Trump
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 4, 2019
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- 2,333
- Location
- Laguna Beach
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Comey said, He's right. I was wrong. I was overconfident as director in our procedures of the FBI and Justice have built over 20 years years. I thought they were robust enough. It's incredibly hard to get a FISA. I was overconfident in those because he's right, there was real sloppiness 17 things that should have been in the application or at least discussed and characterized differently. It was not acceptable, so he's right. I was wrong.
must be feeling the heat.....
Comey: 'I Was Wrong' -- FBI's FISA Abuse 'Was Not Acceptable' | Breitbart
Thanks for this, I was going to look for it later today.must be feeling the heat.....
Comey: 'I Was Wrong' -- FBI's FISA Abuse 'Was Not Acceptable' | Breitbart
must be feeling the heat.....
Comey: 'I Was Wrong' -- FBI's FISA Abuse 'Was Not Acceptable' | Breitbart
Thanks for this, I was going to look for it later today.
Comey seems to be saying the same thing as the I.G. report is saying:
"There was some sloppiness, but nothing partisan or done intentionally or through animus"
Comey....climbing out from under his God Conplex to admit a mistake? That won't last long.
You forgot to add where Comey said “for reals, no partisan bias, all 17 errors in this investigation were against Donald Trump, but please no errors, my lead investigator was a degenerate cheating on his wife while talking about a plan for a coup against Trump on FBI servers, and I’m way too soft for the big house so please no partisan shenanigans were done you must believe me”
I wonder if he would like to live in the Ecuadorian embassy
All 17 errors were against Carter Page. He had left the campaign long before even the 1st warrant was approved. Furthermore, he was never really part of the campaign to begin with...heck, he never even met Trump!
He didn't say that, because it is not true. However you are saying it, take it as you will.You forgot to add where Comey said “for reals, no partisan bias, all 17 errors in this investigation were against Donald Trump, but please no errors, my lead investigator was a degenerate cheating on his wife while talking about a plan for a coup against Trump on FBI servers, and I’m way too soft for the big house so please no partisan shenanigans were done you must believe me”
I wonder if he would like to live in the Ecuadorian embassy
Obviously there would be no justification for partisanship or criminal wrong-doing in federal investigations, and thankfully the I.G. found none. But when you put a criminal like Manafort in charge of your campaign, what the hell do you think would occur? If you don't want the scrutiny of the F.B.I., don't surround yourself with criminals. Duh! :dohI watched the interview with Wallace. Comey admits to very little and lays the blame for everything at the feet of Trump who said mean things about him and his agency...even though it turns out that they really did **** a lot of stuff up.
must be feeling the heat.....
Comey: 'I Was Wrong' -- FBI's FISA Abuse 'Was Not Acceptable' | Breitbart
How rich! Six days ago crummy Comey was singing a different tune....
James Comey
@Comey
·
Dec 9
"So it was all lies. No treason. No spying on the campaign. No tapping Trumps wires. It was just good people trying to protect America."
"On Monday, we learned from a report by the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, that the allegation of a criminal conspiracy was nonsense. There was no illegal wiretapping, there were no informants inserted into the campaign, there was no “spying” on the Trump campaign.
Although it took two years, the truth is finally out."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...4df00c-1aad-11ea-8d58-5ac3600967a1_story.html
Obviously there would be no justification for partisanship or criminal wrong-doing in federal investigations, and thankfully the I.G. found none. But when you put a criminal like Manafort in charge of your campaign, what the hell do you think would occur? If you don't want the scrutiny of the F.B.I., don't surround yourself with criminals. Duh! :doh
Manafort was investigated repeatedly for years before the campaign, at least since 2014, and rightfully so - he has a dozen felonies to show for it. None of us knew about his crimes, but the F.B.I. was onto him. You're questioning me about things neither you nor I knew about at the time, but the proof would seem to be in his convictions from that period.Manafort was a long-time Republican Party campaign consultant... where was the outrage pre-Trump campaign?Manafort served as an adviser to the U.S. presidential campaigns of Republicans Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and Bob Dole. People simply didn't know about Manafort's criminal activities. When the Trump campaign got wind of Manafort's possible dealings, he was promptly let go.
Obviously there would be no justification for partisanship or criminal wrong-doing in federal investigations, and thankfully the I.G. found none. But when you put a criminal like Manafort in charge of your campaign, what the hell do you think would occur? If you don't want the scrutiny of the F.B.I., don't surround yourself with criminals. Duh! :doh
The IG DID NOT find "no partisanship. He said that Priestap didn't act in a partisan matter in opening the investigation. He did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of partisanship during the investigation but he did find that reasons for the errors and omissions were not adequately answered. In his testimony he EXPRESSLY leaves open the possibility that partisanship DID play a role.
The IG DID NOT find "no partisanship. He said that Priestap didn't act in a partisan matter in opening the investigation. He did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of partisanship during the investigation but he did find that reasons for the errors and omissions were not adequately answered. In his testimony he EXPRESSLY leaves open the possibility that partisanship DID play a role.
We all know that it was a full onboard partisanship investigations in which fbi agents lied, changed testimony side evidence and all other sorts of illegal acts.
must be feeling the heat.....
Comey: 'I Was Wrong' -- FBI's FISA Abuse 'Was Not Acceptable' | Breitbart
Obviously there would be no justification for partisanship or criminal wrong-doing in federal investigations, and thankfully the I.G. found none. But when you put a criminal like Manafort in charge of your campaign, what the hell do you think would occur? If you don't want the scrutiny of the F.B.I., don't surround yourself with criminals. Duh! :doh
1. There was no illegal wiretapping, no spying, no unprofessional behavior in the Russia Probe, and no bias conducted in that investigation.
2. The FISA warrant into Carter Page was bad.
So here's the six million dollar question: what do those two things have to do with each other?
must be feeling the heat.....
Comey: 'I Was Wrong' -- FBI's FISA Abuse 'Was Not Acceptable' | Breitbart
Manafort was investigated repeatedly for years before the campaign, at least since 2014, and rightfully so - he has a dozen felonies to show for it. None of us knew about his crimes, but the F.B.I. was onto him. You're questioning me about things neither you nor I knew about at the time, but the proof would seem to be in his convictions from that period.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?