• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton reportedly has ‘medical episode’ at 9/11 ceremony

I was not angered by it.

And there you have it. The whole ****ing world revolves around what you think. Like I said, this conversation has reached a point where you either can't or don't want to comprehend what I am saying. I would suspect that you can't because you can't get past what you think in relation to the rest of the world. The rest of the world doesn't exist in your world. That means this discussion will go nowhere because my point is not about you but other people and their perception.
 
Why are the superdelegates a problem now, but not in 2008.

There is no rule preventing the existence of superdelegates.

Sport, it was a problem in 2008. It was just not enough to coronate Hillary when charismatic Barack "Hussein" Obama came along. The party hacks still effectively chose the nominee. They just saw the writing on the wall and decided that Obama gave them a much better shot. Most of those super-delegates changed their loyalty. I suppose you will never get it. There should not be 500 plus delegates who are not accountable to actual primary voters. As for there being no rule preventing the existence of super-delegates, that's because they voted in such a looney system after Mondale's humiliation back in 1980.
 
And there you have it. The whole ****ing world revolves around what you think. Like I said, this conversation has reached a point where you either can't or don't want to comprehend what I am saying. I would suspect that you can't because you can't get past what you think in relation to the rest of the world. The rest of the world doesn't exist in your world. That means this discussion will go nowhere because my point is not about you but other people and their perception.

I get it: some people got angry over the DNC thing, I speak for myself and say only what I think.

I also challenge the people who were angered by what happened to explain the reasoning behind their anger.

To tell you the truth, the people who call the democratic primary rigged without stating hard evidence other than a bunch of emails from April and May.... Those accusations tick me off.
 
For those who’ve been living under a rock, people have been asking questions about the aging Democratic nominee’s health ever since a potentially life-threatening blood clot near her brain was discovered after the former Secretary of State suffered a serious concussion that sidelined her for several weeks. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clinton blamed that concussion for her alleged inability to recall details about her lawless e-mail server scheme.

But Hillary doesn't have a health problem...

Was Hillary’s coughing attack caused by allergies or by a crippling bout of pneumonia? Did she just kind of stumble, or did she completely freeze up? Did she get overheated in the shade at 9:30 in the morning when it was 79 degrees outside, or not? Was she really ill and incapable of walking, or was she totally fine an hour or two later? Was she so healthy that she could head over to the home of her newborn granddaughter and hug a random child on the street, or was she ill enough to require the cancellation of numerous campaign events? Was she not at all contagious, or had her entire campaign team come down with the same strain of the Black Death that required her to be dumped into a van “like she was a side of beef?”

Pro-tip: if you’re going to claim your candidate has a highly contagious infection that caused her to pass out (after exhausting a bunch of other absurd excuses), don’t send her to the home of her vulnerable newborn granddaughter, then have her hug all over a little kid on the street while declaring how great she feels, then suddenly cancel a bunch of her events because she’s so ill.

This has to be painful to the Hillary faithful.

Hillary Clinton's Campaign Needs To Hire Better Liars
 
nonsense.

a well known person keeps getting caught dealing with something other then the truth.

the only reason this isn't a bigger deal in the media is they provide her shade because Trump terrifies them.


Yeah...she keeps getting caught doing nothing wrong. lol

After thirty years...that's gotta be very frustrating for her political enemies.
 
Impeach one of the top three greatest presidents in US history, who led us through our toughest back-to-back challenges ever? LMAO :lol:

Yeah he violated the constitution constantly. He should have been tried for treason. I am glad you demonstrate what the left has always done when it comes to the constitution-the end justifies the means. You liked the creeping crud of collectivism-Using the commerce clause to allow the federal government all sorts of powers that clearly violated the tenth amendment
 
I hope she is OK.:thumbs:

Pneumonia is serious and at her age can turn deadly. I hope she takes the necessary time to get well.

We could all use a break from the circus that this election has turned into. I say we take a week or two recess and come back with 2 candidates telling us how they are going to run this country so the American people chose the candidate they believe will be best for this country. I have had it with all the hype, misinformation, and twisting of the truth from our corrupt and pathetic media for a lifetime.
 
Do I need to say even more about the overreaction about her health? Was it wise, maybe not, but it was necessary to be there because she is a woman. She has to show no weakness because that will be held much more against her than it would against a male candidate IMO.

Balderdash and poppycock.
 
There we go with launch codes again.

Does he seem suicidal to you? Does his personality scream that he wants to kill himself and everybody with him?

Do you think he would ever let anything destroy the buildings he has built?

Who told you to be worried about the launch codes?

Now who is screaming?

Ya the guy is a thin skin, egotistical, ass of a man

Enough to warrent him being kept from winning, and especially from the LAUNCH Codes.
 
Because it is not relevant.
I disagree

someone that showed they are willing to lie about things for no reason other then to make them appear to be someone they are not is completely relevant. It would be nice if the press let the voters decide though. they certainly though it relevant when she was in a heated contest with Obama - who they also loved. now it isn't, just like her health isn't.
 
you would support the press engaging in fraud for the purpose of keeping Donald trump from winning in a free election process?

Yup, because the man is a nut case, and a danger to not only this country, but the rest of the world. You all our fools for believing his empty tin pan promises, ha you were the ones bombasting the left for falling for Hope and Change. But Trump borrows one catch phrase from Reagans playbook Make America Great Again, and hand out free passes for deplorable.
 
Yup, because the man is a nut case, and a danger to not only this country, but the rest of the world. You all our fools for believing his empty tin pan promises, ha you were the ones bombasting the left for falling for Hope and Change. But Trump borrows one catch phrase from Reagans playbook Make America Great Again, and hand out free passes for deplorable.

he is clearly not the only nut case
 
Yeah he violated the constitution constantly. He should have been tried for treason. I am glad you demonstrate what the left has always done when it comes to the constitution-the end justifies the means. You liked the creeping crud of collectivism-Using the commerce clause to allow the federal government all sorts of powers that clearly violated the tenth amendment
:lamo

You wanna talk about the ends justifying the means and trampling the Constitution, let's talk about George W. Bush. Much better example.
 
:lamo

You wanna talk about the ends justifying the means and trampling the Constitution, let's talk about George W. Bush. Much better example.

:roll:

How many attempts at diversion are we up to now ? Three ? Five ? 20 ? If Hillary had a fraction of the integrity Bush had we wouldn't be having this discussion right now.
 
:lamo

You wanna talk about the ends justifying the means and trampling the Constitution, let's talk about George W. Bush. Much better example.

Bush's violations aren't having the lasting damage that FDR's did. BTW if the FDR nonsense had been struck down when he was in office, Bush wouldn't have had the powers to do most of the crap you whine about
 
Bush's violations aren't having the lasting damage that FDR's did. BTW if the FDR nonsense had been struck down when he was in office, Bush wouldn't have had the powers to do most of the crap you whine about

Yeah too bad the Supreme Court chose to use a different interpretation of the constitution.
 
Yeah...she keeps getting caught doing nothing wrong. lol

After thirty years...that's gotta be very frustrating for her political enemies.

lying is wrong though moot. sorry your parents didn't teach you that
 
Back
Top Bottom