• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Comments in the LA Times on the death of Tony Snow...

Ah derr derr derr...twat? :lol:

It's a damned good thing I can't get the flying spittle you're spewing in your rage through this screen.

Let it go man. You lost. We get it. Way to go down in flames though.
 
From DP on Kennedy :













I honestly believe you're being dishonest about what the far right is willing to do. Now sit down.

So did Navy Pride ever respond to your post, Hatuey? :rofl
 
That's funny. I read a 15 paragraph opinion piece that offered nothing more than sniveling drivel that bored me to tears.

Besides, I only asked you to respond to what was written because you made some drive by post about **** in a toilet. Typical nonsense from you lately. If you'd done your homework, you'd have known that what you were responding to was a quote from a reverse debate. I had no intention of defending that position outside that reverse debate. :lol:

As for your post in this thread:



I thought I was pretty specific in referring to the ass pimples that made themselves known when Jesse Helms died and relating them to the specific ass scabs that made themselves known when Tony Snow died. Comprehension is lost on you yet again.

Did you really think your implication of "B-b-but the right does it TOOOOOOO!!!!! :2bigcry:" was going to get you anywhere?

I think people that use cartoons to make their point for them aren't very imaginative or insightful.


Hmmmm, and your calling someone "obtuse" (i.e., namecalling) and using smilies in the manner that you have used them above makes your arguments imaginative and insightful? Frankly, jallman, you used to be able to provide intelligent arguments without the nasty namecalling that I am seeing you do in this thread (and in lots and lots of other threads). It's disappointing to say the least. Maybe you should take up smoking again.
 
Hmmmm, and your calling someone "obtuse" (i.e., namecalling) and using smilies in the manner that you have used them above makes your arguments imaginative and insightful? Frankly, jallman, you used to be able to provide intelligent arguments without the nasty namecalling that I am seeing you do in this thread (and in lots and lots of other threads). It's disappointing to say the least. Maybe you should take up smoking again.

Maybe aps should look at the beam in her own eye before looking at the mote in mine. ;)
 
Maybe aps should look at the beam in her own eye before looking at the mote in mine. ;)

So that's where my beam and my mote went! You guys could have left a note saying you borrowed them. It's a simple courtesy y'all. :mrgreen:
 
So did Navy Pride ever respond to your post, Hatuey? :rofl

He knew he got caught which is why he keeps running and just in case he decides to reply 'What post? :confused:....'

Navy Post 17 - Page 2.
 
Maybe aps should look at the beam in her own eye before looking at the mote in mine. ;)

And what will this do? Somehow change my assessment? I think not. :lol:
 
He knew he got caught which is why he keeps running and just in case he decides to reply 'What post? :confused:....'

Navy Post 17 - Page 2.

LOL And he keeps running........ :rofl
 
Back
Top Bottom