- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 34,817
- Reaction score
- 18,576
- Location
- Look to your right... I'm that guy.
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
A local high-profile murder case is wrapping up, and the attorneys on both sides gave closing arguments yesterday. The defense pointed out in their closing argument that it was a "crime of passion". I don't think they were suggesting the defendant should be acquitted because of that*, but I think were probably seeking a lesser sentence.
In general, what is your opinion of "crime of passion" as a legal defense and/or its use in a courtroom and trial?
Me: It means absolutely nothing to me. Zero. If I were on a jury, I would dismiss it the moment they said it. It would not be a factor one way or another in my decision. I am aware that there is a long and established history of it being used as a defense, but I simply don't buy into that reasoning. At that level I believe you are responsible for your actions. Grow up, be an adult, and control yourself.
*- The defendant and defense never denied killing the other person, but they have maintained "diminished capacity" and "crime of passion" throughout the case.
In general, what is your opinion of "crime of passion" as a legal defense and/or its use in a courtroom and trial?
Me: It means absolutely nothing to me. Zero. If I were on a jury, I would dismiss it the moment they said it. It would not be a factor one way or another in my decision. I am aware that there is a long and established history of it being used as a defense, but I simply don't buy into that reasoning. At that level I believe you are responsible for your actions. Grow up, be an adult, and control yourself.
*- The defendant and defense never denied killing the other person, but they have maintained "diminished capacity" and "crime of passion" throughout the case.