• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Criminal trials to watch and discuss - 2022 edition

Redirect of that doctor done, Heard calls Catherine Arnold, an entertainment industry expert witness.
 
Redirect of that doctor done, Heard calls Catherine Arnold, an entertainment industry expert witness.
Interesting that she's going to testify about damages for BOTH Depp and Heard.
 
That cross before lunch was a bloodbath. That doctor looked absolutely terrible.
After that cross, the doctor could have sued Depp's lawyer for IPV.
 
Interesting that she's going to testify about damages for BOTH Depp and Heard
Just listened to a bit of it, and it was all anti-Depp.
Supposedly there was no Pirates 6 in the works. There certainly was no contract in place.
If thats true then Depp cant claim loss of potential income.
Unless of course what she's saying isnt true
 
Just listened to a bit of it, and it was all anti-Depp.
Supposedly there was no Pirates 6 in the works. There certainly was no contract in place.
If thats true then Depp cant claim loss of potential income.
Unless of course what she's saying isnt true
She is being questioned by Heard's side now. That will likely change when Depp's side gets their chance.
 
Is there any reason why Court TV isnt available on regular cable?? Cause they have excellent shows.
You learn a lot about court protocol and human behaviour
 
I get that. But if Depp's lawyer cant disprove that there was no contract for Pirates 6 he's screwed
His expert already testified he had a deal with Disney, this is the defense damages expert attempting and failing to contradict it.
 
LOL Sorry this alleged entertainment industry consultant is full of it and extremely biased. How can she say she compared Jason Momoa and other hero movie characters to Amber is such BS. Jason Momoa's fame is from the Game of Thrones and the excellent reviews were because of him. He was the box office draw; not Heard. Also what about actresses who have gotten oscars, emmys and are much better actors than Heard and yet it takes a while for them to get parts especially for females. Halle Berry has even talked about this in interviews and she played Cat Woman and Storm. Female roles are just hard to come by. If you look up reviews Momoa is the one mentioned with rave reviews and Justice Quest

Lots of hearsay allowed as well

And I am really surprised the judge let this psychiatrist testify with his arm chair analyses. He never even sat down with Depp.

Zendaya was a Disney star -- and is still very, very young. No comparison to the publicity Zendaya has received and won't even mention Meryl Streep, Angelina Jolie, Viola Davis, Sandra Bullock, Scarlett Johansen, Nicole Kidman, who basically gets paid $35-40 million per movie and Amber Heard is not on that scale and yet this expert says she would have been receiving $40 million. Gal Gadot only got 31 million for Wonder Woman ....... what?

I wasn't even going to comment because I think neither of them should win one red penny but these alleged experts are a joke

I don't even know why I am watching this :unsure:

This is from 2020 -- there is an updated list for 2022 but wanted to post this one because it is closer in time


Sorry for my rant ............
 
Last edited:
Denison is a fine cross examiner, but he needs to get to his point a wee bit faster. Sometimes, as in the particular cross of the entertainment industry expert, a lot faster.
 
Last edited:
How does AH's team keep calling such horrible expert witnesses? The judge had to admonish the doctor at least twice that I heard that he needed to answer the questions.
 
Denison's cross of the entertainment industry expert is as bad as his cross of the doctor was good.

He's literally emptying the gallery right now.
 
Denison ended 180 hours of cross examination of the entertainment industry expert without making a single point any layman could have come away with.

Like, wtf was that?
 
Denison ended 180 hours of cross examination of the entertainment industry expert without making a single point any layman could have come away with.

Like, wtf was that?
I think he did OK on her cross. He made it sound silly how Depp couldn't have damages for pirates 6, when Pirates 6 doesn't exist, yet every alleged damage of Heard's (removal from a potential role) also doesn't exist.
 
I think he did OK on her cross. He made it sound silly how Depp couldn't have damages for pirates 6, when Pirates 6 doesn't exist, yet every alleged damage of Heard's (removal from a potential role) also doesn't exist.
If that was his point (and I'm not arguing that it wasn't) then he needed to make that point in a manner that normal listeners could have followed. His cross was muddled, confusing and meandering.
 
I thought it was interesting how the entertainment expert said that JD's lawsuits were part of why his career and reputation were going downhill. It seems like this one is doing the opposite for him so far....
 
I wish Camille or Chew would've done the cross on Dr. Spiegel. Dennison was just meh. He should've taken his testimony and flipped it on AH.
 
Back
Top Bottom