn't work. OMG!!!
You can't teach kids how to ****, then expect them not to.
I never did that. I identified that sex ed DOES work with my link, and I identified that Bush's abstinence only sex ed didn't work, hence the increase in teen pregnancy. Comprehensive sex ed DOES work. If you think it does not, show us a study that demonstrates this... something I have been asking for and that you have REFUSED to provide.
Right. It rose because of the idiotic abstinence only sex ed. which has been proven to be ineffective.
You said right here that sex-ed doesn't work:
You said right here that sex-ed doesn't work:
He said abstinence only sex ed doesn't work. Comprehensive sex ed does ,however, show much better results than abstinence only or no sex ed.
Show us something more than comprehensive sex-ed, "might", work. Thanks in advance.
Still NOTHING, eh, apdst? Refute my link with your own.
Echoing the findings of several earlier individual studies and "meta-analyses," the report concludes that sexuality education programs can be successful in preventing teen pregnancy and, moreover, that encouraging abstinence and teaching about contraception are not incompatible. Specifically, it finds that comprehensive sexuality education programs that urge teens to postpone having intercourse but also discuss contraception do not accelerate the onset of sex, increase the frequency of sex or increase the number of partners, as critics of sex education allege, but they do increase the use of contraception when teens become sexually active.
Attempting to elevate the discussion....
Do certain comprehensive sex-ed programs meet with greater success than others? I guess I'm asking what is core content and what is extra.
Attempting to elevate the discussion....
Do certain comprehensive sex-ed programs meet with greater success than others? I guess I'm asking what is core content and what is extra. Are there certain materials where, when left out, hinder the success of a program and is there content which has no effect on the program's success whether they are included or not?
Show us something more than comprehensive sex-ed, "might", work. Thanks in advance.
Sigh. Fine I will find another source. Oh look:
If you are wondering it comes from: Report Says Sex Ed Can Reduce Pregnancy, Jury Out on Ab-Only
So now it is my two sources to your zero. Care to step and show show us something?
"Might work" is still 100% better than what you've produced which is approximately "zero".
He's shown it "might work" and CC has provided a study basically saying it does. You've provided nothing.
So far "Might" is better than "nothing".
"can", and, "might". Where's the source that proves that it does?
Massive fail!!
"can", and, "might". Where's the source that proves that it does?
Massive fail!!
You want to teach kids how to ****, then insist that teen pregger rates will go down. You can't be serious.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?