• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

(CNBC) Education Department says Columbia University fails to meet accreditation standards

I get a kick out of MAGAs worrying about “antisemitism”

Let’s face it, that’s just the label on the bucket they’re currently using to carry the water for their beloved TACO.

There is literally nothing they won’t defend.

Remember who they are.
 

I'm aware of one act of antiemetic violence occurring at Columbia.

That's hardly a convincing argument.
 



Well, Mrs. World Wrestling Federation said so, so it must be true.

MAGAs are such bootlickers for people who claim to care about "freedom."
 
Napoleon said:
The good news for you is that the speech allowed or disallowed by a private university is not a first amendment issue.
Click to expand...
Napoleon said:
The bad news for you is that you’ve crawled into bed with rabid anti-semites for naught.
Click to expand...

Again, I stand behind the 1st A. And so should all of my fellow citizens, including yourself.

Like I said, the Constitution is not a pick & choose cafeteria plan.

It is not an easy thing to stand for the rights of speech you do not like. But that's exactly what the Constitution prescribes. The 1st A was enacted to protect the speech we most do not like.
 
Chomsky said:
I'm aware of one act of antiemetic violence occurring at Columbia.

That's hardly a convincing argument.
Click to expand...
The administration allowed anti-Semitic students to openly call for the genocide of Jews with impunity. An activity inspired by, encouraged, and actively participated in by some of their professors also with impunity. They allowed Jewish students to be spat upon, harassed, intimidated, kicked out of student groups, physically prevented from attending classes, and assaulted with impunity. They allowed people with no affiliation with the university whatsoever on their campus to participate in that. They allowed their professors to verbally abuse, degrade, and intimidate Jewish students in the classroom.

Their empty words now that they aren’t being protected by an indifferent White House don’t cut the mustard. Colombia must be punished for its violations of federal law in accommodating that on their campus.
 

Huh?

the district attorney’s office concluded last month that video footage of the incident does not support the allegation
Click to expand...

Well gollee! How about that? Fake accusation!

Thank you!

The district attorney’s office has already removed all charges against Friedman from its online database.
Click to expand...

And the falsely accused deserves a public apology, I think.

I would suspect they have a civil suit coming.
 
Last edited:
RetiredAtLast said:
Why is it "capitulation to a tyrant" to obey the law? If discrimination is bad for one protected class, why is it OK for another?
Click to expand...

Why are you asking stupid questions?
 
RetiredAtLast said:
Why is it "capitulation to a tyrant" to obey the law? If discrimination is bad for one protected class, why is it OK for another?
Click to expand...
Anti-semitism has metastasized in the left so you’ll never get an answer to that question. See above.
 

Well, it gets even worse for your assertions. It appears that the "one violent case" I earlier referenced, was determined to be a fake accusation. The DA declared their was no evidence to back-up the assertion, and in fact the DA cited video evidence directly contradicting the assertion.

I'd say the falsely accused has a civil suit coming from their accuser.

--

Now to you, once again, I have no idea why you're attempting to justify your failure to support the U. S. Constitution.

But you seem intent on couching your arguments in every-which-way possible, to avoid your sidestepping it.

And BTW, it's "Columbia, not "Colombia".
 
Which one?
Chomsky said:
Now to you, once again, I have no idea why you're attempting to justify your failure to support the Constitution Of The United States.
Click to expand...
Because the Constitution has nothing to do with what a private university like Columbia allows on its campus.
 
Napoleon said:
Because the Constitution has nothing to do with what a private university like Columbia allows on its campus.
Click to expand...

But the Constitution has everything to do with what the Government is allowed to demand Columbia does, on its campus.

That's the part you're not getting.
 
Loulit01 said:
Columbia University is an Ivy League school founded in 1754.
Click to expand...
And snobbery won’t save them from meeting the same fate as ITT Technical Institute if and when they lose accreditation for failing to adequately remedy antisemitism. That’s a pretty wild hill for Columbia to die on in the 21st century.
 
From the article -
"The department’s Office for Civil Rights in early February began investigating Columbia for possible discrimination or enabling harassment of Jewish students and faculty in violation of Title VI, the section of the Civil Rights Act that bars recipients of federal funding from discriminating on the basis of race, color or national origin."

Can you believe the incredible f'ing irony of Trump attacking anything on the basis that they were discriminating on the basis of race, color, or national origin????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…