- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Messages
- 10,185
- Reaction score
- 8,886
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Rep. Jim Jordan, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, thinks that he has something on DA Bragg for having DJT convicted of fraud. Apparently, DA Bragg may very well agree to appear before Congress to testify. The good news is that DA Bragg will not appear before this current MAGA House until after DJT is sentenced. The bad news is - this would be Jim Jordan's personal version of Monty Python's Flying Circus. If there is a scandal to be exposed - it should be Jim Jordan's waste of good oxygen.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg agreed on Friday to testify before Congress as Republicans attempt to discredit former President Donald Trump’s conviction, but indicated that could happen only after Trump is sentenced next month.
The letter from Bragg’s general counsel said the Manhattan DA’s office is willing to engage with the committee to decide a date for the testimony as well as to “better understand the scope and the purpose of the proposed hearing.”
“This Office is committed to voluntary cooperation. That cooperation includes making the District Attorney available to provide testimony on behalf of the Office at an agreed-upon date, and evaluating the propriety of allowing an Assistant District Attorney to testify publicly about an active prosecution to which he is assigned,” the letter reads.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg agreed on Friday to testify before Congress as Republicans attempt to discredit former President Donald Trump’s conviction, but indicated that could happen only after Trump is sentenced next month.
The letter from Bragg’s general counsel said the Manhattan DA’s office is willing to engage with the committee to decide a date for the testimony as well as to “better understand the scope and the purpose of the proposed hearing.”
“This Office is committed to voluntary cooperation. That cooperation includes making the District Attorney available to provide testimony on behalf of the Office at an agreed-upon date, and evaluating the propriety of allowing an Assistant District Attorney to testify publicly about an active prosecution to which he is assigned,” the letter reads.