Neal N. Bloeme
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,964
- Reaction score
- 207
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
private property rights?
some will be relinquished when executing acceptance of the condo association bylaws
"The declaration expressly prohibits unit owners from hanging or displaying anything on the outside windows or outside walls of any building, and also prohibits any sign from being affixed to or placed upon the exterior walls … without prior consent of the association's board of directors,"
did she follow protocol and seek the consent of the board to permanently affix her mezuzah
i am guessing 'no', otherwise she would have cited the disparate religious treatment when recognizing "According to an agreement with its condo owners, the display of items like Christmas wreaths and crosses on doors is allowed ...".
somebody wants to be a victim; they are special
Here we go again. Take it all the way to the USSC. This crap has to be stood up against in the USA. Sick.
Connecticut Condo Owner Told To Remove Jewish Religious Ornament Or Face Fines | Fox News
private property rights?
Really?! A mezuzah is small, almost unnoticeable at all.
Yet not zero, yes?
We're talking maybe 3" long, maybe 1" wide.
So not zero.
Right.....
You said it yourself, Christmas wreaths and crosse on doors is allowed. She is simply asking for equal rights. That's doesn't make her a "victim" or "special".
Lesson:
Don't buy a condo. Apartments are the same.
I'd rather be in a trailer too. But not in a park. Same crappy rules.
Exactly...
but one she agreed to, just like posting in ME here. the rules are dumb but you agree to follow them when posting. she agreed to not place such objects on her property without board approvalIt's a dumb rule,
and hopefully, that is how the board will see it when she makes that request of it... when the size and nature of the object in question is not obnoxious or overtly offensive in nature.
but one she agreed to, just like posting in ME here. the rules are dumb but you agree to follow them when posting. she agreed to not place such objects on her property without board approval
and hopefully, that is how the board will see it when she makes that request of it
Here we go again. Take it all the way to the USSC. This crap has to be stood up against in the USA. Sick.
Connecticut Condo Owner Told To Remove Jewish Religious Ornament Or Face Fines | Fox News
but one she agreed to...
Of course the fallacy in your argument is that it assumes contracts are contracts -> that signing it ==that's it, and provisions can't be challenged, or outright illegal in whole or part, which common sense, IMO, dictates is not always the case.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?