• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Compromise

And when you add, "But don't ban them" and "Right to a gun free society", there's no coherence left at all.
Come on man it’s a gun free society that still has guns because they will all be banned except for the ones that aren’t to prevent gun crimes by allowing guns so they can still be committed. It’s easy
 
I've read far more of your ramblings than I care to recall. I have yet to discern a coherent position on gun control other than "ban them," which is not an actual argument.

Whatever
You've certainly posted more "ramblings"...

And what, in your mind, WOULD be a "coherent position on gun control" ?

Come on, back up your cheap words with some substance. It doesn't matter if you support such a position, just give an example of what your mind who view a a coherent position on gun control.
 
Whatever
You've certainly posted more "ramblings"...

And what, in your mind, WOULD be a "coherent position on gun control" ?

Come on, back up your cheap words with some substance. It doesn't matter if you support such a position, just give an example of what your mind who view a a coherent position on gun control.
You want others to make your argument for you. To what purpose? You ignore valid criticism of your current positions, and blithely repeat them.
 
Democrats are anti-gun for one reason: to save lives. They all know guns are the most dangerous items people can get their hands on because one accidental shot instantly ends a human life.

Republicans do not care one bit if completely innocent people lose their lives that way. And every single time I bring up a mass shooting, no Republican has ever explained why the shooter was justified in being allowed to "keep and bear arms without infringement."
Funny because I know plenty of pro second amendment democrats. Including a decent number on this very site.
 
So the word "malitia" in the Second Amendment has nothing to do with state police?

C'mon, man, you gotta know better than this. "For the security of a free state, a well-regulated malitia . . ." Tell me how that is not 100% about government employees who need guns to do their jobs.
No it doesn't. Sorry but that is a simple fact. Maybe you should educate yourself on a fox before posting such nonsense.
 
It's rather clear that you don't actually understand what the word compromise means.

Here is a clue. It doesn't mean I give up something I already have and get nothing in return.

So in your mind gun owners will seek something in return for accepting gun control laws ?

What might this be ?
 
So in your mind gun owners will seek something in return for accepting gun control laws ?

What might this be ?
Criminal background checks as a requirement to possess a gun or motor vehicle.
 
Just like my argument on gun control, that totally destroys yours.
your arguments destroy mine as surely as Hiroshima destroyed the Enola Gay B-29
 
Well it would've done, if the Enola Gay hadn't "run away".
yeah Hiroshima's air defenses were able to take down a B-29? I don't think so-the EG didn't have a fighter escort Nothing in Japan could get up that high
 
yeah Hiroshima's air defenses were able to take down a B-29? I don't think so-the EG didn't have a fighter escort Nothing in Japan could get up that high

The Enola Gay had to fly hard to avoid the "mushroom".
 
How large is the american bald eagles wing span?

More hypocrisy.

You are happy to ask question, but you squirm like a worm on a hook, when one is asked of you
It's hilarious to watch.
 
More hypocrisy.

You are happy to ask question, but you squirm like a worm on a hook, when one is asked of you
It's hilarious to watch.
I answer irrelevant deflections, with irrelevant questions.
 
Back
Top Bottom