I'm watching the TMJ4 feed via Rekieta Law on YouTube and it's hilarious...in a brutal, painful, soul destroying kind of way.I didn't see that part, they just went off the record with him still talking. They're moving him to the other courtroom.
Don't know much about this case but your description sounds like a justifiable shooting. You fight with police and use their weapon against them, it's not going to end well.No idea what's going on in the Garrett Rolfe trial. Rolfe is the police officer charged with murder in the death of Rayshard Brooks in Atlanta last summer. Brooks was being arrested for DUI, then got squirrely, assaulted the officers, stole a taser, used it, and was shot while trying to evade capture and disable Rolfe with the stolen taser.
Lots of maneuvering in the DA's office on this one, with prosecutors being added and dropped, and others trying to recuse themselves and their recusal requests being denied. No real news on trial dates, and nothing at all this year in a Google news search. It's interesting this one is flying under the radar with all the commotion it caused in Atlanta.
![]()
Third DA assigned to prosecute officers in Rayshard Brooks case speaks | 11Alive exclusive
Pete Skandalakis was appointed to prosecute officers Garrett Rolfe and Devin Brosnan in the death of Rayshard Brooks.www.11alive.com
All charges against the officers in that case were dropped in late August.Don't know much about this case but your description sounds like a justifiable shooting. You fight with police and use their weapon against them, it's not going to end well.
That would be common sense but this incident happened at the peak of the George Floyd protests, a period where common sense regarding prosecutorial decisions involving police was NOT a consideration.Don't know much about this case but your description sounds like a justifiable shooting. You fight with police and use their weapon against them, it's not going to end well.
I object!Judge Dorow is a menace to trees.
He'll get through the trial, even if he has to give closing statements from another courtroom with a spit mask on.I object!
Brooks is a menace to logic, decorum and anything resembling common sense.
Dorow really needs to go for summary judgement and pass this case on to the court of Twitter where Brooks is most likely to make sense to someone.
Seems like kind of a waste, though I completely understand why this is all being allowed.He'll get through the trial, even if he has to give closing statements from another courtroom with a spit mask on.
I saw your mention that the feed was up, went to the TMJ4 feed and it was already down. Dorow threatened a shock collar? Just...He's removed again. 12 interruptions. She threatened the shock collar. He doesn't consent to any of this and wants to challenge subject matter jurisdiction.
He was pretty good to watch on Rittenhouse and Edgecomb, but after that he brought politics in too much(regardless of what they are.). I'm on his side with the whole copyright thing against L&C, but I just want to listen to the trial. Plus, didn't they unban him? Thought I watched a video from him the other day. Maybe he just still isn't allowed to stream, or he was on someone else's. In any case, if it's because of the copyright, that's stupid, and if it's because YouTube doesn't like his opinion, it's stupid.I saw your mention that the feed was up, went to the TMJ4 feed and it was already down. Dorow threatened a shock collar? Just...
See, stuff like this is why YouTube needs to reverse Nick Rekieta's ban.
Nick got his third strike yesterday.He was pretty good to watch on Rittenhouse and Edgecomb, but after that he brought politics in too much(regardless of what they are.). I'm on his side with the whole copyright thing against L&C, but I just want to listen to the trial. Plus, didn't they unban him? Thought I watched a video from him the other day. Maybe he just still isn't allowed to stream, or he was on someone else's. In any case, if it's because of the copyright, that's stupid, and if it's because YouTube doesn't like his opinion, it's stupid.
There's already been 3 and he was found competent. He has an understanding he's just using antics.Is state going to request a competency (ability to represent kind of competency, not mental capacity) review?