• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton had no official State Dept. email address

The Clintons from their teen years devoted their lives to their own style of corruption in politics including murder. They are where they both conspired to be knowing politics is the prostitute and they are the pimp.
 

Having worked on administration teams for Federal email servers for a decade, this statement is false.

First, unless you are using your official email to sign up for OKCUPID or open an Amazon account your aren't going to be inundated by Spam.

Second, it is a legal requirement that all official communication be saved in perpetuity which a private email account is created to circumvent.

Third, private email servers are far more vulnerable to hacks and exposure than are federal email systems.
 

How very kind of you to call it a no-no. The Sec State is a govt employee (elected), not a ****ing goddess. She gets a govt email account like everyone else. That being said, she ran her own ****ing private server. The question is, WHY?

AP News : Clinton ran own computer system for her official emails
 

I endorse 100%.

Unfortunately there are only rare times that anyone in the Government is held accountable because those who would be taking the steps to punish the infractions are likely doing it themselves.

The corruption in the upper levels of the Federal Government to avoid FOIA is an epidemic. At this point they are all doing it because if they followed the rules they would make easy targets come election time.

The whole apparatus needs to be burned down and start over and there needs to be an independent review and harsh penalties for politicians found in breech of public trust.
 

Yep. I was DoD AND worked in embassies on State systems. The senior people do things with impunity that us low level guys would be hung out to dry for. And the ramifications of THEIR correspondence being compromised would be more serious. It is all a joke. I sure as hell don't miss being a part of it.
 
Unlikely.

She had ZERO impact when she lent her support and influence to Democrats who lost their jobs in the 2014 midterms.

It was kinda a ZERO impact election. Republicans have had ZERO impact since 2014 midterms. (...or before)
 

:shock: The IT practices of this administration are atrocious! And the pro-neuters expect the government to handle the internet just as well as the ISPs! :lamo.
 
Ok, thanks for clearing that up.
 
It was kinda a ZERO impact election. Republicans have had ZERO impact since 2014 midterms. (...or before)

Lol !!

It's kind of funny dealing with people that are in the thows of a full blown episode of terminal delusion.

Democrats are especially susceptible to its crippling effects and have been for at least the last 15 years.

You people actually believe we're in the middle of a economic recovery, and that Obama is a skilled and competent leader.

Ideology comes first, huh ? Even before truth and reality.
 

To the bolded. What's all the fuss over then??
 
Given things like the Chelsea Manning hack, her emails may have been safer on her private account...

I do agree they should all be given to the govt for storage and retrieval under FOIA requests. I'm not bent out of shape because she used a private email account as prior SOS's have done.
 
To the bolded. What's all the fuss over then??

Yes, no fuss at all over Obama's Secretary of state violating the Federal Records act and going out of her way to make sure her Emails couldn't be secured by any future Congressional Committee investigations.

The most " transparent " administration in History, huh ?

Progressives lies are catching up to this administration.
 

You're not bent out of shape because she's Hillary Clinton, the Democrat. I mean lets be honest.

And which previous Secretary of state went to this extent to remain under the radar ?

Which previous Sec of State exclusively ised a private email account to make sure their communications couldn't be accessed by FOIA request ?

One of the reason why this is a isssue is because there's a Committee thats in the middle of a investigation that needs access to her Email, and not just the one's she's willing to allow them to see.
 

if this was GWB, Cheney or C Rice.. they would be deranged with anger...
 

if this was GWB, Cheney or C Rice.. they would be deranged with anger...

Manufactured scandals like " Bush lied us into war " enrages them. They wanted him tried for " War crimes ".

This ? Benghazi , the IRS and Fast and Furious ? Nothing to be concerned about.
 
Manufactured scandals like " Bush lied us into war " enrages them. They wanted him tried for " War crimes ".

This ? Benghazi , the IRS and Fast and Furious ? Nothing to be concerned about.

its very scary...they are zombies..
 

None of which disproves my statement that the Secretary of State has no pressing need for an official email address.
 
None of which disproves my statement that the Secretary of State has no pressing need for an official email address.

Yes, the Secretary of State has an ESSENTIAL pressing need for a secure email account of a Federal email server. Your claim that she doesn't just proves how little you understand about safeguarding top secret and secret data chain of custody.

When you transmit state secrets on a public mail server it can no longer be classified as state secrets. You have to immediately tag the data as leaked.
 
As of today, none of the breaking news is releasing the contents of any of these emails.

It doesn't really matter. You have to assume that the mail is now in the wild. Whether anyone comes forward to release the information is immaterial, most of the damage it would do wouldn't be publically noticeable.
 

Now it's your turn to make a (well, another) wrong assumption. The Secretary of State has other - and possibly even more secure - ways of handling state secrets than a secure email account. Obviously it's not acceptable to use a public server, but it's hardly the only other alternative.
 

Being that I am someone that has done this work for a long time can to explain what other avenues you are talking about that 1) Distributes the necessary information 2) Meets the archival requirements in effect for all official communications 3) Complies with FOIA legal requirements?
 
She may have "more secure" ways of handling state secrets than an email account, but that doesn't seem to be what happened here. She was using email for business. Her position as a public servant required her to maintain communications/conduct government business on a server that allows the agency (State Department) to maintain a record of her communications. She clearly violated the intent of the rule and has provided herself a way to hide her communications from the Federal Government and the people.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…