- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 49,651
- Reaction score
- 55,265
- Location
- Tucson, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
If you understood equal rights you would know that doesn't matter.
Out of curiosity, does the situation change if the couple selected this particular baker because they figured he'd refuse them? What if their intent was to make publicity for their cause? Is that discriminating against the baker?
pertaining strictly to law, no that doesn't matter, laws were still broken
peoples personal opinion about the customers may change one way or another but only one of them broke the law.
If they were doing this to make a statement and he refused them was he still breaking the law?
The ruling in is. Chalk another one up for the good guys
I'm all for gay marriage and equality of opportunity and such, but sorry, the judge got this one VERY wrong. What the judge did was set a precedent that businesses have no right to decide what business they do or do not do. All you need is one agenda drive asshole to bitch about any business not doing what they want them to do, and bam, lawsuit. Idiotic. That is not America, pure and simple.
1.) its not thrown in your face
2.) good your not supposed to care its not your businesses what other Americans do as long as they arent breaking the law or infringing on your rights, good job!
3.) they already do
4.) your opinion is meanignless its worthy just like race, religion, gender etc
Have you seen gays having sex on the streets? I havent. Nor have I seen straight people doing so.
Sex has as much to do with gay relationships as it does with straight ones....it is only one part...and the longer the relationship, the less it matters (generally).
Do you look at straight couples and imagine them having sex? Is that what you think when you look at them? About their sex lives? Yes? (ew). No? Then why do so with gay couples?
Also your opinion and also meaningless
Out of curiosity, does the situation change if the couple selected this particular baker because they figured he'd refuse them? What if their intent was to make publicity for their cause? Is that discriminating against the baker?
Policing people's beliefs is perfectly leagal, now.
I think the issue the bakery owner had against the gay couple is the warm places they chose for their loaves to rise. :mrgreen:
Have you seen gays having sex on the streets? I havent. Nor have I seen straight people doing so.
Sex has as much to do with gay relationships as it does with straight ones....it is only one part...and the longer the relationship, the less it matters (generally).
Do you look at straight couples and imagine them having sex? Is that what you think when you look at them? About their sex lives? Yes? (ew). No? Then why do so with gay couples?
So are you saying being a homosexual has nothing to do with what they do in their bedrooms? Ok maybe it is on the couch.
The point is, is that I wouldn't know most people are gay unless they tell me they are.
This couple, I guess, had nothing better to do than to sue a private business to force them to make their product for people they don't want to make it for.
Isn't it wonderful the lazy life people lead these days allows this much time to do things like this?
OK im sorry but this is just stupid. Im not saying its right that he is discriminating, but segregation happens all over the place every day. Just pick another bakery instead of sueing the guy for it. Half the time i thing they just want the money and barely give a crap about the segregation.
again more details needed
if his reason for refusing service breaks the law(discrimianiton based on sexual orentation) it doesnt matter what they motivation was
If you read the bold the first time, you needn't ask your question. And gays are gay whether they ever have sex or not.
And I'm glad you didnt run into Rosa Parks on the bus that day. That lazy bitch could have moved a little further back on the bus too.
Did this couple have a wedding cake at their wedding?
Employers are not allowed to discriminate in employment .
doesnt matter
Policing people's beliefs is perfectly leagal, now.
1.)The people that sued were not employees, so you are 110% off base in EVERYTHING you just wrote.
2.) They wanted a bakery to make a cake, the bakery said no. That's called freedom
3.) to force the bakery (or any business) to do business they do not want to is government force at it's worst.
Don't make assumptions when you know nothing about what you speak.
Sexual orientation has nothing to do with race and this is not the new civil rights movement.
Again did this couple have a cake at their wedding?
1.)Yes it does.
2.)It shows they didn't need to sue anybody because no harm was done.
3.) I hope this couple doesn't think they changed the world.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?