- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 15,483
- Reaction score
- 8,227
- Location
- North Texas
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
(CNN)Donald Trump, who overcame an onslaught of negative advertising to clinch the GOP nomination, recently turned to supporters at a rally for advice.
"Do ads work anymore?" he asked. If they do, Trump is getting left behind.
The presumptive GOP nominee is being massively outspent on television airwaves: Between Tuesday and Election Day, Trump has reserved zero dollars in television advertising, compared to $117 million from Hillary Clinton and her allies, according to data from the ad tracking firm Kantar Media/CMAG.
Compared to Team Clinton's spending, the buys from pro-Trump groups are a drop in the bucket.
Read More
Among the pro-Clinton spots is one that hammers Trump as "too dangerous for America."
Clinton outspending Trump by $116 million on ads - CNNPolitics.com
I'm no fan of Trump, but who sounds better to run a more fiscally responsible government and manage the national debt?
Probably somebody who hasn't put companies through various bankruptcies and put their name of a diploma mill.
So you'd rather have someone who openly lied to the FBI about emails, got kicked off the Watergate committee for lack of integrity, who enabled her sexually predatory husband for years, and who has a false front called the Clinton Foundation to funnel money from outside negotiations with our enemies?
Trump being broke, It's not hard to outspend him. That's why the busted flush won't show his tax returns, his entire house of cards would collapse.
Clinton.I'm no fan of Trump, but who sounds better to run a more fiscally responsible government and manage the national debt?
How's that working out for you? I have Netflix but i am thinking of adding another subscription. I'm just afraid I would end up paying more for similar content.Damned glad I quit watching TV other than Netflix, Hulu and Amazon Prime.
Hello? Trump is now fundraising. He is putting very little of his own money into his campaign, in part because he's largely lied about his net worth, in part because much of his net worth is tied up in illiquid assets.Hillary owes 1,000 special interests big time favors if she wins.
Trump owes no one.
Again, which do you trust more to manage a federal budget?
As bad as Hillary is (and she does really suck), she's a known evil.Hillary owes 1,000 special interests big time favors if she wins.
Trump owes no one.
Again, which do you trust more to manage a federal budget?
Clinton.
Trump started out with an inherited fortune, has run his businesses into bankruptcy multiple times, has left his creditors holding the bag on numerous occasions, frequently refuses to pay vendors for services rendered, and now does little more than slap his name on things.
The little he's said about his tax policy would drive federal revenues straight into the ground, mostly by giving the rich yet another round of huge tax breaks.
He also clearly has no idea how manage national debt obligations. He doesn't understand, for example, how a government will suffer serious consequences if it tries to renegotiate its debts (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/07/u...l-debt-get-creditors-to-accept-less.html?_r=0)
Clinton, for all her flaws, at least understands that a government has to meet its obligations, and that the entire global financial system depends on the US paying its creditors on time, and in full.
Trump is a total freaking disaster.
Clinton.
Trump started out with an inherited fortune, has run his businesses into bankruptcy multiple times, has left his creditors holding the bag on numerous occasions, frequently refuses to pay vendors for services rendered, and now does little more than slap his name on things.
The little he's said about his tax policy would drive federal revenues straight into the ground, mostly by giving the rich yet another round of huge tax breaks.
He also clearly has no idea how manage national debt obligations. He doesn't understand, for example, how a government will suffer serious consequences if it tries to renegotiate its debts (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/07/u...l-debt-get-creditors-to-accept-less.html?_r=0)
Clinton, for all her flaws, at least understands that a government has to meet its obligations, and that the entire global financial system depends on the US paying its creditors on time, and in full.
Trump is a total freaking disaster.
As bad as Hillary is (and she does really suck), she's a known evil.
But no one knows the depths of Trump's evil!
As bad as Hillary is (and she does really suck), she's a known evil.
But no one knows the depths of Trump's evil!
Both are beyond basic decency.
How'd we get to this dark place?
Clinton outspending Trump by $116 million on ads - CNNPolitics.com
I'm no fan of Trump, but who sounds better to run a more fiscally responsible government and manage the national debt?
I'm no fan of Trump, but who sounds better to run a more fiscally responsible government and manage the national debt?
Both are beyond basic decency.
How'd we get to this dark place?
Gary Johnson
Clinton has many faults. But spending money on campaign ads is hardly something to rail on her about. If Trump had the money, he'd spend it. Maybe he should just call the Koch Bothers and beg?
Just like Clinton begged the banks and hedge funds.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?