• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Commyla’s equity plan will destroy America

Equity is closely associated with the ideologies of Communism, Marxism, and Socialism.​



I have to admit that I am distressed that I have not heard absolute outrage expressed over Kamala Harris’s plan and desire for equity because Communism, Marxism, and Socialism espouse that term. Some strongly object to me using the term Commlya for Kamala Harris but I feel it perfectly describes who and what she is. Her father is still alive and was a Marxist professor in the United States. He proudly described himself as a Marxist scholar in a 2018 article. As such he is staunchly anti-capitalist. Her mother passed away in 2009 and was known as a civil rights activist, going so far as to take Kamala around with her in a stroller to her many protests against America and white people.

This is the background of the person who wants to govern the United States of America. To prove she has been heavily influenced by her parents, the main issues she has delineated in the few interactions she has had with the press are equity, community, and a holistic approach to humanity, which means collective well-being, and stifling individualism. Holistic approaches advocate for a system that supports economic fairness, social justice, and equality, aligning with the goals of Communism, Socialism, and Marxism. These ideologies seek to redistribute wealth and power to ensure that all members of society have access to basic needs like education, healthcare, and housing, which are part of a broader, interconnected framework.

If she takes office, we will be on the road to a reshaping America like we have never seen before in history. No wars or catastrophes have ever been as bad. Not even the Great Depression. The allure of Communism, Marxism, and Socialism to some seem fantastic. Who is not for fairness? Who here would want there to be starving kids? Who would say they are against mental health and well-being? This is the trap. Those who think we should start trying that sort of political structure out of fairness never say that it has been tried before and has failed wherever it is implemented. Cuba, Communist China, North Korea, and now Venezuela. But those who champion those belief systems think we can just tinker with it and make things just a “little" more equitable and fairer.

Things like giving someone $25,000.00 to buy their first house. Or just giving someone $50,000.00 to start a business. How about a guaranteed income next? How about free rent to all or just paying half of someone’s rent? Equity never stops. There is always someone with a need. My mother raised eleven children, and she did it almost single-handedly because my father was a drunk. We had no childcare tax credit. We had no free food. We wore hand-me-down clothes, and we all worked from a young age, and we all had to figure things out on our own without some nanny or Big Brother giving us things. Not one of us got into serious trouble with the law and almost all of us went on to successful lives.

This nanny Kamala wants to take those struggles that teach humans the most away from us. This will inevitably lead to a humanity that is demanding and expecting OTHERS to assume their problems and lack of hard work and ingenuity. This is why these systems fail. They teach and encourage irresponsibility and slothfulness and stifle ingenuity and the human spirit. When you give people something for free it becomes expected and then demanded. Then it becomes unappreciated. Like a drug that is freely given to dull one’s problems, the drug is taken rather than the work of finding the solutions. Kamala’s beliefs will destroy the very fabric of humanity and make America slowly decline into a third-world nation. We must not let this happen.
 
Yes, that is apparent.
Again, you misinterpret what I am referring to. I am distressed not about Commyla but that there are so many people who aren't aware of her real background and that she has had a Max Factor remake. Humans have fallen for this stuff for thousands of years now and I am distressed that they haven't caught on to how they are being used.
 
When it comes to DEI, Harris has made the mistake of speaking the quiet part out loud. When defining "equity" she did not say it means equal opportunity, something I believe most Americans support, but rather she said equity in this context means equal outcomes.

Those are two entirely different things.
 
Really?? I never knew she said the quiet part out loud. I would love a link for my blog posts if you have it. Trying to find anything nowadays from the search bots on politics is really difficult.

But, whether she said it or not, I am sure that's what she means. When you listen carefully to what she says from the very few interviews she has risked, she has three main themes, all of them Communist and what my blog I posted today is about.
1.) Equity
2.) Community
3.) Holistic approach.

I defy anyone to look those terms up and come up with anything OTHER THAN they are the ideas espoused by Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

Equal outcome is crazed thinking. It's like saying you have a white guy that decides he wants a life of leisure and doing drugs is just fine with him because it makes him feel good and in high school he skated through and didn't study much and was graded with all Ds and his parents finally get fed up with him and kick him out.
Contrast him to a black person from a bad neighborhood who sees the folly of drugs and laziness and studies really hard and get straight As and has a firm grasp on many topics but wants to see the world and decides he wants to be a pilot. Unbeknownst to him they are hiring based on a system of equity.
The white goes for the same job and tells his story about a bad home life, and he struggled but the teachers had it in for him and he didn't get good grades and that arrest for heroin possession was a bad rap because it belonged to a friend, and he's been clean for a year.
The managers meet and talk about the two candidates and that the white guy has had bad luck and if he didn't, he would be where the black guy is, who just happened to come from a more nurturing middle-class family out of luck. Further they have hired too many black people this year and are over quota.

Result: Equity calls forte white guy to be hired over the black guy
 
 
It's sort of Marxism-lite.
I saved the video and used the transcribe feature that YouTube has now.

......so-called extreme leaders are suggesting it's a bad thing to care about and pay attention to inequities to say Dei is a bad thing when in fact if we want Fair outcomes we must understand what are disparities and then accommodate and adjust for those disparities if we want equal outcomes so environmental justice raises those points right

Equitable outcomes are is everyone coming out the same way well if they don't look if you don't start on the same base everybody can have an equal amount you're still not going to end up on the same base right
if we want equal outcomes, we need to take into account not everybody starts out on the same base, and we have to make adjustments


Just for fun, and in keeping with a blog post I wrote about Commyla being a Communist just yesterday, I input some questions into the latest and probably best and least left leaning one called GPT-4o Mini (Don't use Gemini or Chat GPT as they are extremely biased.) Here is what I get:

ME: A speaker said:
"Equitable outcomes are that everyone coming out the same way well if they don't look if you don't start on the same base everybody can have an equal amount you're still not going to end up on the same base right if we want equal outcomes, we need to take into account not everybody starts out on the same base, and we have to make adjustments." Is that belief the same beliefs held by Marxists and Communists?

Answer:
The statement you provided reflects a perspective on equality and fairness that is indeed similar to some of the principles held by Marxists and Communists. Here's a breakdown:

1. **Equitable outcomes**: The speaker emphasizes the importance of considering the starting point of individuals to achieve equal outcomes. This is a key concept in Marxist and Communist ideologies, which aim to reduce or eliminate economic and social inequalities.
2. **Different starting points**: The speaker acknowledges that people do not start from the same base, which is a fundamental idea in Marxist and Communist thought. Marxists argue that the capitalist system perpetuates inequality by exploiting the working class and maintaining the power of the ruling class.
3. **Adjustments for fairness**: The speaker suggests that adjustments need to be made to account for the different starting points, which is similar to the Marxist and Communist idea of redistributing wealth and resources to achieve greater equality.

However, it's essential to note that the speaker's statement does not necessarily imply a complete alignment.

Me: That speaker has a father who is a Marxist college professor and a mother who is an activist protester against the American system. Would knowing this alter your perspective?

Answer: That's an interesting piece of information. Knowing the speaker's family background and their potential influences can provide additional context to their statement.

Given that the speaker's father is a Marxist college professor and their mother is an activist protester against the American system, it's likely that the speaker has been exposed to and influenced by Marxist and anti-capitalist ideologies from a young age.

In this context, the speaker's statement about equitable outcomes and the need for adjustments to account for different starting points may be more deeply rooted in Marxist and Communist principles than initially apparent.

The speaker's upbringing and family environment may have shaped their worldview and informed their perspectives on issues like economic inequality, social justice, and the role of government in addressing these issues.

With this new information, it's possible that the speaker's statement is not just a casual observation, but rather a reflection of a more deeply held ideological commitment to Marxist and Communist principles.

However, it's also important to note that individuals can develop their own thoughts and opinions, even if they differ from their family's or upbringing. The speaker may have critically evaluated their family's ideologies and developed their own perspectives, which may or may not align with Marxist and Communist principles.

Ultimately, knowing the speaker's family background provides additional context, but it's still important to evaluate their statement on its own merits and consider multiple perspectives before drawing conclusions.
'


PS. For those not used to chat programs, they are always programmed to give qualifiers which amount to apologetics which are like a liberal saying that even though Kamala can't prove she didn't work at Mcdonal's, and they have no records and have produced no witnesses doesn't mean she didn't.
 
Stop saying Trump will destroy America with crimes and abuse of power, a capitol attack, project 2025 (agenda47 wink wink)
Harris will destroy America by helping people!!

Crazy train USA.
 
Right wingers always make Democrats sound way cooler than they actually are.
 
Right wingers always make Democrats sound way cooler than they actually are.
Guess that leaves you out since you are a Socialist.

How's Cuba and Venezuela doing these days, by the way?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…