- Joined
- May 30, 2007
- Messages
- 9,595
- Reaction score
- 2,739
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
So much for change in foreign policy. Why do I get the feeling that Pakistan will be Obama's Bosnia.
Clinton: Pakistan 'mortal threat' to world - UPI.com
Taliban militants Tuesday took over the northwestern Pakistan district of Buner, just 60 miles from the capital of Islamabad. Militants were patrolling its streets with no signs of government law enforcement personnel,
I have no problem with kicking these guys ass.
So can we have a list of approved countries we can attack?
We wouldn't be attacking Pakistan we'd be attacking the Taliban.
So you'd have no problem with the Mexican Army rolling into San Diego and shooting the place up, because they weren't fighting "us", they were fighting drug dealers?
I doubt the Pakistani Gov wants the Taliban in their country.
You didn't answer the question. You deflected.
Therer really is no need to answer the question since it is a strawman.
So can we have a list of approved countries we can attack?
Pakistan needs to get on this before they lose their country. If they can't do it, we'd be pleased to help.
Pakistan needs to get on this before they lose their country. If they can't do it, we'd be pleased to help.
Because as usual you want to avoid a discussion, you pull this card.
The point is, people are anti-war until thier guy gets in power.
Because as usual you want to avoid a discussion, you pull this card.
The point is, people are anti-war until thier guy gets in power.
There's a lot of truth in that. If it was someone, that was a known conservative republican, stating the same facts about Pakistan as Hillery Clinton is, you would be behind him 100%, I suspect.
But since it's Hillery, and shes a democrat, it HAS to be horsey-poo, right?
Got it.....
I'm sure the troops are behind you all the way on this :roll:
"The U.S. Military: Overextended Overseas"
Exhausted, Overextended Troops Ready to 'Unravel' | War on Iraq | AlterNet
Colin Powell Says U.S. Troops Already Overextended
Special report: Are U.S. forces overextended? | Stars and Stripes
Our overextended military. (11-AUG-03) The New American
BBC NEWS | Americas | US troops sue over tours in Iraq
I'm sure the troops are behind you all the way on this :roll:
"The U.S. Military: Overextended Overseas"
Exhausted, Overextended Troops Ready to 'Unravel' | War on Iraq | AlterNet
Colin Powell Says U.S. Troops Already Overextended
Special report: Are U.S. forces overextended? | Stars and Stripes
Our overextended military. (11-AUG-03) The New American
BBC NEWS | Americas | US troops sue over tours in Iraq
Silly Democrats, when will they learn. We're not leaving Iraq, and yes, we will be bombing Iran. Get used to it.
There's no plan to invade Iran, nor is there any reason to.
The plan is to bomb Iran, take out it's missile systems, it's air force, it's nuclear production sites and a few command and control centers.
No ground troops needed.
Gottahurt said:We cannot live with a nuclear Iran, because our allie, Israel, cannot live with a nuclear Iran.
We're supposed to trust this man, this country....
Ahmadinejad unveils world without Israel | Jerusalem Post
...with nuclear weapons? I don't think so.
I support killing all the insurgents, then taking a small break to resupply, then cranking the war machine back up, and directing it straight into Iran.
Killing is hard work, and we have a lot of hard work to do in the middle east.
God Bless America.
With the exception of God Bless America, I jest, to protest the sillyness of this thread.
I do however, support the bombing of the nuclear facilities in Iran. They've proven over the last 28 years to be very unstable, and cannot be trusted with nukes.
IRAN or BUST!!!!
We're there, let's just clean house and make the middle east a nice-n-tidy extension of us.
I mean, the democrats aren't going to do anything, like defund the war, or troop withdrawal. Sure, Harry Reid will squawk a bit, Kennedy will proclaim it another "quagmire", Ron Paul will have an anurism, the far left will have a rally, then a gay pride parade, the rest of us will be shocked initially, then we'll check our messages, grab some fast food, and go about our normal business...
I say nuke Iran, look at how Japan rose up out of the ashes, a strong economic allie for us.
So will you be signing up to fight, or will you be pleased to simply send other people?
Yes gottahurt. Yes. We ALL know how much you care about the troops weariness and over extension of the military to the point where we can't potentially enter into another front to deal with possibly a fringe person or group getting control of nukes. We all know you care SOOOOO much about that....
YEP! Gotta look out for that over extended military. Gotta ignore possible fringe lunatic groups of people getting ahold of nukes. Gotta avoid starting another front. Yep Yep Yep! TOOO over extended to start ANYTHING else, thanks for that insight Gottahurt.
Amazing how under Bush Pakistan was an ally, under Obama it's a high concern...
Bush did what he could to prop up the Pakistan government, and minimized actions that would destabalize it... Obama said "I'll send in the troops!" now nuclear armed Pakistan is on the verge of collapse and being over run by the Taliban.
I bet Bush will take the blame for it too.. you watch.
Check with the UN. I thought it was the economy stupid.So can we have a list of approved countries we can attack?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?