• Please keep all posts on the Rittenhouse verdict here: Rittenhouse Verdict. Note the moderator warnings in the thread. The thread will be heavily moderated with a zero tolerance policy for any baiting, flaming, trolling or other rule breaks. Stick to the topic and not the other posters. Thank you.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Critique of Egmont Kakarot-Handtke

Onion Eater

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
753
Reaction score
139
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
The following quotation appears in almost every paper that Egmont Kakarot-Handtke has written, and is never justified!

Kakarot-Handtke said:
The period length is conveniently assumed to be the calendar year.

And we all know that, when Kakarot-Handtke uses the word ASSUME, he is making an ass of you and me. Right?

Obviously, Egmont Kakarot-Handtke has not read this paper from 2010:

Aguilar Convergence Problem

If Kakarot-Handtke would have just read the available literature, he wouldn’t make such presumptuous claims about having overthrown everything that went before him.
 
Top Bottom