- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 14,012
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Location
- Southern Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
CNN host Carol Costello abruptly ended a segment Tuesday after a guest brought up Hillary Clinton’s 1975 legal defense of an accused child rapist.
Appearing on “CNN Newsroom With Carol Costello” on Tuesday, Newsmax’s Steve Malzberg, who supports Donald Trump said, “When you get one-on-one, especially if it’s Hillary, Donald Trump will go places nobody is willing to go — where the media at this point isn’t willing to go: Bringing up Clinton’s women who say they were intimidated by Hillary. Having them come forward and speak. A litany of issues that you can’t even imagine.” (RELATED: Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Admires Trump)
Costello then interrupted, “I’m thinking that might not be a winning argument for Donald Trump right at this moment.”
CNN Host Ends Interview Over Hillary's Defense Of Rapist | The Daily Caller
More than a few people have pointed out that Hillary worked to silence and discredit woman. The fact that the media is has done a lot to downplay Hillary's flaws just shows how much they're in the tank for her.
She did the job of a defence lawyer. When guests become emotionally incontinent, it's normal to cut to the ads. That's why radio phone in callers are on a delay.
A lawyer will literally get disbarred for not doing their best in the defense of their client. I don't see what the issue is.
Bad people have rights too.
A lawyer will literally get disbarred for not doing their best in the defense of their client. I don't see what the issue is.
Bad people have rights too.
She did the job of a defence lawyer. When guests become emotionally incontinent, it's normal to cut to the ads. That's why radio phone in callers are on a delay.
Innocent people have rights...bad people should have no rights! ............and bad people go to Hell!
Innocent people have rights...bad people should have no rights! ............and bad people go to Hell!
CNN host Carol Costello abruptly ended a segment Tuesday after a guest brought up Hillary Clinton’s 1975 legal defense of an accused child rapist.
Appearing on “CNN Newsroom With Carol Costello” on Tuesday, Newsmax’s Steve Malzberg, who supports Donald Trump said, “When you get one-on-one, especially if it’s Hillary, Donald Trump will go places nobody is willing to go — where the media at this point isn’t willing to go: Bringing up Clinton’s women who say they were intimidated by Hillary. Having them come forward and speak. A litany of issues that you can’t even imagine.” (RELATED: Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Admires Trump)
Costello then interrupted, “I’m thinking that might not be a winning argument for Donald Trump right at this moment.”
CNN Host Ends Interview Over Hillary's Defense Of Rapist | The Daily Caller
It's not that she "did the job". It's that she did the job in a morally despicable way, and then thought it was funny that she'd gotten a child rapist off.
No, she did the job in the way she is legally obligated to do it.
As for the "thought it funny" part, I would suggest you should actually listen to the tape but your perception has already been poisoned
Still reading the Daily Caller and believing it to be truth I see, my my you are on a roll today, just remember rolls get stale sooner or later.CNN host Carol Costello abruptly ended a segment Tuesday after a guest brought up Hillary Clinton’s 1975 legal defense of an accused child rapist.
Appearing on “CNN Newsroom With Carol Costello” on Tuesday, Newsmax’s Steve Malzberg, who supports Donald Trump said, “When you get one-on-one, especially if it’s Hillary, Donald Trump will go places nobody is willing to go — where the media at this point isn’t willing to go: Bringing up Clinton’s women who say they were intimidated by Hillary. Having them come forward and speak. A litany of issues that you can’t even imagine.” (RELATED: Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Admires Trump)
Costello then interrupted, “I’m thinking that might not be a winning argument for Donald Trump right at this moment.”
CNN Host Ends Interview Over Hillary's Defense Of Rapist | The Daily Caller
A lawyer will literally get disbarred for not doing their best in the defense of their client. I don't see what the issue is.
Bad people have rights too.
Credibility of a witness? Yeah, that's part of her job too.No, she was legally obligated to defend her client. She wasn't legally obligated to attack the child.
No, she doesn't at all "seem to be pretty clear" on that. Obviously you didn't actually listen to the tape.Concur that I have a bias when it comes to Hillary (as do you), however, she seems to be pretty clear in thinking that this whole thing is funny, and either doesn't get or doesn't care that she enabled a victimizer.
Still reading the Daily Caller and believing it to be truth I see, my my you are on a roll today, just remember rolls get stale sooner or later.
So why would Hillary and those who support and defend her be so embarrassed by this case? Seems puzzling to me that if the matter was entirely honorable a person needs to shun and hide it.
So Hillary didn't get a child rapist off and laugh about the fact he passed a polygraph?
It was her JOB, some are cut out to be attorneys and some are not, I see there are several here that are not. All lawyers celebrate their wins, even DA's that punt an innocent person behind bars di it, it is called winning. She will do it again in November, just ignore it.So Hillary didn't get a child rapist off and laugh about the fact he passed a polygraph?
Journalists are under no obligation to let you spout nonsense on their show. This idiotic idea that "balanced journalism" means giving equal time to false claims needs to go.
Yes, there are lawyers who are truly the lowest pond scum in the sewage treatment plant of humanity...but just like the rest of humanity, most are good, regular people doing their doggone job.
In a July 28, 1975, court affidavit, Clinton wrote that she had been informed the young girl was “emotionally unstable” and had a “tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing.”
“I have also been told by an expert in child psychology that children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents in disorganized families, such as the complainant’s, are even more prone to exaggerate behavior,” Clinton said.
Clinton said the child had “in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body” and that the girl “exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”
I agree - seems they do it all the time, however. But it's clear that the media, CNN a prime example, does not broker any attempts to besmirch their Democrat nominee, as was witnessed with Obama the past two Presidential elections.
I was simply responding to your post that she only did what the law required her to do and wondered why this was such a fuss if she was only acting honorably? I've seen lots of defense attorneys who are quite proud of the work they do for those who are innocent until proven guilty. We have a very famous female defense attorney here in Toronto who's being crucified by the victim industry because she successfully defended a famous male against three charges of sexual assault and managed to prove, on the stand, that the three females were and are pathological liars. And yet the victim industry claims that all women who cry sexual assault must be believed unconditionally and this female attorney has somehow acted badly. Could it be that Hillary knows all to well how those she associates with would view such a history if it was widely known?
Show me someone claiming that all women must be believed unconditionally or just drop the nonsense and discuss reality. Your choice.
Hashtag on social media related to the case I referred to - #IBelieveSurvivors
Here's an article on the case and the reaction from women's groups - this isn't the subject of this thread, but I appreciate you have no answer for why Hillary and/or her supporters would be embarrassed and want to hide her involvement in defending an accused in such a case.
Marie Henein, Jian Ghomeshi's lawyer, denies she has betrayed women - CBC News - Latest Canada, World, Entertainment and Business News
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?