- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 66,559
- Reaction score
- 22,187
- Location
- Portlandia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I thought Romney had a pretty good shot of winning until the RNC screwed over Ron Paul in the convention rule change midstream. I was one who was going to vote for who ever came out the winner, most likely Romney. The RNC pissed off so many people when they did that...Be honest now... did you predict Obama or Romney?
2007 is when the democrats took control of congress, and scared investors of business by promising to punish the evil rich.What does 2007 have to do with it? Obama saw increased rev for every year he was in office, beginning in 2009.
What "Misuse the parliamentary budget process"?When you misuse a parliamentary budget process to improperly ram through a non-budget piece of legislation...well, that's not losing.
How is High School?So? Just because it is constitutional doesn't mean it is effective.
Laugh your brain off all you want, your post was Incoherent juvenile Hackery, conflating past budget talks and ACA.LMAO.....and please stop with the crazy hostage rhetoric. It simply demonstrates you not a right-thinking person.
Keep in mind that it's the Democrats in the Senate that for multiple years now have refused to pas actual budgets, hence, we've played with CRs...it is the Democrats fault.
Craziness
An open vote of all the House (aka, Clean Resolution) would yield an end to the impasse.1) The republicans are the majority in the house.
And what does this have to do with it?2) Spending bills originate in the house.
Duh.3) The senate can vote yes or no.
What an Obtuse and empty remark.4) It is the democrats who have cause the shutdown.
He sure did creating 17 million jobs and we are paying debt service on the 1.7 trillion dollar Reagan Debt. Obama has added 6.4 trillion to the debt and created less than 2 million jobs since taking office and we are still 2 million down from when the recession began. Guess you missed those numbers in your attacks on Republicans.
Right. Bush's recession was Clinton's fault, and Clinton's surplus was Reagan's doing. Got it. :roll:Clinton lowered Capital Gains Taxes, and had a Republican Congress.
He also built the Sub-Prime Bubble, via executive orders that lowered lebding standards and it was all based on the false narrative of "redlining".
He also appointed a binch of criminals to run Fannie and Freddie, and was a generally scumny dude.
You need to educate yourself.
So, the Democratic Congress gets credit for the huge Revenues of 2007. Got it.2007 is when the democrats took control of congress, and scared investors of business by promising to punish the evil rich.
So if Obama tripled the debt and created 17 million jobs you would have no problem with that?
So if Obama tripled the debt and created 17 million jobs you would have no problem with that?
Actually its 4. 7 million jobs but Republicans will tell you he hasn't created jobs. Also my concern is Republicans mantra that Government doesn't create jobs but yet you give Reagan credit? Please tell me how that works.
So, the Democratic Congress gets credit for the huge Revenues of 2007. Got it.
<snicker>
Right. Bush's recession was Clinton's fault, and Clinton's surplus was Reagan's doing. Got it. :roll:
He has no Mexican in him whatsoever. That was my original point that obviously went whoosh right over your little head.
Clinton rode the wave of peace and prosperity. So, your planer idea, for example, ended up in the market and not stuck somewhere buried under a mountain of "Top Secret" paperwork.Can you be serious, or are you going to be a trolling clown?
Clinton had The Lord of Planar, and my buddies, helping him. The Y2K scare, and internet boom. The Y2K scare was over before Bush took office, but wow... the revenues from corporate profits poured in. The internet bubble popped earlier in Bush's first term, and there was 9/11 too. The recession came after democrats elected to congress promised to be the poor's Robin Hood against the rich.
CMP (Chemical Mechanical Planarization) was a new process in the early 90's It was the paradigm shift that allowed the semiconductor industry to break the 1 micron line widths on chips. I was instrumental in CMP in the 90's, and I know how it revolutionized the industry.
Can you be serious, or are you going to be a trolling clown?
Clinton had The Lord of Planar, and my buddies, helping him. The Y2K scare, and internet boom. The Y2K scare was over before Bush took office, but wow... the revenues from corporate profits poured in. The internet bubble popped earlier in Bush's first term, and there was 9/11 too. The recession came after democrats elected to congress promised to be the poor's Robin Hood against the rich.
CMP (Chemical Mechanical Planarization) was a new process in the early 90's It was the paradigm shift that allowed the semiconductor industry to break the 1 micron line widths on chips. I was instrumental in CMP in the 90's, and I know how it revolutionized the industry.
Your understanding of the economy is definitely unimpressive.Wow! Not only did you prove global warming to be wrong by simple calculations, but you also were the reason the world economy was incredibly strong in the 90s!
We are all impressed.
Hopefully you'll turn your prodigious talents to the problem of Fusion, or a Universal Theory for Physics. Maybe if you have time in a couple weeks?
That being said...I'm pretty sure the Y2K scare didn't help the economy a whole lot, and the Internet boom was a stock market event rather than a GDP event...at least back in the 90s.
Your understanding of the economy is definitely unimpressive.
Clinton rode the wave of peace and prosperity. So, your planer idea, for example, ended up in the market and not stuck somewhere buried under a mountain of "Top Secret" paperwork.
Bush tried to avert the recession caused by the I/T collapse by stoking the flames for a boom in housing market, which allowed people to supplement their incomes through borrowing while allowing banks to leverage at unheard of rates. He also threw a blind eye at all the fraud in the mortgage industry as worthless sub-prime portfolios were sold off to foreign investors. Oh, and on top of all that, there was also the whole war-thing, which buried new technologies in that Top Secret underworld again. In the end, all of that bit him in the ass.
???The irony
Dude, you prove yourself more wrong with every post in a classic case of open mouth insert foot.
Conservative Logic: Tripling debt,good; adding less than 50% to a debt, bad. What's the difference? THe tripling occurred under the Conservative's idol: Ron-Ron; while the slight increase is happening under a Democrat with a funny sounding name.
Uh, Obama's increased revenue by over $1 Trillion.
So, that must mean Obama's debt is good. Right?
Perfect example of "Open mouth insert foot".
Saying the little blip in 80 was worse than the Bush Recession of 2007 is ridiculous. If you honestly believe it, then you have demonstrated to us your complete and total ignorance.
What are you blabbing about? None of what you said here is true.
Clinton lowered Capital Gains Taxes, and had a Republican Congress.
He also built the Sub-Prime Bubble, via executive orders that lowered lebding standards and it was all based on the false narrative of "redlining".
He also appointed a binch of criminals to run Fannie and Freddie, and was a generally scumny dude.
You need to educate yourself.
I thought Romney had a pretty good shot of winning until the RNC screwed over Ron Paul in the convention rule change midstream. I was one who was going to vote for who ever came out the winner, most likely Romney. The RNC pissed off so many people when they did that...
I wonder how many other people either wrote in Ron Paul on the ballot, or didn't vote after than serious snafu by the RNC.
So if Obama tripled the debt and created 17 million jobs you would have no problem with that?
Actually its 4. 7 million jobs but Republicans will tell you he hasn't created jobs. Also my concern is Republicans mantra that Government doesn't create jobs but yet you give Reagan credit? Please tell me how that works.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?