- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 119,717
- Reaction score
- 75,672
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
and now who knows what marriage will evolve into.
Because you or I may think they are obcene doesn't necessarily mean they are obscene to another person. And because they don't find it obscene and a baker refuses to create them that is discrimination pal in the way you have framed it.
I was a cake decorator for years. My shop was off the house. I was good at it and it was a way for me to generate income while my husband worked a fulltime job and earned his degree at nights. It also allowed me the opportunity to stay home with my children while they were young. I experienced over the years sitting down with customers, as they described to me what they wanted on the cake. And I have to tell you there were times I had to refuse because I wouldn't want my name on that piece of trash they were asking for. Wedding cakes were the most stressful of all. After you incorporate all that the couple wanted to express in their cake, the transportation of the cake to its destination and setting it up was one of the most stressful things I have ever done. You fight the elements, pot holes and railroad tracks. Today under all the new so called "discrimination" laws I would have been facing court time myself if some asshole wanted to file charges against me for not wanting to provide them with a cake that I didn't want my name associated with.
I don't care what "other" people think. Do you believe that homosexuality is comparable to pedophilia?
Let me put it this way, I have gay friends and acquaintances. I would be the first to defend them their rights in regard life, liberty and property. And I would be very disappointed in them if they would not support my rights to the same. I despise pediphiles but that doesn't change the fact that there are those among us who do not find it immoral. There are laws being challenged all over the world in regard to pedophiles and incest marriages to be acceptable using discrimination as their basis for their argument. There are those who support man/boy woman/girl love encounters. Where does the line get drawn since the definition of marriage has been changed?I don't care what "other" people think. Do you believe that homosexuality is comparable to pedophilia?
Sooo, if they are not willing to support other forms of relationships such as incest, poligamy and pedophilia then by their own standards they are discriminating and are bigots themselves.
There are laws being challenged all over the world in regard to pedophiles and incest marriages...
They're both sexual deviants so yes.
They're both sexual deviants so yes.
based on what facts? id love to read them
comparing them in an equal rights discussion is completely illogical and there no support to compare them, there will be no argument you can present to make the compassion logical and rational. They are legally, intellectually and factually different.
Good for you, for a few reasons! But related to this discussion, for refusing to create cakes that you considered were trash. You had every right to. But there is a difference between things like good taste, obscene, offensive, etc and *discrimination.* And the law isnt that complicated. If you had a business license, which I assume you did, it would have been clearly stated.
1.)Let me put it this way, I have gay friends and acquaintances.
2.) I would be the first to defend them their rights in regard life, liberty and property.
3.) And I would be very disappointed in them if they would not support my rights to the same.
4.) I despise pediphiles but that doesn't change the fact that there are those among us who do not find it immoral.
5.) There are laws being challenged all over the world in regard to pedophiles and incest marriages to be acceptable using discrimination as their basis for their argument.
6.) There are those who support man/boy woman/girl love encounters. Where does the line get drawn since the definition of marriage has been changed?
Is it your 'right' to buy a wedding cake that someone else doesn't want to prepare? I suppose they missed that in the Constitution.
They are both Genetic abnormalities or defective people.
Or are you going to argue that it's a choice now?
I don't think so, in fact I know I haven't be misinformed.I think you have been misinformed.
Not today, because trash as you and I may see it, can no longer be discriminated against because that means we have made a moral judgment. And under the discrimination laws in certain states that isn't allowed.
Because you tag meaningless, irrelevant, etc. etc. to anything I state, how about you providing PROOF for your hyperbole you continue to spew?1.) meaningless
2.) but you factually are not this thread proves that
3.) and in this case your rights are fine and in tact
4.) doesnt answer the question
there are people among us that think rape and murder is ok too doesnt make them comparable
5.) this is america rape and types of killings arent illegal other places to, meanignless
6.) meqningless
7.) the line ends at equal rights and illegal discriminant and marriage hasn't been changed.
now stop dodging the questions
do you think homo/hetero-sexuality is comparable to child rape?
do you know what illegal discrimination is? if yes explain it
They are both Genetic abnormalities or defective people.
Or are you going to argue that it's a choice now?
translation: you are dodging the questionsBecause you tag meaningless, irrelevant, etc. etc. to anything I state, how about you providing PROOF for your hyperbole you continue to spew?
I don't think so, in fact I know I haven't be misinformed.
translation: you are dodging the questions
i will ask you again:
do you think homo/hetero-sexuality is comparable to child rape?
do you know what illegal discrimination is? if yes explain it
He will never answer that first question. And therein lies the answer.
i didnt think he would but its polite to give a person a opportunity to explain their positions instead of guessing
thank you for proving you don't understand what illegal discrimination is.
Are you from america?
If you disagree tell us what it is please
There are several definitions of discrimination from philosophical to the United Nations' definition. Defined by the dictionary it means, make an unjust or prejudicial distinction in the treatment of different categories of people or things, esp. on the grounds of race, sex, or age. So to deny a customer of a trashy theme for a cake is indeed discriminating over a "thing".
Do your own searches Critical and as a suggestion you may want to start with "under-aged sex being challenged" or "incest laws being challenged"No, you clearly do not know what you are talking about. But please, enlighten us. Post some links of these laws being challenged all over the world in regard to pedophiles and incest marriages. I would love for you to educate me so that I am not ignorant of this great threat.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?