• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Concealed Carry Reciprocity

Again you believe a myth
Please cite the bit that says the Constitution takes precedence over treaties.
For the third (and last) time.
The plain text of Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2.

Try to form a specific question if you don't understand what the Constitution is saying.
 
For the third (and last) time.
The plain text of Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2.

And for the third time, please quote the bit that states that the Constitution takes precedence over treaties.

Try to form a specific question if you don't understand what the Constitution is saying.


I just did, not my fault if you don't understand it
Quote the part of the Constitution that states that the Constitution takes precedence over treaties.
 
And for the third time, please quote the bit that states that the Constitution takes precedence over treaties.




I just did, not my fault if you don't understand it
Quote the part of the Constitution that states that the Constitution takes precedence over treaties.
Adios
 
Timothy McVeigh got just enough Supreme Court judges to agree with him and they pulled an individual right out of whole cloth. Apparently, that’s not enough.
That is an interesting fairy tale you got going on there.
Unfortunately for you it’s based on complete bs
 
Abortion was a right until it wasn't just like the individual right to own firearms wasn't until it was.
Can you point to the Supreme Court that has ever ruled that the 2nd did not recognize an individual right to own firearms.

We both know you can’t but I know that won’t stop you from telling lies about it.
 
And it could just as easily not be recognized as an individual right by the Supreme Court later.

Make the case on the desirability of state firearm permit reciprocity. Saying "because Scalia said so" is tedious.

So far, all I have heard is it would make it more convenient for @JMB1911A1 to wander around. That seems like a pretty poor reason to take the ability of people to determine what is best for their own communities away on the issue of guns.
So is this admitting that your early claim that the individuals right to own firearms wasn’t a right until it was, was a lie. Sure looks that way.
 
Back
Top Bottom