- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I couldn't vote for Palin as I think she would try to control my life too much with morality legislation that should would work with congress to get passed.
If Palin ran, and running against her was Satan himself, I would not just vote for Satan, I would work for his campaign.
How do you figure, legislativley what has she done that would make you believe this?
Me, If I HAD to vote for either one, It would be Palin.
nobody is going to eat razorblades.... hey i wonder if hillary knows that she is ahead 25 to 14 over palin in the race here. a lot of people would like to see bill as first lady
Stuff like not allowing the use of rape kits because they happen to contain a morning after pill does not sit well with me. If she sees nothing wrong with crazy **** like that, I have a reason to be very concerned.
Seems a little PDSy if you ask me. :shrug:
uhm, when did she do that?
Palin's town charged women for rape exams - CNN.com
According to the article, its pretty obvious to see that she knew about it. So she was either opposed to it or she was incompetent when it came to budgetting.
I have a problem with that, too.
But it was in practice before she came to office - she just failed to change it.
One wonders why she failed to change it.
if the general election were today, and it was sarah palin versus hillary clinton, for whom would you vote ?
Palin's town charged women for rape exams - CNN.com
According to the article, its pretty obvious to see that she knew about it. So she was either opposed to it or she was incompetent when it came to budgetting.
Stuff like not allowing the use of rape kits because they happen to contain a morning after pill does not sit well with me. If she sees nothing wrong with crazy **** like that, I have a reason to be very concerned.
What a choice! The US is seriously in need of better female politicians. Surely, the female political pool there is big enough to fish better ones than those two out.
I just told you.again i will ask, when did she do this?
What policies were in place and what the sheriffs dept does is not the same as you claimed.
I just told you.
No you tried to link her to something that she didn't do. :shrug:
The fact is, she had ample knowledge of it and she should have changed it. In fact she has less of an excuse than Obama did about the MMS because Wasilla is not the same size as the federal goverment.
so you are holding her to something she should of done?
has obama legalized gay marriage yet?
are the troops home?
double standard.
I hold Obama to those two things you listed actually. I voted for the guy to do what I wanted him to do.
I hold Obama to those two things you listed actually. I voted for the guy to do what I wanted him to do.
so, by your claim, you wouldn't vote for him again or is Palin simply held to a higher standard?
If he continues his course, I probably will not vote for him in the primary, but if it was between him and palin, I would still vote for him because he is more likely to do what I think is right even if I don't get everything.
Well lets get this back to your origional claim.... YOu wouldn't vote for Palin because she would take your freedom away, and your example was that she was in charge and didn't make the sheriff not charge rape victims for birth control pills?
Obama set a health care plan that reduces choice and instead forces you into certain situations...
Seems he's more likley to affect your freedom than palin. therefore, Im confused by your logic.
Which one would you rather have?
1. Herpes
2. The Clap
Honestly, look back at it, I thought a different situation occured.
I don't think socialized healthcare would reduce my freedom.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?