- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 24,669
- Reaction score
- 5,015
- Location
- UK
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
The clip is a Fox News interview with Condoleezza Rice about the war in Ukraine. Rice goes through all of the normal MSM jingoism but in the process makes the case why she should be in jail as a war criminal lols Of course nobody states the obvious.
At 4 mins 45 secs in Rice is asked to comment on whether the Russian invasion is seeing war crimes being committed. Rice refuses to directly acknowledge the criminality and is reserved enough to say that actions are being committed that are " close to the line" and then intimates a wish to " put that aside for a minute" ( I'm shocked. I wonder whether she was getting a little uncomfortable at this point lols ?)
Not getting the message properly the interviewer returns to the subject of war crimes at 6 mins 40 and states " when you invade a sovereign nation that is a war crime" ( true) and Rice is forced into a response that an invasion of that kind is" against every principle of international law and international order" lols I agree btw but seeing as she was part of the US government in her role as national security advisor to George W Bush when it illegally invaded the sovereign state of Iraq in 2003 she just made a case for her own indictment on war crimes charges
So obvious really but you have to laugh at the level of absurdity of the coverage of this war by people who have done the same themselves and those interviewing them that don't see the obvious, or do but just want or keep their jobs.
At 4 mins 45 secs in Rice is asked to comment on whether the Russian invasion is seeing war crimes being committed. Rice refuses to directly acknowledge the criminality and is reserved enough to say that actions are being committed that are " close to the line" and then intimates a wish to " put that aside for a minute" ( I'm shocked. I wonder whether she was getting a little uncomfortable at this point lols ?)
Not getting the message properly the interviewer returns to the subject of war crimes at 6 mins 40 and states " when you invade a sovereign nation that is a war crime" ( true) and Rice is forced into a response that an invasion of that kind is" against every principle of international law and international order" lols I agree btw but seeing as she was part of the US government in her role as national security advisor to George W Bush when it illegally invaded the sovereign state of Iraq in 2003 she just made a case for her own indictment on war crimes charges
So obvious really but you have to laugh at the level of absurdity of the coverage of this war by people who have done the same themselves and those interviewing them that don't see the obvious, or do but just want or keep their jobs.
Last edited:
