If it was an inner city gang you and your ilk wouldnt say a ****ing thing about it and neither would the administration.
Well...at least you didnt offer another ridiculous fairy tale fantasy hypothetical that your like minded posters think is 'lame'.
Do you think then that restoring rule of law to this area of Nevada is important and worth the cost?
If the federal agents were there to collect ticket fees, I would have had the same opinion re sending in an armed response unit.If they had "driven off" Federal agents while wearing turbans instead of cowboy hats you'd be calling for an airstrike.
By restoring the rule of law, you mean spending more than you could have possibly collected, turn someone you equate to a racist Forrest Gump into a folk hero, and allowing him to turn you out and bend you over the corral? Cuz...thats what you actually managed to accomplish in this action you love and support so much. Oh...sure...you managed to kill a few cows...but...other than that...you sure showed him, boy...didncha!Do you think then that restoring rule of law to this area of Nevada is important and worth the cost?
Up until a few weeks ago and that debacle of a government action...we never even 'heard' of the 'bad guy'. We know of this because the administration completely ****ed up.The bad guys can never win.
By restoring the rule of law, you mean spending more than you could have possibly collected, turn someone you equate to a racist Forrest Gump into a folk hero, and allowing him to turn you out and bend you over the corral? Cuz...thats what you actually managed to accomplish in this action you love and support so much. Oh...sure...you managed to kill a few cows...but...other than that...you sure showed him, boy...didncha!
Its sad you still think that was their best bet and the right thing to do.
Do you think then that restoring rule of law to this area of Nevada is important and worth the cost?
So...the administration is kinda screwed then. According to you and people like you...that was it, man. That was the best thing to do. The right thing to do. And they failed miserably. So...NOW what? You dont think they might have to actually come up with some OTHER idea that might actually be EFFECTIVE and not make the administration look even MORE clownlike in their failure to deal with a scofflaw cattle rancher in the Nevada desert, do you?Yes, thats what I mean. Do you think they should restore rule of law, even if the cost of doing so is greater than the fees collected, simply because rule of law is important to a civilized society. Or in other words can you place a value on not allowing your police to be forced out of an area due to the actions of a non-government organization which has amassed a lot of firepower? I said before this is beyond the unpaid grazing fees, this is about whether or not this part of Nevada will have law enforcement or if it won't.
Also I respect Forrest Gump more than that.
Also whats' with all the "you's" I'm not personally involved in this?
Oh no you didnt!We could treat it like illegal immigrants and forgive the current ones with promises to do better in the future.
Both problems seem to stem from allowing something illegal to continue for 20 years and then deciding to act.
Oh no you didnt!
:lamo
LOL... no... but the government has done a bang-up job giving "assistance."
Just look at the enslaving rot it has created. Or are you unfamiliar of what a tremendous job government and its community organizers have done? Which was Bundy's point... clearly evident except for those who prefer to defend their being mislead by the vile and deplorable NYT.
The message was one of compassion, respect and disgust for the plight of people enslaved by a government that has done tremendous damage.
I wonder... did Obama's mentor and his best buddy, two racists... disgust you enough not to vote for him twice?
Why do you support someone mentored by a racist?
I assure you...the law and order minded liberals will be demanding ACTION on those breaking the law...ummmmmmmm.....never.Oh yes I did!
We could treat it like illegal immigrants and forgive the current ones with promises to do better in the future.
Both problems seem to stem from allowing something illegal to continue for 20 years and then deciding to act.
Tell you what, show us something that they said that was racist and we'll presume that you aren't an ignorant race baiter.
Are you too dumb to answer the question or too ignorant to know what it asks, again, show a racist statement or go crawl away...You seriously ignorant or just playing dumb?
And that is the main reason the use of force by the government in this example was excessive. The picking and choosing of what we are going to use the government hammer on is ridiculous nowadays.
I don't excuse Bundy's actions one bit, but then I don't excuse the government's actions either. Both are in the wrong.
And that is the main reason the use of force by the government in this example was excessive. The picking and choosing of what we are going to use the government hammer on is ridiculous nowadays.
I don't excuse Bundy's actions one bit, but then I don't excuse the government's actions either. Both are in the wrong.
Doesn't it sort of set a dangerous precedent that people can just arm themselves to the teeth and threaten violence any time law enforcement comes after them for breaking the law?
And it was ignored by Bundy starting when?
And let me ask you. WHY...considering it was MOOT who attempted to press responsibility for the administrations actions onto BUSH did you ignore HER and feel the need to comment on MY response TO her?
VERY...telling...
Um, is this a call for gun control?
Are you too dumb to answer the question or too ignorant to know what it asks, again, show a racist statement or go crawl away...
It's all about cost? What happened to rule of law? You guys used to make a big deal of that but now? I guess it is all a matter of WHO is enforcing the law not the laws themselves. The Govt. acted correctly and competently. I suppose you would have rather had a shoot out so you could bitch about it like Ruby Ridge.
No, it's really not.
Not supporting a group of individuals who point guns at law enforcement, threaten violence, and threaten to put women and children at the front lines of the violence does not equate to me calling for gun control.
May I introduce you to Google, it seems like you're not familiar with it.
When your arrive at Google ... type in "Rev. Wright racist comments", and the next time "Louis Farrakhan racist comments" and you will be greeted with ample evidence. Or just go to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, perhaps a novel thing for you too.
You do know of Louis Farrakhan, the racist given a lifetime achievement award by his racist buddy Reverend Wright? Two peas in a pod... one a mentor to The Audacity of a Dope, the other his sidekick.
You won't go too far here denying the obvious, that Wright and Farrakhan are racists... hell the Commi-Libs don't even try.
I think you might do better at Democratic Underground
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?